User talk:SlimVirgin/History 2: Difference between revisions
SlimVirgin (talk | contribs) archiving |
|||
Line 95: | Line 95: | ||
Nice. [[User:Fourdee|Fourdee]] |
Nice. [[User:Fourdee|Fourdee]] |
||
==Islamophobia== |
|||
Your edit summary on Islamophobia says the paragraph needs to be clearer, but not to the extent that I brought it to. Are you saying that to some degree it should be vague, fail to represent its source, or be difficult to comprehend? The previous version of the paragraph was all of those things. I think a response to an arguement should be represented as clearly as the argument itself, in the interest of neutrality. [[User:Xiao t|Xiao t]] 20:44, 9 June 2007 (UTC) |
Revision as of 20:44, 9 June 2007
![]() | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
There is an important query for you there from Jayjg, which I hereby echo. Please share your thoughts on how we should proceed. Eager to get your insights and suggestions here, as always. BYT 23:52, 7 June 2007 (UTC) Your quote"Out beyond ideas of wrongdoing and rightdoing there is a field. I'll meet you there. When the soul lies down in that grass the world is too full to talk about." Nice. Fourdee IslamophobiaYour edit summary on Islamophobia says the paragraph needs to be clearer, but not to the extent that I brought it to. Are you saying that to some degree it should be vague, fail to represent its source, or be difficult to comprehend? The previous version of the paragraph was all of those things. I think a response to an arguement should be represented as clearly as the argument itself, in the interest of neutrality. Xiao t 20:44, 9 June 2007 (UTC) |