Jump to content

Tumaini Peace Initiative: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
expanded the article
cleaning up
Line 41: Line 41:
on Tuesday, July 16, 2024, one day after the parties reached an agreement on eight protocols, SPLM-IO issued a withdrawal statement from the initiative citing that the Tumaini Peace Initiative breached the R-ARCSS (Revitalised Agreement on Resolution of Conflict in South Sudan) and clearly undermine the sovereignty of R-TGONU (Revitalised Transitional Government of National Unity) and the ongoing implementation of 2018 peace agreement.<ref>{{Cite web |last=Post |first=Sudans |date=2024-07-17 |title=Machar withdraws from Kenya-led initiative citing ‘breach’ to existing peace deal |url=https://www.sudanspost.com/machar-withdraws-from-kenya-led-initiative-citing-breach-to-existing-peace-deal/ |access-date=2024-07-18 |website=Sudans Post |language=en-US}}</ref>
on Tuesday, July 16, 2024, one day after the parties reached an agreement on eight protocols, SPLM-IO issued a withdrawal statement from the initiative citing that the Tumaini Peace Initiative breached the R-ARCSS (Revitalised Agreement on Resolution of Conflict in South Sudan) and clearly undermine the sovereignty of R-TGONU (Revitalised Transitional Government of National Unity) and the ongoing implementation of 2018 peace agreement.<ref>{{Cite web |last=Post |first=Sudans |date=2024-07-17 |title=Machar withdraws from Kenya-led initiative citing ‘breach’ to existing peace deal |url=https://www.sudanspost.com/machar-withdraws-from-kenya-led-initiative-citing-breach-to-existing-peace-deal/ |access-date=2024-07-18 |website=Sudans Post |language=en-US}}</ref>


Machar, the SPLM-IO chairman accused the Tumaini Peace Initiative of overstepping its mandate, stating that the opposition parties assumed excessive roles. The SPLM-IO also claimed that the initiative's purpose is R-ARCSS annexation and thus not a stand-alone agreement.<ref>{{Cite web |last=Editor |first=Associate |date=2024-07-17 |title=Dr. Machar’s SPLM/A-IO withdraws from Nairobi Talks, rebuffs initialed protocols |url=https://www.radiotamazuj.org/en/news/article/dr-machars-splm-a-io-withdraws-from-nairobi-talks-rebuffs-initialed-protocols |access-date=2024-07-18 |website=Radio Tamazuj |language=en-US}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web |last=Maina |first=Mwangi |date=2024-07-17 |title=South Sudan VP Riek Machar withdraws SPLM-IO party from Kenya-led Tumaini Peace Initiative |url=https://eastleighvoice.co.ke/south-sudan/59480/south-sudan-vp-riek-machar-withdraws-splm-io-party-from-kenya-led-tumaini-peace-initiative |access-date=2024-07-18 |website=The Eastleigh Voice News |language=en}}</ref>
Machar, the SPLM-IO chairman accused the Tumaini Peace Initiative of overstepping its mandate, stating that the opposition parties assumed excessive roles. The SPLM-IO also claimed that the initiative's purpose is R-ARCSS annexation and thus not a stand-alone agreement.<ref>{{Cite web |last=Tamazuj |first=Radio |date=2024-07-17 |title=Dr. Machar’s SPLM/A-IO withdraws from Nairobi Talks, rebuffs initialed protocols |url=https://www.radiotamazuj.org/en/news/article/dr-machars-splm-a-io-withdraws-from-nairobi-talks-rebuffs-initialed-protocols |access-date=2024-07-18 |website=Radio Tamazuj |language=en-US}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web |last=Maina |first=Mwangi |date=2024-07-17 |title=South Sudan VP Riek Machar withdraws SPLM-IO party from Kenya-led Tumaini Peace Initiative |url=https://eastleighvoice.co.ke/south-sudan/59480/south-sudan-vp-riek-machar-withdraws-splm-io-party-from-kenya-led-tumaini-peace-initiative |access-date=2024-07-18 |website=The Eastleigh Voice News |language=en}}</ref>


