User talk:Lilkunta: Difference between revisions

Browse history interactively

← Previous edit Next edit →

Content deleted Content added

VisualWikitext

Inline

Revision as of 01:04, 27 July 2007

lilkunta Archives: Archive 1___Archive 2___Archive 3___Archive 4___Archive 5___Archive 6

This user is asking that their block be reviewed:

Lilkunta (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Time has passed. I have things to add 2 wiki.

Notes:

In some cases, you may not in fact be blocked, or your block has already expired. Please check the list of active blocks. If no block is listed, then you have been autoblocked by the automated anti-vandalism systems. Please remove this request and follow these instructions instead for quick attention by an administrator.
Please read our guide to appealing blocks to make sure that your unblock request will help your case. You may change your request at any time.

Administrator use only:

If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, replace this template with the following, replacing "blocking administrator" with the name of the blocking admin:

{{Unblock on hold |1=blocking administrator |2=Time has passed. I have things to add 2 wiki. |3 = ~~~~}}

If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following code, substituting {{subst:Decline reason here}} with a specific rationale. Leaving the decline reason unchanged will result in display of a default reason, explaining why the request was declined.

{{unblock reviewed |1=Time has passed. I have things to add 2 wiki. |decline = {{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}

If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting Accept reason here with your rationale:

{{unblock reviewed |1=Time has passed. I have things to add 2 wiki. |accept = accept reason here ~~~~}}

__ Lilkunta, I'm not an admin or anything, just chipping in with my opinion, but as far as I am aware, you have been blocked four times by three different admins, and according to the block log, not once have you been blocked for deleting anything. Yet in your unblock reasons, you continually say you didn't delete anything. You haven't been blocked for deleting things, you have been blocked for disruption. --Dreaded Walrus ^{t c} 16:09, 14 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

'darth' blocked saying I deleted comments which I didnt. I archived the comments. She didnt look b4 she leaped and just unfairly blocked w/o knowing the whole story ! If she had checked--which 1 is supposed to 2 b4 u just block some 1-- she woulda seen this !_ Lilkunta 00:57, 27 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
-<FONT FACE="Comic Sans MS" SIZE="3" COLOR="green">'''lilkunta Archives'''</FONT>[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:lilkunta/Archive1 Archive 1]___[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:lilkunta/Archive2 Archive 2]___[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Lilkunta/Archive3 Archive 3]___[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Lilkunta/Archive4 Archive 4]___[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Lilkunta/Archive5 Archive 5]___[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Lilkunta/Archive6 Archive 6]
+<FONT FACE="Comic Sans MS" SIZE="3" COLOR="green">'''lilkunta Archives''':</FONT>  [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:lilkunta/Archive1 Archive 1]___[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:lilkunta/Archive2 Archive 2]___[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Lilkunta/Archive3 Archive 3]___[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Lilkunta/Archive4 Archive 4]___[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Lilkunta/Archive5 Archive 5]___[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Lilkunta/Archive6 Archive 6]
+{{unblock|Time has passed.  I have things to add 2 wiki.}}
+__
-<FONT FACE="Comic Sans MS" SIZE="3" COLOR="green">'''Could <U>OTHER ADMINS</U> please come? ''' The same bias ones come, probably because they are stalking my edits.
-If fresh eyes look, the reason I gave isnt the reason 'metros' responded to.I'd like others to weigh in as metros is very one-sided towards me.
-The block was for what 'darth' took to be a deletion, as if I were trying to hide comments. Some time has passed.</FONT>
-{{unblock reviewed|1=I didnt do the deletion ( this and this) that was the 'reason' 4 the block. I archived (as seen here) so my page wouldn't be unneccessarily lenghthy.|decline=You did do the deletion, see [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Lilkunta/Archive6&diff=prev&oldid=128855126 here].  But that's not relevant to the reason you were blocked. As you have not addressed the reason you were blocked, there are no grounds to even consider an unblock. — [[User:Yamla|Yamla]] 16:16, 14 June 2007 (UTC)}}
 Lilkunta, I'm not an admin or anything, just chipping in with my opinion, but as far as I am aware, you have been blocked [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special%3ALog&type=block&user=&page=User%3ALilkunta four times by three different admins], and according to the block log, not once have you been blocked for deleting anything. Yet in your unblock reasons, you continually say you didn't delete anything. You haven't been blocked for deleting things, you have been blocked for disruption. --[[User:Dreaded Walrus|Dreaded Walrus]] <sup> [[User talk:Dreaded Walrus|t]] [[Special:Contributions/Dreaded Walrus|c]]</sup> 16:09, 14 June 2007 (UTC)
 :<FONT FACE="Comic Sans MS" SIZE="3" COLOR="green"> 'darth' blocked saying I deleted comments which I didnt. I archived the comments. She didnt look b4 she leaped and just unfairly blocked w/o knowing the whole story ! If she had checked--which 1 is supposed to 2 b4 u just block some 1-- she woulda seen this !</FONT>_ [[User:Lilkunta|Lilkunta]] 00:57, 27 July 2007 (UTC)