Wikipedia:Files for deletion/2007 September 5: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 00:08, 6 September 2007

< September 4	September 6 >

September 5

Image:Jabref-2.2-screenshot.png

Image:Jabref-2.2-screenshot.png (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Mortenalver (notify | contribs).

Moved image to the Commons +mt 01:20, 5 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Blacktown trackplan.png

Image:Blacktown trackplan.png (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Quaidy (notify | contribs).

Unenyclopaedic, information could/should be included in the text. Not appropriate level of information for a general encyclopaedia, or of interest to a general reader. Endarrt 01:54, 5 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Strong Keep Legitimate Content Troll user has appeared out of nowhere and vandalized articles, created numerous bogus ifd's and removed warnings from his talkpage. I believe from this contributions that this user may be a sockpuppet of a Wikipedia prankster, and should be given a checkuser. aliasd·U·T 05:43, 5 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Keep GFDL image used in article. No reason to delete. --Knulclunk 19:36, 5 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Keep it is much easier to include this as a diagram then as text, and it also allows us to supply more detail than practicle in text - the extra detail is, IMO, an advantage. Blood Red Sandman ^{(Talk) (Contribs)} 20:18, 5 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Marayong trackplan.png

Image:Marayong trackplan.png (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Quaidy (notify | contribs).

Unenyclopaedic, information could/should be included in the text. Not appropriate level of information for a general encyclopaedia, or of interest to a general reader. Endarrt 01:56, 5 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Strong Keep Legitimate Content Troll user has appeared out of nowhere and vandalized articles, created numerous bogus ifd's and removed warnings from his talkpage. I believe from this contributions that this user may be a sockpuppet of a Wikipedia prankster, and should be given a checkuser. aliasd·U·T 05:43, 5 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Keep GFDL image used in article. No reason to delete. --Knulclunk 19:36, 5 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Keep it is much easier to include this as a diagram then as text, and it also allows us to supply more detail than practicle in text - the extra detail is, IMO, an advantage. Blood Red Sandman ^{(Talk) (Contribs)} 20:19, 5 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Quaker's Hill trackplan.png

Image:Quaker's Hill trackplan.png (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Quaidy (notify | contribs).

Unenyclopaedic, information could/should be included in the text. Not appropriate level of information for a general encyclopaedia, or of interest to a general reader Endarrt 01:58, 5 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Strong Keep Legitimate Content Troll user has appeared out of nowhere and vandalized articles, created numerous bogus ifd's and removed warnings from his talkpage. I believe from this contributions that this user may be a sockpuppet of a Wikipedia prankster, and should be given a checkuser. aliasd·U·T 05:43, 5 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Keep GFDL image used in article. No reason to delete. --Knulclunk 19:36, 5 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Keep it is much easier to include this as a diagram then as text, and it also allows us to supply more detail than practicle in text - the extra detail is, IMO, an advantage. Blood Red Sandman ^{(Talk) (Contribs)} 20:19, 5 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:PP Fibres & Explosive Spalling.pdf

Image:PP Fibres & Explosive Spalling.pdf (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by TrevorWatkinson (notify | contribs).

CV,UE. I believe this is a CV since it is from a magazine. The person uploading is probably the author, but that cannot be verified, and he probably signed a copyright release when publishing it at the magazine. I do not think it is encyclopedic anyway. -- Basar (talk · contribs) 02:10, 5 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:2688123 main.jpg

Image:2688123 main.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Lynxfs06 (notify | contribs).

Fanmade art for a movie also up for AfD Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Daredevil 2. ThuranX 04:01, 5 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Mmandbass.jpg

Image:Mmandbass.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Hibana (notify | contribs).

previously speedy deletion nominated, user removed tag, deadline expired, still speedy deletion nomination, though time has expired. Ejfetters 04:40, 5 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:003moltres1yx.jpg

Image:003moltres1yx.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Cascade Gonpory (notify | contribs).

States in the description that the character is copyrighted plus no articles link to this file. Calibas 04:39, 5 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- I'm going to nom this for speedy. Blood Red Sandman ^{(Talk) (Contribs)} 14:00, 5 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  - Speedy accepted. Blood Red Sandman ^{(Talk) (Contribs)} 16:36, 5 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:SimonCowell.JPG

Image:SimonCowell.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Tratare (notify | contribs).

