User talk:Betacommand: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 15:03, 3 May 2007

This talk page is automatically archived by Werdnabot. Any sections older than 3 days are automatically archived to User talk:Betacommand/20071001. Sections without timestamps are not archived

User:Juro, User talk:Juro

The user Juro, who you previously blocked indefinitely, but who was unblocked recently is engaging in repetitively disruptive behavior. Please consult his contribution log for edit warring, refusal to discuss changes, "ownership of articles," removal of legitimate warnings on his user talk page, adding the warnings he removes to the user talk pages of the editors who placed them there, uncivil communication with fellow editors, three revert violations, and etc. FEastman 01:03, 29 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

RCI Fan links.

There have been links to RCI Fan under pages related to RCI ships for over a year, and when I go into the pages to update them, make a single typo which plants the wrong URL, somebody cuts the link, then starts sending some bot of yours to remove them as I go into the pages to correct them. Now they are removing links that are several years old, and it is getting annoying since the site contains RCI related history, information, and resources for people that are looking for information. Kindly figure out that this isn't a spam attack and fix the issue. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by NWLB (talk • contribs) 05:25, 30 April 2007 (UTC).[reply]

WPMCR Bot

It'll be delivered on the 30th of every month (not including this one). You can find it at Wikipedia:WikiProject My Chemical Romance/Outreach. Thanks! mcr616 _Speak! 19:16, 30 April 2007 (UTC) [reply]

mis-tagged

Bad robot. Go to your room. You mis-tagged a movie article Armored Personnel Unit as a computer article. -Arch dude 12:38, 30 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Signpost updated for April 30th, 2007.

The Wikipedia Signpost Weekly Delivery


Volume 3, Issue 18	30 April 2007	About the Signpost

Students in Western Civilization course find editing Wikipedia frustrating, rewarding	Statistics indicate breadth of Wikipedia's appeal
Featured lists reaches a milestone	Backlogs continue to grow
WikiWorld comic: "Calvin and Hobbes"	News and notes: Board resolutions, user studies, milestones
Features and admins	The Report on Lengthy Litigation


Home \| Archives \| Newsroom \| Tip Line \| Single-Page View	Shortcut : WP:POST

You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 06:08, 1 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

betacommandbot adding {{lake project}}

I fixed a series of banners placed on unrelated articles, e.g. Talk:Mount_Tallac. It looks like it's mainly articles in categories such as Category:Lake Tahoe. -- User:Docu

list of DS9 episodes

Please do not remove pictures from the list of deep space nine episodes here: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Star_Trek:_Deep_Space_Nine_episodes I reverted your edit, the pictures are all within proper use and are reasonably small scale to load fast, the pictures are also part of Wikipedia:WikiProject Star Trek. So do not remove them. Jernejl 15:20, 2 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

guide

can you please link me to guide based on which you removed the fair use images? thank you.

Jernejl 18:12, 2 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

there is not a guide, Wikipedia does have a policy regarding those images though see our Non-free image use policy. Betacommand ^{(talk • contribs • Bot)} 19:03, 2 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

VandalProof.js

Hello, Betacommand, I really want to ask you about the monobook ValdalProof.js. I've never seen the monobook that I've mentioned before. Is VandalProof.js only used for reverting vandalisms? Hope you can understand my questions, and respond in my talk pages. Thanks in advance. Daniel 5127 06:18, 3 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Gerry Adams removal

Can you please explain why you protected Gerry Adams and then immediately removed a large section of text supported by multiple sources? I'm not familiar with this article but those sources do appear to be reliable. I understand BLP concerns but removing well-sourced information from an article you just protected strikes me as odd. --ElKevbo 14:59, 3 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

actually I removed the material just prior to protecting but was reverted. those sources are not reliable and are anti-adams POV/slander sites. That information is OR and speculation, and doesnt have support from unbiased third party news/reporting services. Betacommand ^{(talk • contribs • Bot)} 15:03, 3 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

@@ Line 91: / Line 91: @@
 ==Gerry Adams removal==
 Can you please explain why you protected [[Gerry Adams]] and then immediately removed a large section of text supported by multiple sources?  I'm not familiar with this article but those sources do appear to be reliable.  I understand BLP concerns but removing well-sourced information from an article you just protected strikes me as odd.  --[[User:ElKevbo|ElKevbo]] 14:59, 3 May 2007 (UTC)
+:actually I removed the material just prior to protecting but was reverted. those sources are not reliable and are anti-adams POV/slander sites. That information is OR and speculation, and doesnt have support from unbiased third  party news/reporting services. [[User:Betacommand|Betacommand]] <sup>([[User talk:Betacommand|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Betacommand|contribs]] • [[User:BetacommandBot|Bot]])</sup> 15:03, 3 May 2007 (UTC)