Edmond Yakani, a civil society activist and Executive Director of Community Empowerment for Progress Organization criticized the SPLM-IO withdrawal, denoting the move as a delay tactic and a breach of the 'Declaration of Commitment' document signed by all the parties that participated in the initiative on May 16, 2024, including the SPLM-IO.<ref>{{Cite web |last=Lasuba |first=Memoscar |date=2024-07-17 |title=Yakani: SPLM-IO's rejection of Tumaini is violation of commitments and delaying tactics |url=https://www.eyeradio.org/yakani-splm-ios-rejection-of-tumaini-is-violation-of-commitments-and-delaying-tactics/ |access-date=2024-07-18 |website=Eye Radio |language=en-US}}</ref>
Edmond Yakani, a civil society activist and Executive Director of Community Empowerment for Progress Organization criticized the SPLM-IO withdrawal, denoting the move as a delay tactic and a breach of the 'Declaration of Commitment' document signed by all the parties that participated in the initiative on May 16, 2024, including the SPLM-IO.<ref>{{Cite web |last=Lasuba |first=Memoscar |date=2024-07-17 |title=Yakani: SPLM-IO's rejection of Tumaini is violation of commitments and delaying tactics |url=https://www.eyeradio.org/yakani-splm-ios-rejection-of-tumaini-is-violation-of-commitments-and-delaying-tactics/ |access-date=2024-07-18 |website=Eye Radio |language=en-US}}</ref>

Revision as of 00:34, 18 July 2024

Tumaini Peace Initiative, which was launched on May 9, 2024, in the Kenyan Capital Nairobi, is a high-level mediation seeking everlasting tranquility for the conflict in South Sudan by incorporating all the holdout groups that have not signed the 2018 R-ARCSS (Revitalised Agreement on Resolution of the Conflict in South Sudan). Kenyan President William Ruto, South Sudan President Salva Kiir, and former Kenyan Army Commander and Chief Mediator Major-Gen Lazarus Sumbeiywo are the lead initiative mediators.[1][2][3][4]

During the Launching of the Tumaini Peace Initiative event, Tumaini which means 'hope' in Swahili, Six heads of State and high-ranking diplomats and officials from different countries in Africa graced the event in what seemed to be the final attempt to end the decade-long South Sudan armed conflict.[5][6]

On May 16, 2024, after days of serious formal discussion on conflict resolution, all the parties that participated in the initiative signed a "Declaration of Commitment", pledging their willingness to renounce any sort of violence. Some of the optimists in the initiative described it as a "renewed hope" others are skeptical of its ability to substantially change the shape of the local tribal conflict in South Sudan.[7]

Professor Jan Pospisil of Coventry University describes the initiative as an outlet for the South Sudan government to attract international support for the upcoming election. Jean-Pierre Lacroix the UN Undersecretary General for Peace and Operations indicated that many issues including the high unemployment rate, conflict between communities, political rivalry, and flow of refugees and returnees into South Sudan could hinder South Sudan's upcoming election. Lacroix warned that another war could break out during the election in an already unstable country if not handled carefully.[8]

The faith leaders of East Africa, Inter-Religious Council expressed encouraged South Sudanese parties participating in the initiative to seize the Tumaini Peace Initiative as an opportunity to bring every lasting peace to their young nation and put an end to the recurring violence and political disagreement.[9]

Tumaini Peace Initiative Protocols

The holdout groups expect the Tumaini Peace Initiative to address key agendas which include, a new interim government, justice sector reforms and establishment of a Hybrid Court of South Sudan, security arrangement, reconstitution of Strategic Defence and Security Review Board, committed and transparent accountable management of public revenues and resources, a new unified army, restructuring and reconstituting the National Constitutional Review Commission (NCRC), facilitation of mini consultative conferences by NCRC, implementation modalities, expansion of government structure by including members of the holdout groups and a new permanent constitution.[10][11]

Tumaini Peace Initiative is vital in two ways. First, the initiative may help reshape South Sudan's political arena by drawing international goodwill and South Sudan donors' financial support for South Sudan's upcoming election - scheduled for December 22, 2024 - by displaying the current political leader's effort for peacebuilding in South Sudan.

Second, the initiative presented Kenya which brokered the Comprehensive Peace Agreement (CPA) between Sudan's Omar al-Bashir government and John Garang's led Sudan People's Liberation Movement in 2005 that eventually birthed South Sudan in 2011, once again as the frontrunner for the peacebuilding and stability of South Sudan as a country. Making Kenya one of the key countries that go far and beyond for regional peace, stability, and security governance in East Africa

Tumaini Peace Initiative's Implications

South Sudan's First Vice President Riek Machar on June 19, 2024, in a letter written to the chief mediator Lazarus Sumbeiywo, expressed his concerns that the Tumaini Peace Initiative may sway the 2018 peace deal. According to Machar, the Tumaini Peace Initiative's draft document is designed to replace the 2018 Revitalised Agreement on Resolution of Conflict in South Sudan accord. He argues that this initiative is in contrast and has no legitimate power to amend the 2018 peace deal.[12][13]

The opposition parties demanded in the draft document that the Tumaini Peace Initiative supersede all the previous peace agreements including the 2018 peace deal as they contradict the Tumaini's framework roadmap.[11]

South Sudan Opposition Movements Alliance (SSOMA) and other political parties participating in the Tumaini Peace Initiative stated that no agreement will be inked with the government of South Sudan unless the newly passed bill in Juba during the ongoing of the initiative, the National Security Service Act, Draconian Security Law be repealed.

