Talk:Grange Estate: Difference between revisions
assess |
No edit summary |
||
Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
I have deleted all but the first sentence of this article. There are so many hoaxes and flat out lies in this article (it is part of the hoaxing of Wikipedia with the nonsense about the Eyre/Heller/Peters family, all of which has been proven to be false). None of the information in the article could be sourced, so I've pared it down to a bare single sentence. I would appreciate any additions to the article, so long as they are '''''verifiable sources'''''. [[User:Zoe]]|[[User talk:Zoe|<sup>(talk)</sup>]] 16:28, 26 July 2006 (UTC) |
I have deleted all but the first sentence of this article. There are so many hoaxes and flat out lies in this article (it is part of the hoaxing of Wikipedia with the nonsense about the Eyre/Heller/Peters family, all of which has been proven to be false). None of the information in the article could be sourced, so I've pared it down to a bare single sentence. I would appreciate any additions to the article, so long as they are '''''verifiable sources'''''. [[User:Zoe]]|[[User talk:Zoe|<sup>(talk)</sup>]] 16:28, 26 July 2006 (UTC) |
||
Ironic that virtually '''everything''' about this family turned out to be true and has actually been extensively sourced in the (previously-deleted but since rewritten) articles about them. Then again, Zoe was never exactly known for her credibility, as we all saw several months ago... |
|||
: Most of it seems to have been accurate, if [http://www.thegrangeestate.org/history.html] is considered a "verifiable source". [[User:Choess|Choess]] 08:46, 27 July 2006 (UTC) |
: Most of it seems to have been accurate, if [http://www.thegrangeestate.org/history.html] is considered a "verifiable source". [[User:Choess|Choess]] 08:46, 27 July 2006 (UTC) |
Revision as of 18:50, 26 May 2007
![]() | Pennsylvania Stub‑class | |||||||||
|
![]() | National Register of Historic Places Stub‑class | |||||||||
|
Thank you very much for your contributions, but in the future, could you please sign your messages with four tildes?--BillFlis 00:34, 25 August 2006 (UTC)
I have deleted all but the first sentence of this article. There are so many hoaxes and flat out lies in this article (it is part of the hoaxing of Wikipedia with the nonsense about the Eyre/Heller/Peters family, all of which has been proven to be false). None of the information in the article could be sourced, so I've pared it down to a bare single sentence. I would appreciate any additions to the article, so long as they are verifiable sources. User:Zoe|(talk) 16:28, 26 July 2006 (UTC)
Ironic that virtually everything about this family turned out to be true and has actually been extensively sourced in the (previously-deleted but since rewritten) articles about them. Then again, Zoe was never exactly known for her credibility, as we all saw several months ago...
- Most of it seems to have been accurate, if [1] is considered a "verifiable source". Choess 08:46, 27 July 2006 (UTC)
- Unfortunately, when I tried to reach that site all day yesterday, it was down. Much of the history of the place, involving the Eyres and others in the hoaxing, was definitely not correct. User:Zoe|(talk) 23:15, 27 July 2006 (UTC)
Zoe, given that your complaints about hoaxing is causing another editor to "blind revert" History21's changes, could you post a diff explaining which of History21's posts were part of this "hoax"? I've looked over his/her edits, and every posting he made about the Eyre family was so thoroughly sourced to as to be a copyright violation. Thanks, TheronJ 20:26, 31 July 2006 (UTC)