Fair use image of living person replaceable with free use image. Ejfetters 04:44, 5 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please see below for discussion on this issue

Delete per Wikipedia:Non-free content 3.6, No. 12. "Pictures of people still alive, groups still active, and buildings still standing; provided that taking a new free picture as a replacement (which is almost always considered possible) would serve the same encyclopedic purpose as the non-free image. However, for some retired or disbanded groups, or retired individuals whose notability rests in part on their earlier visual appearance, a new picture may not serve the same purpose as an image taken during their career." This states what I have been trying to say right here. Ejfetters 06:51, 5 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I withdraw my nomination, as the image is no longer being used to provide commentary on the subject in question, and has been moved to the article's body. Ejfetters 09:57, 5 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:AnneRobinson.JPG

Image:AnneRobinson.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Tratare (notify | contribs).

Fair use image of living person, replaceable with free use image Ejfetters 05:49, 5 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Just so it's known, I am having an issue with Ejfetters on a number of other pages as well, including Simon cowell. It's the same issue as with this page. Let it be known, Ejfetters is in violation of the 3 revert rule, which you're supposed to be blocked for a period of time for. If you will take a look at the Simon Cowell page, he's reverted that same edit over 3 times Here,[1], Here, [2] , Here [3] , and here was his 4th [4] . I explained to him that the image was usable because screen shots were able to be used for critical commentary and discussion, and he continued to revert the page. Further, he called me a vandal for my reverting the page here, in trying informing me to administrators [5] which was totally inapprorpriate, as I didn't even revert the page over 3 times like he did. This is NOT considered vandalism and I think that speaks for itself in regards to his not understanding of wikipedia. I believe he needs to understand that term vandal better. If you'll look at the user's talk page before he blanked it, you will see that he's made numerous mistakes in regards to images and other people have had problems with him removing images as well. Thank you Tratare 06:17, 5 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

If you look at your own link the 4th link, I did not remove the image at all. I simply followed the procedure laid out in this page that states if the image is nominated for deletion to include the tags for the image and the captions if the image is in use. Others have removed fair use images of living persons, I can't remember the policy they quoted me when I uploaded a fair use image for a living actor, but I am researching it. Yes, I make mistakes, and I will continue to make mistakes. That is what this page is for, nomination, and if I am found wrong, then I am wrong. That doesn't mean that I should stop editing because I made mistakes. Ejfetters 06:34, 5 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you! The 4th link has now been corrected to show that Ejfetters did revert the page over 3 times in one day. Tratare 06:41, 5 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

- I dont understand, why are you attacking me here, and not talking about the nomination? This isnt the place for this, I just dont understand why you insist and making this discussion about me and not the nomination of the images. I followed all the guidelines laid out about nominating the images for deletion. I informed you, and tagged them, and now I tagged the images. Ejfetters 06:43, 5 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

How am I attacking you. You're the one who called me a vandal, when I never vandalised any of the pages. I just reverted and I didn't do so over 3 times. That's like libel where legal actions can be taken into effect, dude. I am discussing the nomination because your calling me a vandal had to do with all of this. If you're saying I am attacking you because I am expressing my irritation with you libeling me over the internet, well I have a perfect right to be angry about that. Tratare 06:47, 5 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per Wikipedia:Non-free content 3.6, No. 12. "Pictures of people still alive, groups still active, and buildings still standing; provided that taking a new free picture as a replacement (which is almost always considered possible) would serve the same encyclopedic purpose as the non-free image. However, for some retired or disbanded groups, or retired individuals whose notability rests in part on their earlier visual appearance, a new picture may not serve the same purpose as an image taken during their career." Ejfetters 06:53, 5 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I withdraw my initial nomination for the reason, but I do believe that someone has said on here that publicity images of that nature are inappropriate, which is the reason I have nominated so many. Can someone please shed some light on the subject, so we can get an official stance on it from an admin? Images of this one's nature for subjects such as Star Trek and Dawson's Creek were removed, so is this the same as those were? I think we need proof the image has been explicitly release for such promotional use, is this correct? Forgive me, I am not an admin but trying to become somewhat more helpful in editing non-free material to comply with policies set forth. All edits I made were in good faith, as I was told previously if I nominate an image for deletion and it's being used in the infobox to remove it and replace with one of the templates I used, if its incorrectly done, please let me know, as I don't want to make these good faith edits incorrectly if I can avoid it. Thank you. Ejfetters 10:01, 5 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Just somce constructive criticism on User Ejfetters. May I suggest that user Ejfetters learn the wikipedia policies he enforces, just before going ahead and enforcing them without having a clue about what he's talking about, as proven on my talk page. He could have saved us a lot of confusion and argument these last 8 or 9 hours. While I believe the user is truly trying to help wikipedia and has no bad intent, he causes a great deal of confusion and argument because he admittedly didn't know anything about the policy he was enforcing me about. For instance, he has just done something that he is not sure was correct so if he starts arguing with someone about it, he will just confuse them because he won't know what he's talking about. This is pretty much what has happened tonight. Ejfetters basically tells me, I cant use these images. I say 'why, it seems perfectly fine to me.' He basically said 'he didn't know why either but something similar happened to him." That really wasn't a good enough reason. I sincerely hope an adminn discusses knowing the policies he once to enforce before just trying to enforce them on people. Then administrators won't always have to get involved. He continually told me about a policy and then started telling me go ask administrators because he didn't know. Tratare 10:30, 5 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I will say that he did eventually go and find information and we learned about it together. Hes a good guy. No hard feelings :) Tratare 10:47, 5 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Wikisigbutton.png

