User talk:Onorem/Archive 6

Archives

Archive 1 - 2006

Archive 2 - Jan 2007

Archive 3 - Feb-Mar 2007

Archive 4 - April-Jun 2007

Archive 5 - July 2007

Hello. Please leave new comments at the bottom of the page.
Remember to sign your comments by adding --~~~~ at the end.
I will reply on your talk page unless you request I reply here.
I reserve the right to edit the style, not substance, of comments left for my own readability. (Punctuation, Spelling, Capitalization)
If I do edit your comments, a diff will be provided showing the changes.

• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• How to edit a page
• Help pages
• Tutorial
• How to write a great article
• Manual of Style

I-35W Mississippi River bridge

RE; your message - the material in question was on multiple webpages yesterday - if you enter text fragments now you only catch the rapidly diminishing cache hits. Clearly a non-web citation will be required, but I did not make this up. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Djg2006 (talk • contribs)

OK, then why not add your citation - time of day, and call letters of the radio station. This can be verified via FCC logs. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Djg2006 (talk • contribs)

Hmm...I've never seen a radio station cited as a source...and I don't think it's all that important to the article. --Onorem♠Dil 20:04, 3 August 2007 (UTC)

Well, I think it is redundant, but it does make the autoformating easier after reading your link. So if you insist, then do that. Chris! _{my talk} 20:34, 3 August 2007 (UTC)

List of Internet slang phrases

I see you and I have been keeping an eye on this page for various unsourced IP additions for the last few weeks. Now rejoice, it has been semi-protected indefinitely! :-) Melsaran 17:22, 8 August 2007 (UTC)

IIHCR

We are different people working together on atricles with a single user account. Is it against the policies of Wikipedia? If so, we are ready to create individual accounts.IIHCR 04:06, 9 August 2007 (UTC)

Unfortunately, it is. If you all register an own account, we know which edits come from which person. Melsaran 11:35, 9 August 2007 (UTC)

IIHCR

As you suggested, we will be using different accounts for each one of us. Some of us (including me who write this ) already possess own personal accounts. Thank you for your advise.IIHCR 12:34, 9 August 2007 (UTC)

Princemathewalleppey

I am a member of IIHCR. As you suggested, now I am using my personal account. Sorry for the 'tag removal'. Such activities will never be repeated.Princemathewalleppey 12:41, 9 August 2007 (UTC)

User:Tancred

G'day,

So I can not delete the sockpuppet accusation notice, but Tancred can delete the uncited material notices? I am not trying to whinge about being treated unfairly, I am just curious to know whether that is the situation as you seem to know the rules very well. --Tomasthetankengine 18:15, 9 August 2007 (UTC)

Cheers. --Tomasthetankengine 18:25, 9 August 2007 (UTC)

Please help block

Please block or get an administrator to block the IP 24.117.147.70 for vandilizing Down III: Over the Under and attacking me and my religion he reverted the edit again by saying

• (Undid revision 150456211 by Skeeker (talk) I will not be controlled by a CHRISTIAN metallica fan. Fuck off douchebag.)

I seem to be ignored when I try getting administration help, so please help for me. Thank you. Skeeker _[Talk] 03:50, 13 August 2007 (UTC)

Thank you, he also personally attaked me so he should be blocked now shouldn't he? Skeeker _[Talk] 03:56, 13 August 2007 (UTC)

He also said "fuck off douchebag" that should count as a personal attack. Skeeker _[Talk] 04:02, 13 August 2007 (UTC)

Thank you, I don't know how I found this out but you can put {{protected}} on the page and he will not be able to take it off. Skeeker _[Talk] 04:14, 13 August 2007 (UTC)

Thanks Skeeker _[Talk] 04:23, 13 August 2007 (UTC)

Removing the "This article does not cite any references or sources" template

Hi. It seems you stuck the template referred to above on the Basque grammar article which I began uploading this afternoon.

I have written a number of grammar articles on Wikipedia over the past 12 months (my user page states which ones). I started the Basque grammar article many months ago but have only started to upload it today. Because my work is still unfinished and some sections are more finished than others, I have started to do so by parts. I have so far put up one section, and it is not the bibliography; therefore there were no "references or sources" visible, but over the next few hours (or couple of days) it was may intention to take care of that. You just didn't give me time! (Notice that my note on my first upload states: "More coming soon"!)

After seeing your template on reopening the page, I have dropped everything to attend to this problem first, at least provisionally, by listing four important book references (two of which are items written by myself, but that is not strictly relevant: they are mainstream publications). A far longer bibliography could be provided to accompany this article (although few of the items would be in English), but for starters this is surely enough?

So my question is: can I now remove the template stating that the article does not cite any references or sources? Or can you do so? And if not, then when can this be done. I have no wish to jump the gun of Wikipedia etiquette by "reverting" your "contribution" if such behaviour is not warranted, and this is the first time I have been faced with this particular issue. Alan --A R King 16:08, 15 August 2007 (UTC)

Message from Rouge Crimson

What does npov mean? I don't get what you're talking about. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rouge Crimson (talk • contribs)

AIV

This recent AIV report Should go to WP:SSP. That Page is for Sockpuppets. Happy editing! J-stan ^Talk_Contribs 20:26, 18 August 2007 (UTC)

I disagree that it belongs at SSP. SSP is for discussion and none was needed in this case. --Onorem♠Dil 20:31, 18 August 2007 (UTC)

My point was that you were requesting a block for sockpuppetry, not vandalism. Unless I misunderstand, and this guy who you reported is a vandal. J-stan ^Talk_Contribs 20:57, 18 August 2007 (UTC)