On July 8, 2024, Paul Malong Awan, chairman and Commander-in-Chief of South Sudan United Front/Army, Gen. Pagan Amum Okiech, the leader of Real-SPLM, Gen. Stephen Buoy Rolnyang, Chairman of South Sudan National Alliance and Commander-in-Chief of South Sudan People's Movement/Army, and Gen. Mario Loku Thomas, the chairman and Commander-in-Chief of the NAS Revolutionary Command Council, addressed the press conference reiterated that National Security Service Act's Draconian Security Law, which grants South Sudan's National Security Service authority to detain or arrest any individual they suspect of committing crimes without arrest warrant is dangerous and reproduce the Khartoum regime's reign of terror and intimidation and thus opposed entirely by all the South Sudan's opposition parties. The group also condemned the South Sudan government and political parties who signed the 2018 R-ARCSS - commonly referred to as Revitalized Transitional Government of National Unity, for extending the upcoming election for 24 months without consulting them.[14]

The groups also condemned the National Elections Commission's decision to schedule the national election for December 22, 2024, a few days after the Revitalised Transitional Government of National Unity in Juba announced the 24-month extension, indicating this move as "bad faith" as the Tumaini Peace Initiative timeline will contradict that of Revitalised Agreement of the Conflict Resolution in South Sudan (R-ARCSS).

The opposition groups accused President Kiir of dictatorship and demanded that a new permanent constitution must be included in the Tumaini Peace Initiative. The agreed text on the Permanent Constitution through the Inclusive National Constitutional Conference must be conducted in Kenya initially and finished in South Sudan. The group assured that any unilateral decision to hold the election outside of the Tumaini Peace Initiative will not be accepted and will simply be denounced as acts of bad faith which will probably cast a dark shadow on the peace process.[14]

Amnesty International and Human Rights Watch published a joint statement to the South Sudan parliament demanding the National Security Service bill to be repealed, urging that the bill gives "unqualified powers that allow the agency to commit serious crimes with impunity, establishing a state of repression and intimidation".[15][16]

Embassy of Canada, France, EU, Netherlands, Germany, Norway, Sweden, the US, and the UK also released a joint statement expressing what they called a "grave concern" over the passage of the National Security Service bill. "the enactment of the bill into law would undermine the transitional government's attestation that political and civil space exists and that the bill would constitute a significant step aside from the free and open political and civil space", the joint statement stated.[17][18]

The opposition parties also threatened to boycott the initiative and bow not to sign any agreement with the Revitalised-Transitional Government of National Unity (R-TGoNU) if President Salva Kiir did not repeal the National Security Service Act, Draconian National Security Service Bill.[19]

Tumaini Peace Initiative Breakthrough

On Monday, July 15, 2024, after a week of deadlock, the opposition parties involved in the Tumaini Peace Initiative agreed on eight protocols, signaling progress in a positive direction for the months-long peace negotiation. The parties agreed on a security agreement, ceasefire, trust and confidence-building measures, addressing communal violence, arms proliferation, humanitarian access, resolution for the land disputes, and the role of the guarantor to the peace agreement.[20][21]

Parties Withdrawal

on Tuesday, July 16, 2024, one day after the parties reached an agreement on eight protocols, SPLM-IO issued a withdrawal statement from the initiative citing that the Tumaini Peace Initiative breached the R-ARCSS (Revitalised Agreement on Resolution of Conflict in South Sudan) and clearly undermine the sovereignty of R-TGONU (Revitalised Transitional Government of National Unity) and the ongoing implementation of 2018 peace agreement.[22]

Machar, the SPLM-IO chairman accused the Tumaini Peace Initiative of overstepping its mandate, stating that the opposition parties assumed excessive roles. The SPLM-IO also claimed that the initiative's purpose is R-ARCSS annexation and thus not a stand-alone agreement.[23][24]

Edmond Yakani, a civil society activist and Executive Director of Community Empowerment for Progress Organization criticized the SPLM-IO withdrawal, denoting the move as a delay tactic and a breach of the 'Declaration of Commitment' document signed by all the parties that participated in the initiative on May 16, 2024, including the SPLM-IO.[25]