Image:Wikisigbutton.png (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Crossmr (notify | contribs).

I think we do not need it, there is same image in commons. I know it used in many where but I'll run my bot to replacing. OsamaK 12:00, 5 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
This point was already raised and we decided that IAR applied and that it should be left. See the image history [6].--Crossmr 12:51, 5 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I know it's used in many where, but that's easy using bot and we do not need two same version. --{{subst:#ifeq:{{subst:NAMESPACE}}|User talk|{{subst:#ifeq:{{subst:PAGENAME}}|OsamaK|O sama K|O sama K^{Reply? on my talk page, please}}}|O sama K}} 13:40, 5 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:0077.jpg

Image:0077.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by 0077.jpg (notify | contribs).

Orphaned, suspected copyvio. Blood Red Sandman ^{(Talk) (Contribs)} 14:13, 5 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Lrh_wii.jpg

Image:Lrh_wii.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Rikkaa (notify | contribs).

Image was uploaded soley to vandalize an article and is now orphaned. Foobaz·o< 14:07, 5 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Caitlin Ryan.jpg

Image:Caitlin Ryan.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Marina T. (notify | contribs).

User attached GNU Free Documentation License to image, though image clearly looks like a studio publicity shot. Copyright violation. Ejfetters 15:17, 5 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Images uploaded by Cascade Gonpory

Fan-made fake Pokemon (etc.) images - Wikipedia is not a hosting service. Unused.

Mike Rosoft 16:35, 5 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Business office icons.jpg

Image:Business office icons.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Mattdogs (notify | contribs).

Orphaned, probably spam (it was added by a WP:SPA), probably non-free (the site it came from says "If you want to use icons for commercial purposes,You have to pay for obtain the author's License agreement." (sic) Transfinite (Talk / Contribs) 00:06, 6 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

@@ Line 109: / Line 109: @@
 *[[:Image:Fire stage 2.png]]
 [[User:Mike Rosoft|Mike Rosoft]] 16:35, 5 September 2007 (UTC)
-{{subst:Ifd2|Business office icons.jpg|Uploader=Mattdogs|Reason=Orphaned, probably spam (it was added by a [[WP:SPA])], probably non-free (the site it came from says "If you want to use icons for commercial purposes,You have to pay for obtain the author's License agreement." (sic) }} [[User:Transfinite|Transfinite]]<small> ([[User talk:Transfinite|Talk]] / [[Special:Contributions/Transfinite|Contribs]])</small> 00:06, 6 September 2007 (UTC)
+====[[:Image:Business office icons.jpg]]====
+:<span class="plainlinksneverexpand lx">[[:Image:{{ucfirst:Business office icons.jpg}}]] ([{{fullurl:Image:Business office icons.jpg|action=delete}} delete] | [[Image talk:{{ucfirst:Business office icons.jpg}}|talk]] | [{{fullurl::Image:{{ucfirst:Business office icons.jpg}}|action=history}} history] | [{{fullurl:Special:Log|page={{urlencode::Image:{{ucfirst:Business office icons.jpg}}}}}} logs])</span> - uploaded by [[User talk:Mattdogs#Image:Business office icons.jpg listed for deletion|Mattdogs]] (<span class="plainlinks">[{{fullurl:User_talk:Mattdogs|action=edit&preload=Template:idw_preload&editintro=Template:idw_editintro&section=new&create=Post+a+comment}} notify]</span> | [[Special:Contributions/Mattdogs|contribs]]).
+*Orphaned, probably spam (it was added by a [[WP:SPA]]), probably non-free (the site it came from says "If you want to use icons for commercial purposes,You have to pay for obtain the author's License agreement." (sic) [[User:Transfinite|Transfinite]]<small> ([[User talk:Transfinite|Talk]] / [[Special:Contributions/Transfinite|Contribs]])</small> 00:06, 6 September 2007 (UTC)