Talk:Sanfilippo syndrome: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
m Signing comment by J.pham, UCSF Future PharmD - "" |
||
Line 40: | Line 40: | ||
Peer review comments: |
Peer review comments: |
||
Justin Pham: Question 1: The group’s edits substantially improved the article. Originally blank without much description, has now been edited into an article with sufficient information including but not limited to: Signs and Symptoms, Diagnosis, Treatment, etc. Question 2: They also achieved its overall goals for improvement. Initial goal was to develop a wikipedia page sufficient from the original to provide information in lay-mans terms to non medical professionals and it does well in this goal. Question 3: In regard to language that supports diversity, equity, and inclusion, it does meet this goal/guideline. It reflects a neutral tone that does not induce bias or persuasion towards one side of a story. And it includes supportive language that best support the article so no problems identified. Great job! |
Justin Pham: Question 1: The group’s edits substantially improved the article. Originally blank without much description, has now been edited into an article with sufficient information including but not limited to: Signs and Symptoms, Diagnosis, Treatment, etc. Question 2: They also achieved its overall goals for improvement. Initial goal was to develop a wikipedia page sufficient from the original to provide information in lay-mans terms to non medical professionals and it does well in this goal. Question 3: In regard to language that supports diversity, equity, and inclusion, it does meet this goal/guideline. It reflects a neutral tone that does not induce bias or persuasion towards one side of a story. And it includes supportive language that best support the article so no problems identified. Great job! <!-- Template:Unsigned --><small class="autosigned">— Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:J.pham, UCSF Future PharmD|J.pham, UCSF Future PharmD]] ([[User talk:J.pham, UCSF Future PharmD#top|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/J.pham, UCSF Future PharmD|contribs]]) 00:32, 30 July 2024 (UTC)</small> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> |
Revision as of 00:33, 30 July 2024
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Sanfilippo syndrome article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find medical sources: Source guidelines · PubMed · Cochrane · DOAJ · Gale · OpenMD · ScienceDirect · Springer · Trip · Wiley · TWL |
Archives: 1 |
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||
|
![]() | Ideal sources for Wikipedia's health content are defined in the guideline Wikipedia:Identifying reliable sources (medicine) and are typically review articles. Here are links to possibly useful sources of information about Sanfilippo syndrome.
|
Copyright problem removed
Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40120-020-00226-z https://curesanfilippofoundation.org/worldsanfilippoawarenessday/. Copied or closely paraphrased material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.)
For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, and, if allowed under fair use, may copy sentences and phrases, provided they are included in quotation marks and referenced properly. The material may also be rewritten, provided it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Therefore, such paraphrased portions must provide their source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you. ⸺RandomStaplers 00:55, 24 July 2024 (UTC)
Wiki Education assignment: Foundations II
This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 1 June 2024 and 17 August 2024. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): A. Shahbazi1, Cbtrinh, Dphan2, Ybramos, Htran2026 (article contribs). Peer reviewers: Akaguhi, Vivle, Shahrin.islam.ucsf, J.pham, UCSF Future PharmD.
— Assignment last updated by Health Economics and Policy (talk) 19:26, 26 July 2024 (UTC)
Proposed Editing Plan:
1. Add more details/reformat wording to the signs and symptoms section
2. Cite sources for treatment and include more treatments
3. Cite more data for epidemiology
4. Add more information for the prognosis
5. Expand on history with more sources on how it was discovered / came to be
Proposed Editing Plan 2024
- add citations/references
- reword and add details (with a strong focus on the first 8 sections) the article
Cbtrinh (talk) 22:47, 25 July 2024 (UTC)
Foundations 2: Peer Review
Peer review comments:
Justin Pham: Question 1: The group’s edits substantially improved the article. Originally blank without much description, has now been edited into an article with sufficient information including but not limited to: Signs and Symptoms, Diagnosis, Treatment, etc. Question 2: They also achieved its overall goals for improvement. Initial goal was to develop a wikipedia page sufficient from the original to provide information in lay-mans terms to non medical professionals and it does well in this goal. Question 3: In regard to language that supports diversity, equity, and inclusion, it does meet this goal/guideline. It reflects a neutral tone that does not induce bias or persuasion towards one side of a story. And it includes supportive language that best support the article so no problems identified. Great job! — Preceding unsigned comment added by J.pham, UCSF Future PharmD (talk • contribs) 00:32, 30 July 2024 (UTC)