Jump to content

User talk:KFP: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
→‎Warning: copy of reply
Line 98: Line 98:
Tommy Kearney is not real and his page is being used for autobigoraphical purposes. It has obviously been written by himself. It should be speedily deleted --[[User:172.142.0.137|172.142.0.137]] 09:54, 16 May 2007 (UTC)
Tommy Kearney is not real and his page is being used for autobigoraphical purposes. It has obviously been written by himself. It should be speedily deleted --[[User:172.142.0.137|172.142.0.137]] 09:54, 16 May 2007 (UTC)
:Ahem... If he is not real, then how did he write the article? It seems, however, that even if the statements in the article were backed up by [[WP:RS|reliable sources]], the subject of the article might not meet Wikipedia's guidelines on [[Wikipedia:Notability (people)|notability]]. I have [[WP:PROD|proposed the article for deletion]]. --[[User:KFP|KFP]] <small>([[User talk:KFP|talk]] <nowiki>|</nowiki> [[Special:Contributions/KFP|contribs]])</small> 10:19, 16 May 2007 (UTC)
:Ahem... If he is not real, then how did he write the article? It seems, however, that even if the statements in the article were backed up by [[WP:RS|reliable sources]], the subject of the article might not meet Wikipedia's guidelines on [[Wikipedia:Notability (people)|notability]]. I have [[WP:PROD|proposed the article for deletion]]. --[[User:KFP|KFP]] <small>([[User talk:KFP|talk]] <nowiki>|</nowiki> [[Special:Contributions/KFP|contribs]])</small> 10:19, 16 May 2007 (UTC)
You've made the right decision - I will no longer vandalise. KCC LIVE also does not meet the notability guidelines, may I add. --[[User:172.142.0.137|172.142.0.137]] 16:00, 16 May 2007 (UTC)

Revision as of 16:00, 16 May 2007

Welcome to my talk page! Please post new messages at the bottom of this page and please use headlines when starting new talk topics. If you leave a message here, I will usually reply on your talk page and post a copy here. Thank you. --KFP (talk | contribs)

Archive
Archives
  1. June 12, 2005 – June 12, 2006
  2. June 13, 2006 – December 31, 2006
  3. January 1, 2007 – February 28, 2007
  4. March 1, 2007 – April 15, 2007

Thanks for the help!

Thank you for the prompt and helpful response to my question about renaming a page so the proper diacritical mark is in the title. I appreciate it! Kishrieves 16:16, 16 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

IP autoblock reversion

Thanks for undoing the autoblock on 194.176.105.40. It's extremely frustrating that one bad user can have such an impact. I don't know if sysadmins are aware but this IP (along with four or five others) act as proxy addresses for the entire NHS in the UK - tens of thousands of users. Thanks again AulaTPN 11:30, 17 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, the IP addresses of logged-in users are not shown to admins. Autoblocks are 24 hour blocks of the blocked user's IP address and are automatically set by the MediaWiki software in an attempt to prevent further disruption. Thus blocking a vandalism-only account sometimes causes collateral damage. For more information, please see Wikipedia:Autoblock. Sorry for the inconvenience. Cheers, --KFP (talk | contribs) 11:59, 17 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Oh yeah I completely understand but if the vandal was already identified as a registered user then I'm wondering why the sysop simply didn't autoblock the account? AulaTPN 07:31, 18 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
If we only blocked specific accounts, the blocked user could keep disrupting Wikipedia by simply logging out or switching to another account and it could be very difficult to keep track of the disruption. Mostly blocks of IP addresses do not cause collateral damage (some shared IP addresses are exempted from autoblocks) but regrettably "mostly" does not mean "always". --KFP (talk | contribs) 20:06, 19 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Protect Your Republic Protest - 1 (2007-04-14) crop.jpg

Hi, KFP. I noticed that you protected this image as it is in main page. Could you please tell me the reason why the image on main pages should be protected? Anyways, Please reply in my talk page. Cheers! Daniel5127 | Talk 06:35, 19 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Main page images, as well as everything else that appears on the main page are protected because of their high visibility. If they were not protected, they would very likely be vandalised, that is, someone would upload a different file (a shock image, for example) over the correct image. This would result in said shock image appearing on the main page instead of the intended picture. I hope this explains the protection. --KFP (talk | contribs) 13:38, 19 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Lutheranism

The WikiProject Lutheranism Collaboration Project is under way. Please help improve this month's article, or make a suggestion for next month's article. To add the collaboration banner to your userpage or talk page, use {{Lutheran COTM}}. -- Pastordavid 19:28, 19 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Someone e-mailed me this link via that email this user link in relation to the image debate I was in: http://www.usmint.gov/consumer/index.cfm?action=CircCoinPolicy

Aside from the page violating condition #4, the first paragraph does not specificlly mention that the American Buffalo Gold Coin is a "covered coin". Would this effectively null the FP stsus of the image or does this need further debate?--293.xx.xxx.xx 11:34, 22 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! The result of the deletion discussion (part of which is at Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/delist/American Buffalo Gold Coin) was "Kept. Near identical replica of a PD work (PD old from 1916) is still PD. No indication of a copyright renewal or any other indication of a copyright." Do you have new information on this? --KFP (talk | contribs) 12:00, 22 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The United States Mint will not object to use of the obverse or reverse design of the Lincoln "Memorial Reverse" Cent, "Indian Head/Buffalo" Nickel, Pre-2004 Jefferson/Monticello Nickel, Winged Liberty/Mercury Dime, Roosevelt Dime, Pre-1999 Washington/Eagle Quarter-Dollar, Bicentennial Quarter-Dollar, Kennedy Half-Dollar, Kennedy Bicentennial Half-Dollar, Eisenhower Bicentennial Dollar or Susan B. Anthony Dollar coins (each, a "Covered Coin" and collectively, "Covered Coins"), subject to the following conditions:

...