The RickK Anti-Vandalism Barnstar

		The RickK Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
		I'm awarding you this RickK Anti-Vandalism Barnstar for your great contributions to protecting and reverting attacks of vandalism on Wikipedia. Wikidudeman (talk) 22:17, 18 August 2007 (UTC)

Thank you. --Onorem♠Dil 12:07, 19 August 2007 (UTC)

Message from Havendark (talk · contribs)

Hey bro, be nice eh? ;) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Havendark (talk • contribs) moved here from user page by --Onorem♠Dil 14:06, 20 August 2007 (UTC)

I'll make you a deal. You stop adding your nonsense and I'll be nice. --Onorem♠Dil 14:06, 20 August 2007 (UTC)

Thanks for rolling back my userpage before. Very much appreciated. :) Cheers, Sarah 14:23, 20 August 2007 (UTC)

Anytime. --Onorem♠Dil 14:30, 20 August 2007 (UTC)

MY NAME IS NOT AN IMPLAUSIBLE FUCKING TYPO MOTHER FUCKER. CEASE AND FUCKING DESIST BEFORE I OPEN A CAN OF WHOOP FUCKING ASS. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Havendark (talk • contribs) moved here from user page by --Onorem♠Dil 14:30, 20 August 2007 (UTC)

Just an FYI: 2007 images

Just to let you know, that previous editor had added very low quality screen-captures, (and to other pages, and removing images with no explanation from other pages as well) and so I replaced them with Commons images. When possible, we are encouraged to use Commons images, so I could not understand that editor's action, and there was no explanation in the edit summary. Also, I balanced the page visually by moving the images, when images are all on the right side, it makes the page "heavy" on that side, and visually imbalanced. Not so noticeable on the 2007 page, since it has fewer images, but definitely noticeable on articles with many. I've asked that editor why s/he is removing images and replacing them with junk quality images, or removing them altogether, but the editor does not answer. Just wanted to let you know my thinking, so you weren't wondering. Thanks! ^Ariel♥Gold 18:31, 20 August 2007 (UTC)

Message from Jimmythegothfreak

hey, the article im creating shouldnt be speedy deleted cos i havent finished wrioting it yet! give me a chance lol, i cant even finisht he article before someones trying to get rid of it :P — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jimmythegothfreak (talk • contribs)

Reliable sources that verify the band's notability should be included in the first edit you make when creating a new article. --Onorem♠Dil 15:55, 22 August 2007 (UTC)

hang on, hang on...i tried recreating the article and finding references, but its been deleted yet again before i can even find references! I cant understand why articles actually being written are being deleted before theyre ccompleted. although you're right, i cant seem to find any sources to verify. i thought that by having an album in stores, it made the band's music notable and not in the category for speedy deletion, at least giving the author time to find articles to verify, but it seems yet another user has come along and BOOM! article gone without a chance. I've got a copy of the cd right here in front of me that proves this band is a real band and thier music is notable, most of the info i got from the cd booklet. I saved the article to a word document, should i be able to find verification. You gotta admire wikipedias speed when it comes to quality standards, i guess lol :P anyways, i'll know for next time —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Jimmythegothfreak (talk • contribs) 16:25, August 22, 2007 (UTC).

Similar situation

This is exactly the situation I was in earlier. Johnjoecavanagh 14:30, 24 August 2007 (UTC)

Very true. You had also created an article that did not assert notability and had no reliable sources. --Onorem♠Dil 16:40, 24 August 2007 (UTC)

I wasn't given a chance to assert notability or use reliable sources. A nice little note on the talk page saying: 'You've got until the end of the day to improve this or it will be deleted', rather than blazing through any common human decency most of us possess to delete it to get some kicks. I'm serious about organising a petition - there are enough disenchanted users here who agree with me. Johnjoecavanagh 18:21, 24 August 2007 (UTC)

You were given every chance to assert notability. After the article was deleted the first time, you should have found Reliable sources that verified the creature's notability before creating it again. You shouldn't create an article in the first place without them. Instead, you decided to start in calling people fascists and trying to recruit other people who had their articles (rightfully) deleted instead of trying to fix the problems with your article. --Onorem♠Dil 18:29, 24 August 2007 (UTC)

Good luck with your petition. I'm still wondering why you haven't looked into discussing the deletion policy on its talk page before looking to organize a gang to try to force change somehow. --Onorem♠Dil 18:32, 24 August 2007 (UTC)

Its interesting that you think I was given a chance to find references. In fact, I even cited one, gave the publisher name and everything but it was still deleted because someone arrogantly thought it didn't matter. You do realise that you are one of the tiny minority who support this policy, and that most people who read wikipedia read it for the Oodles of Noodles of this world? Johnjoecavanagh 18:52, 24 August 2007 (UTC)

sblobhering of penis

sorry for being non-elaborate, but sblobhering (käjäytys) is an old finnish tradition to prevent the penis sblobhering by itself. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Basaka (talk • contribs)

You shouldn't be sorry for being non-elaborate. You should be sorry for being a vandal. --Onorem♠Dil 23:16, 22 August 2007 (UTC)

Cort Guitars Link

Hello,

Would you please why did you remove the discussion forum link from the external links?

As you may notice, someone always removing the link.

Cort Guitars

Thank you. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Lastninja (talk • contribs) 15:16, August 23, 2007 (UTC).

Edit: You're right, it is a discussion forum :) I understand after reading the rules. Cheeers. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Lastninja (talk • contribs)

It is not a discussion forum, it just looks like one. It's a commercial store-front which directs people to your online guitars store. Do not fool people here.. --88.106.104.36 22:09, 23 August 2007 (UTC)

It really doesn't matter. It's inappropriate either way. --Onorem♠Dil 22:11, 23 August 2007 (UTC)