References

  1. ^ "Renewed hope as Kenya-led South Sudan talks start". The East African. 2024-05-11. Retrieved 2024-07-13.
  2. ^ "South Sudan peace talks in Nairobi facilitate key discussions [6:05]". Voice of America. 2024-06-10. Retrieved 2024-07-13.
  3. ^ Pospisil, Ibrahim Sakawa Magara and Jan (2024-05-27). "Overloaded? Hope and Scepticism around the Tumaini Peace Initiative for South Sudan". African Arguments. Retrieved 2024-07-13.
  4. ^ Modachi, Okumu. "Boost as parties in South Sudan peace process commit to end war". The Standard. Retrieved 2024-07-13.
  5. ^ "South Sudan government, rebel groups sign pact to achieve lasting peace". The East African. 2024-05-17. Retrieved 2024-07-13.
  6. ^ AfricaNews (2024-05-17). "South Sudan government and rebel groups sign 'commitment' for peace in ongoing peace talks in Kenya". Africanews. Retrieved 2024-07-13.
  7. ^ "South Sudan government and rebel groups sign 'commitment' for peace in ongoing peace talks in Kenya". AP News. 2024-05-16. Retrieved 2024-07-13.
  8. ^ K, Lekshmi (2024-05-28). "'Tumaini' Peace Talks in Progress: Renewed Hopes On The Horizon?". The Organization for World Peace. Retrieved 2024-07-13.
  9. ^ "Tumaini Initiative: East Africa faith leaders tell S. Sudan to seize peace opportunity". The Radio Community. 2024-06-28. Retrieved 2024-07-13.
  10. ^ "Tumaini Initiative: Opposition parties' four expectations". The Radio Community. 2024-06-13. Retrieved 2024-07-13.
  11. ^ a b umajulius (2024-06-24). "South Sudan draft peace deal creates leadership council". Sudan Tribune. Retrieved 2024-07-13.
  12. ^ Ninrew, Chany (2024-06-20). "Machar concerned Tumaini Initiative will sway focus on 2018 accord". Eye Radio. Retrieved 2024-07-13.
  13. ^ "PRICKY: Dr. Machar wary of Tumaini Initiative". One Citizen Daily Newspaper. 2024-06-21. Retrieved 2024-07-13.
  14. ^ a b Tamazuj, Radio (2024-07-08). "Opposition groups vow not to sign Nairobi peace deal over draconian security law". Radio Tamazuj. Retrieved 2024-07-13.
  15. ^ "South Sudan: Revise National Security Service Bill". Amnesty International. 2023-07-27. Retrieved 2024-07-13.
  16. ^ "South Sudan: Damaging Security Law Revisions Adopted | Human Rights Watch". 2024-07-04. Retrieved 2024-07-13.
  17. ^ "Western governments criticize controversial South Sudan security bill for undermining open political and civil space". www.jurist.org. 2024-07-12. Retrieved 2024-07-13.
  18. ^ "Western envoys criticize South Sudan security bill that could allow warrantless detentions". AP News. 2024-07-11. Retrieved 2024-07-13.
  19. ^ Ninrew, Chany (2024-07-15). "Tumaini Initiative peace parties reach agreement on 8 protocols". Eye Radio. Retrieved 2024-07-17.
  20. ^ Ninrew, Chany (2024-07-15). "Tumaini Initiative peace parties reach agreement on 8 protocols". Eye Radio. Retrieved 2024-07-17.
  21. ^ "Parties to South Sudan's peace process agree to expand and restructure constitutional review commission". ConstitutionNet. Retrieved 2024-07-17.
  22. ^ Post, Sudans (2024-07-17). "Machar withdraws from Kenya-led initiative citing 'breach' to existing peace deal". Sudans Post. Retrieved 2024-07-18.
  23. ^ Tamazuj, Radio (2024-07-17). "Dr. Machar's SPLM/A-IO withdraws from Nairobi Talks, rebuffs initialed protocols". Radio Tamazuj. Retrieved 2024-07-18.
  24. ^ Maina, Mwangi (2024-07-17). "South Sudan VP Riek Machar withdraws SPLM-IO party from Kenya-led Tumaini Peace Initiative". The Eastleigh Voice News. Retrieved 2024-07-18.
  25. ^ Lasuba, Memoscar (2024-07-17). "Yakani: SPLM-IO's rejection of Tumaini is violation of commitments and delaying tactics". Eye Radio. Retrieved 2024-07-18.