User talk:RichardWeiss/Archivehistory: Difference between revisions
RichardWeiss (talk | contribs) →Pro-pedophile activism: rm section as trolling entries arent helpful to the encyclopedia |
|||
Line 33: | Line 33: | ||
I think the article will clearly survive and is in much better shape than before. I wont remove the afd as I would rather wait for an admin to do so but am happy to see it closed and the article retained, [[User:SqueakBox|SqueakBox]] 18:09, 2 June 2007 (UTC) |
I think the article will clearly survive and is in much better shape than before. I wont remove the afd as I would rather wait for an admin to do so but am happy to see it closed and the article retained, [[User:SqueakBox|SqueakBox]] 18:09, 2 June 2007 (UTC) |
||
==Flores Costa Cuca== |
|||
A "{{[[Template:prod|prod]]}}" template has been added to the article [[Flores Costa Cuca]], suggesting that it be deleted according to the [[Wikipedia:Proposed deletion|proposed deletion]] process. All contributions are appreciated, but yours may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice explains why (see also "[[Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not|What Wikipedia is not]]" and [[Wikipedia:Deletion policy|Wikipedia's deletion policy]]). You may contest the proposed deletion by removing the <code><nowiki>{{dated prod}}</nowiki></code> notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on [[Talk:Flores Costa Cuca|its talk page]]. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the [[WP:PROD|proposed deletion process]], the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the [[Wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion|speedy deletion criteria]] or it can be sent to [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion|Articles for Deletion]], where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. [[User:Bobo The Ninja|Ninja!]] 16:51, 5 June 2007 (UTC) |
Revision as of 16:51, 5 June 2007
Please click here to leave me a new message, signing with 4 squiggles ~~~~
Ctrl F to find something.
This user is not an administrator on the English Wikipedia. (verify) |
User talk:SqueakBox/Archivedisplay User talk:SqueakBox/Current
Sorry I missed that you'd also wikilinked the continent in your edit. I reverted "nations" as there are states, nations and other entities in these discussions. The term "jurisdictions" is a nicer umbrella term. We're trying to keep the lead paragraph consistent across all the Ages of consent in..." articles. I'm toying with the idea of making it a template. Passing the template the unique name ("North America" or "Africa"). Good idea to wikilink the continent though, I'll add that to the others now. Cheers Squeeky. --Monotonehell 05:32, 31 May 2007 (UTC)
- No problem, SqueakBox 15:40, 31 May 2007 (UTC)
Are you sure? The geographic map is simply a arbitrary division for the Ages of consent in... pages. Otherwise people have endless conversations about whether Turkey is in Europe or Asia, and so on. Even that map was selected from one of 7 different geographical continent models just because it spit the World up into roughly an equal number of countries/states. Without it it's a potential free for all as to which page to list on. --Monotonehell 01:21, 1 June 2007 (UTC)
RfC
Just wanted to let you know that I opened an RfC on myself in response to the concerns raised during my RfA over my actions in the Gary Weiss dispute. The RfC is located here and I welcome any comments or questions you may have. CLA 12:41, 2 June 2007 (UTC)
Questions
I can here to ask you to remove your Afd of the Monster Pig article. I think your reason of "Fails notability and includes non rlevant info about other hunted pigs also not notable," doesn't work with this article. The subject has been reported on by CNN, Fox News, the AP, MSNBC, ect. All of which are major news outlets. See [1][2][3] [4][5][6] [7] Also, could you archive your talk page? Thanks, IdeologyTalk to me £ 17:09, 2 June 2007 (UTC)
I think the article will clearly survive and is in much better shape than before. I wont remove the afd as I would rather wait for an admin to do so but am happy to see it closed and the article retained, SqueakBox 18:09, 2 June 2007 (UTC)
Flores Costa Cuca
A "{{prod}}" template has been added to the article Flores Costa Cuca, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but yours may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice explains why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may contest the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}}
notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Ninja! 16:51, 5 June 2007 (UTC)