Jump to content

User talk:BoojiBoy: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
BoojiBoy (talk | contribs)
BoojiBoy (talk | contribs)
Line 11: Line 11:
I suppose "User hates Wikipedia" isn't really very clear. It's because you keep using abusive edit summaries. [[User:DragonflySixtyseven|DS]] 03:17, 5 June 2007 (UTC)
I suppose "User hates Wikipedia" isn't really very clear. It's because you keep using abusive edit summaries. [[User:DragonflySixtyseven|DS]] 03:17, 5 June 2007 (UTC)


{{unblock|I've done it twice for an abusive former admin who's been desysopped. And I've never even been warned! An indefinite block of a user who's been here for a couple years for the first breach of policy seems to me like killing a housefly with an atom bomb. And it's my own user space, I haven't done it on any articles at all. [[User:BoojiBoy|BoojiBoy]] 14:23, 5 June 2007 (UTC)}}
{{unblock|I've done it twice for an abusive former admin who's been desysopped. And I've never even been warned - no 48 hour block, no anything, just "I don't care you've been here since Nov 2005, you're gone forever." An indefinite block of a user who's been here for a couple years for the first breach of policy seems to me like killing a housefly with an atom bomb. And it's my own user space, I haven't done it on any articles at all. [[User:BoojiBoy|BoojiBoy]] 14:23, 5 June 2007 (UTC)}}

Revision as of 14:31, 5 June 2007


R E T I R E D

This user is no longer active on Wikipedia.

It was fun while it lasted here, but I haven't really been active here for months and I've decided to retire officially. I hope I made some contribution that was worthwhile, and good luck to those who I've worked with on the hockey project and elsewhere. BoojiBoy 00:19, 9 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Further to the previous, I will still probably continue to update the London Knights page from time to time. BoojiBoy 04:26, 10 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Reasoning

I suppose "User hates Wikipedia" isn't really very clear. It's because you keep using abusive edit summaries. DS 03:17, 5 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This user is asking that their block be reviewed:

BoojiBoy (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

I've done it twice for an abusive former admin who's been desysopped. And I've never even been warned - no 48 hour block, no anything, just "I don't care you've been here since Nov 2005, you're gone forever." An indefinite block of a user who's been here for a couple years for the first breach of policy seems to me like killing a housefly with an atom bomb. And it's my own user space, I haven't done it on any articles at all. BoojiBoy 14:23, 5 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Notes:

  • In some cases, you may not in fact be blocked, or your block has already expired. Please check the list of active blocks. If no block is listed, then you have been autoblocked by the automated anti-vandalism systems. Please remove this request and follow these instructions instead for quick attention by an administrator.
  • Please read our guide to appealing blocks to make sure that your unblock request will help your case. You may change your request at any time.
Administrator use only:

If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, replace this template with the following, replacing "blocking administrator" with the name of the blocking admin:

{{Unblock on hold |1=blocking administrator |2=I've done it twice for an abusive former admin who's been desysopped. And I've never even been warned - no 48 hour block, no anything, just "I don't care you've been here since Nov 2005, you're gone forever." An indefinite block of a user who's been here for a couple years for the first breach of policy seems to me like killing a housefly with an atom bomb. And it's my own user space, I haven't done it on any articles at all. [[User:BoojiBoy|BoojiBoy]] 14:23, 5 June 2007 (UTC) |3 = ~~~~}}

If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following code, substituting {{subst:Decline reason here}} with a specific rationale. Leaving the decline reason unchanged will result in display of a default reason, explaining why the request was declined.

{{unblock reviewed |1=I've done it twice for an abusive former admin who's been desysopped. And I've never even been warned - no 48 hour block, no anything, just "I don't care you've been here since Nov 2005, you're gone forever." An indefinite block of a user who's been here for a couple years for the first breach of policy seems to me like killing a housefly with an atom bomb. And it's my own user space, I haven't done it on any articles at all. [[User:BoojiBoy|BoojiBoy]] 14:23, 5 June 2007 (UTC) |decline = {{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}

If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting Accept reason here with your rationale:

{{unblock reviewed |1=I've done it twice for an abusive former admin who's been desysopped. And I've never even been warned - no 48 hour block, no anything, just "I don't care you've been here since Nov 2005, you're gone forever." An indefinite block of a user who's been here for a couple years for the first breach of policy seems to me like killing a housefly with an atom bomb. And it's my own user space, I haven't done it on any articles at all. [[User:BoojiBoy|BoojiBoy]] 14:23, 5 June 2007 (UTC) |accept = accept reason here ~~~~}}