*PLEASE NOTE: This policy does not cover use of the design of any coin not specifically defined above as a Covered Coin. For example, it does not cover the Golden Dollar coin featuring Sacagawea, or coins issued under the 50 State Quarters® Program (which has its own design use policy) or the Westward Journey Nickel Series™. It also does not cover the name or other trademarks of the United States Mint, nor does it cover publicity rights. It does not grant any waiver, release, or written permission of the Director under 18 U.S.C. § 709i or 31 U.S.C. § 333ii. By adopting and publishing this policy, the United States Mint is not waiving or abandoning any rights in designs assigned or licensed to it, and is not authorizing or supporting any acquisition or claim of exclusive rights (such as trademark rights) in coin designs. The United States Mint makes no warranty of any kind and expressly disclaims any and all implied warranties relating to coin designs. This policy does not confer any personal right or cause of action, and does not relieve any party from any other duty or obligation.

By the US Mints policy, while the Buffalo Nickel is okay, the Buffalo Gold Coin might be pushing it or outright breaking it. By chance, does Wikipedia have free Legal Services that might help clear this up?--293.xx.xxx.xx 05:12, 23 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Adminship

Hey. As a WP:AIV regular I wouldn't mind having those extra buttons, so if you're willing to nominate, I will accept with gratitude. I have probably done something silly in the past, but maybe I have managed to cover it all up with a bunch of semi-decent contributions. :-) Thanks, Prolog 15:37, 23 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Alright, here you go (instructions)... Good luck! --KFP (talk | contribs) 11:40, 24 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
It's live and I think I got everything right. Many thanks, Prolog 19:40, 24 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hey. The new buttons look good and very tempting, but I'll try to use them carefully. I haven't used IRC for years, but maybe I'll check out the channel later. Thanks again, Prolog 03:38, 2 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Help Me - Table Formatting

Hello. Thanks for your help and for spotting my error in the Table (Male Freshmen, Sophomores, Juniors, Seniors, etc.). Yes, what you came up with was exactly what I was trying to do. Believe me, I looked at it for hours -- and could not spot that code error. Thanks a lot. I appreciate your help. (JosephASpadaro 03:03, 25 April 2007 (UTC))[reply]

Thanks

Thanks for the help(Gnevin 12:46, 26 April 2007 (UTC))[reply]


Help Me - REDIRECT format

Thank you for the help. (JosephASpadaro 20:24, 28 April 2007 (UTC))[reply]

Kelly's block

Wikipedia:Blocking_policy#Disruption. This is not a novice who came here used to badmouthing in blogs and msg boards and needs to gradually readjust snd tone down. This is a seasoned wikipedian, no leeway here. `'mikka 20:50, 1 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Barnstars

Please offer your opinion on the two proposed Barnstars for WikiProject Lutheranism. Pastor David (Review) 18:19, 3 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

help

Can you please tell me how does one put his photo etc. on one's user page...? I mean all that licence thing...please give me details...Thanks Jon Ascton

Hi. To put an image on your user page, you have to upload the image via Special:Upload and release it under a free license. If you own the rights to the image, you can select a free license of your choosing from the "Licensing" drop-down list. Wikipedia uses the GNU Free Documentation License (GFDL), and there are some other compatible licenses. See Wikipedia:Uploading images for more info and if you have further questions, feel free to ask me on my talk page. --KFP (talk | contribs) 15:56, 6 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Watch List

Hi. Thanks for your reply. But, I am still confused. (1) Where exactly is the box that I have to check-mark or not check-mark? And, (2) what exactly is the distinction (and the effect) between checking or not checking the box? Thanks. (JosephASpadaro 15:45, 7 May 2007 (UTC))[reply]

The box is in the "watchlist" section of Special:Preferences. If it is not checked, only the most recent revisions of the pages you are watching will be shown on your watchlist, i.e. one revision per page. Try it and you'll see the difference. Cheers, --KFP (talk | contribs) 11:04, 8 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Great. I did what you suggested. Thanks a lot! (JosephASpadaro 14:41, 8 May 2007 (UTC))[reply]

Hi!

Hi! --Durin 18:56, 15 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Warning

Tommy Kearney is not real and his page is being used for autobigoraphical purposes. It has obviously been written by himself. It should be speedily deleted --172.142.0.137 09:54, 16 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Ahem... If he is not real, then how did he write the article? It seems, however, that even if the statements in the article were backed up by reliable sources, the subject of the article might not meet Wikipedia's guidelines on notability. I have proposed the article for deletion. --KFP (talk | contribs) 10:19, 16 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You've made the right decision - I will no longer vandalise. KCC LIVE also does not meet the notability guidelines, may I add. --172.142.0.137 16:00, 16 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]