Talk:Grange Estate: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 18:50, 26 May 2007

	Pennsylvania portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Pennsylvania, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Pennsylvania on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PennsylvaniaWikipedia:WikiProject PennsylvaniaTemplate:WikiProject PennsylvaniaPennsylvania articles
Stub	This article has been rated as Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

National Register of Historic Places Stub‑class

	National Register of Historic Places portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject National Register of Historic Places, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of U.S. historic sites listed on the National Register of Historic Places on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.National Register of Historic PlacesWikipedia:WikiProject National Register of Historic PlacesTemplate:WikiProject National Register of Historic PlacesNational Register of Historic Places articles
Stub	This article has been rated as Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Thank you very much for your contributions, but in the future, could you please sign your messages with four tildes?--BillFlis 00:34, 25 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

This article was nominated for deletion on 1/8/2006. The result of the discussion was speedy keep.

I have deleted all but the first sentence of this article. There are so many hoaxes and flat out lies in this article (it is part of the hoaxing of Wikipedia with the nonsense about the Eyre/Heller/Peters family, all of which has been proven to be false). None of the information in the article could be sourced, so I've pared it down to a bare single sentence. I would appreciate any additions to the article, so long as they are verifiable sources. User:Zoe|^(talk) 16:28, 26 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Ironic that virtually everything about this family turned out to be true and has actually been extensively sourced in the (previously-deleted but since rewritten) articles about them. Then again, Zoe was never exactly known for her credibility, as we all saw several months ago...

Most of it seems to have been accurate, if [1] is considered a "verifiable source". Choess 08:46, 27 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Unfortunately, when I tried to reach that site all day yesterday, it was down. Much of the history of the place, involving the Eyres and others in the hoaxing, was definitely not correct. User:Zoe|^(talk) 23:15, 27 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Zoe, given that your complaints about hoaxing is causing another editor to "blind revert" History21's changes, could you post a diff explaining which of History21's posts were part of this "hoax"? I've looked over his/her edits, and every posting he made about the Eyre family was so thoroughly sourced to as to be a copyright violation. Thanks, TheronJ 20:26, 31 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

@@ Line 10: / Line 10: @@
 I have deleted all but the first sentence of this article.  There are so many hoaxes and flat out lies in this article (it is part of the hoaxing of Wikipedia with the nonsense about the Eyre/Heller/Peters family, all of which has been proven to be false).  None of the information in the article could be sourced, so I've pared it down to a bare single sentence.  I would appreciate any additions to the article, so long as they are '''''verifiable sources'''''.  [[User:Zoe]]|[[User talk:Zoe|<sup>(talk)</sup>]] 16:28, 26 July 2006 (UTC)
+Ironic that virtually '''everything''' about this family turned out to be true and has actually been extensively sourced in the (previously-deleted but since rewritten) articles about them. Then again, Zoe was never exactly known for her credibility, as we all saw several months ago...
 : Most of it seems to have been accurate, if [http://www.thegrangeestate.org/history.html] is considered a "verifiable source". [[User:Choess|Choess]] 08:46, 27 July 2006 (UTC)