Jump to content

Wikipedia:Files for deletion/2007 September 6

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

September 6

[edit]
Image:Untitled.PNG (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by multiple users (notify | contribs).
  • Has had several unused incarnalitons. Such a blandly named image should be protected. — Jack · talk · 02:31, Thursday, 6 September 2007
Image:Only-on-the-net com.png (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Schwein99
  • Verification was requested on 28 Aug on the image's Talk page that this is a real book. No verification has yet been provided. The uploader's only other edit to Wikipedia was to post the picture in an articlespace page without explanation or context. (By the way, there actually is a book by this title but it's not this one. The author of the real book is David Craig and the cover has a picture of a man in a suit, not a plain red background.)
    The image log asserts that uploader holds the copyright. Please correct me if I'm wrong but I did not think that merely taking the picture yourself voided the original copyright holder's rights to the cover art. Even if this picture can be verified, wouldn't the correct license be one of the fair-use templates? Rossami (talk) 01:24, 6 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Image:Jorts.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Kaus (notify | contribs).
  • The image is clearly intended as a mockery of the subject; in addition to the clear visual evidence, the image's upload history notes that "the original source of the file is from the April 2004 issue of the 'Texas Travesty', the official humor publication of the University of Texas." While I do not object to parody and satire, I do object to such a depiction as the primary and only depiction of a subject. I also question the copyright status but that may be a separate issue. ElKevbo 02:24, 6 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep - So parody and satire is OK, but mockery isn't? I'm unclear as to what guideline or policy on images you feel is being violated with this image. If you think another image would suit the article better, you are of course free to create one. --cholmes75 (chit chat) 14:36, 7 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
And your response to the likely copyright violation...? --ElKevbo 15:07, 7 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
If it's a copyvio it needs to go. Otherwise it can stay. --cholmes75 (chit chat) 17:49, 7 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Image:Ferrell w.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Jabba 1217 (notify | contribs).
Image:Converted richway.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Digitaloutsider (notify | contribs).
  • Non-encyclopedic. Adds nothing of real value to the article, all this is is an abandoned building. Yes the store closed down, but countless corporations have closed locations, serves no real purpose Ejfetters 11:00, 6 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - If Image:TargetLogo.png is deleted, this image that includes the ghost sign of this Target can be used as an example of the old Target logo used from 1968 to 2004. One or the other. -- Guroadrunner 13:08, 6 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
If someone can add a fair use rationale and source to the Image:TargetLogo.png then it will be kept. This would be a very terrible image to use as a corporation's logo, so if the other image is deleted, this one should still be deleted as well, and another picture of the logo replaced from the company's website, with source and rationale listed. Ejfetters 13:52, 6 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
I'll try to remember this task of writing up fair use for the other logo, or see if there are any examples of the red bullseye and black text. I personally believe there is a use in keeping it, but I agree it needs the rationale to stay. Guroadrunner 16:30, 6 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - I've uploaded a SVG of the old logo with a rationale, so I don't see much use of this photo anymore, if noone writes a rationale for it too, that is. Vargklo 23:22, 6 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - I think the article would be better served by deleting this photo. Any previous rationale for keeping it is now gone. Anyone else? Zildgulf 09:07, 21 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Strong Keep - ANY free image we can get is a good one. ViperSnake151 21:40, 3 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - Shows the external appearance of a closed/abandoned Target Store. Dane2007 02:39, 7 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Justification in favor of keeping the image is this: It is a reminder to the public town, village and city officials of what big box retail has really become in today's market. The opening of a Target or similar Big Box retail isn't to serve a need for this kind of retail, it is to draw revenue from neighboring towns. This sounds great to public officials, until they realize it can cost more in pubic services than the tax revenue they anticipated and Big Box can leave town for greener pastures, leaving the town with dark boxes, as shown. Keep the picture. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.131.106.96 (talkcontribs)
Image:Halloween 6PC DVD.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Jason.callaghan86 (notify | contribs).
  • Copyright violation, cover is a bootleg DVD cover, depicting copyrighted images from a copyrighted film. The cover is not official, as the studio never released the alternate version, so a cover for it cannot be official either. Ejfetters 12:06, 6 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Image:Raul Julia LevyJr.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by O'Toole Dupree (notify | contribs).
Image:Raul Julia Levy1.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by O'Toole Dupree (notify | contribs).
  • CV - Image is taken from IMDB page here. Unused image (identical copy of the above). Absentee Uploader - all images by AU up for IFD. Public domain license tag does not appear to be valid. -- Eqdoktor 13:21, 6 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Image:Raul Julia-Levy.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by O'Toole Dupree (notify | contribs).
Image:Mostafaakaad.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Eyas Hajeh (notify | contribs).
  • Copyright violation, user claims they own the photograph, but looks as it is a publicity image, being fair use, and no proof it is owned by the user. Ejfetters 13:34, 6 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
    • Comment - If we can find the original source and copyright holder for the image, and attach the appropriate tag then we should be able to use it since the subject is deceased, but I think we can find a better image of him for this use. There are some interviews in the Halloween H20 and Halloween DVD's that we should be able to get a screencap for him, and they're pretty recent, I just don't have the software to capture the images, anyone to for this. Ejfetters 02:52, 7 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Image:Korolev2.gif (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Night Gyr (notify | contribs).
  • I suggest, this is not original work of NASA. As we know, there are many-many non-NASA images at their sites. We can clearly see Cyrillic (not-English) caption Сергей Павлович КОРОЛЕВ и indecipherable Cyrillic author signature А. ?. Крав???? (may be Кравченко). For what purposes NASA-publisher is printing in Russian? Why NASA staffer is signing in Russian in USA? Alex Spade 15:07, 6 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Image:Adultfriendreview.gif (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Dazznet (notify | contribs).
Image:CoralSmith.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Tratare (notify | contribs).
  • Copyright violation, picture is a screen capture from a television show, has GNU Free Doc. License. No fair use rationale also. Lastly, replaceable with free use image, image is non-free use image provided to identify a living person Ejfetters 20:20, 6 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - We kind of had an issue like this before where Ejfetters nominated images for deletion but changed his mind, mainly do to the fact that he didnt know about the policy he was enforcing. He's made yet another mistake. This is not a picture of Coral Smith while on any television program Tratare 23:13, 6 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - this is a screen capture from MTV's Real World/Road Rules Challenge Reunion Special following the airing of a complete season of the show. The copyright tag claims it is free use. Ejfetters 00:07, 7 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Clarification - Nominator's !vote; be sure not to count it independently. — xDanielx T/C 05:04, 10 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  • addition to above, it is in violation of the following:

1. Wikipedia:Non-free content 3.6, No. 12. "Pictures of people still alive, groups still active, and buildings still standing; provided that taking a new free picture as a replacement (which is almost always considered possible) would serve the same encyclopedic purpose as the non-free image. However, for some retired or disbanded groups, or retired individuals whose notability rests in part on their earlier visual appearance, a new picture may not serve the same purpose as an image taken during their career." Ejfetters 06:53, 5 September 2007 (UTC)
2. Wikipedia:Non-free content 1. Policy, No. 9: Restrictions on location. Non-free content is only allowed in articles (not disambiguation pages), and only in the article namespace. Subject to exemptions. (To prevent an image category from displaying thumbnails, add to it; images are linked, not inlined, from talk pages when they are a topic of discussion.) Ejfetters 00:44, 7 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

    • additional comment. The source listed for the image, the website http://www.realitytvscoop.com/ appears to be using several non-free use images throughout its site, with no disclaimers or copyright information listed that I could find. For this reason I think we should also carefully examine any images uploaded with this site as the source, because the site clearly isn't the original source for it's images, and it makes no claim as to the status of the copyrighted images used. Ejfetters 01:03, 7 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep - but claim as fair use. Alx 91 19:25, 9 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Image:DrSamLoomis.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Dmoon1 (notify | contribs).
  • Non-free image used solely to identify living person in their infobox. If it is deemed that this can be used in the body of the article instead, it is noted that a non-free use screen cap of this character already exists, and can suffice instead. Ejfetters 20:41, 6 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

*Keep I don't understand what you're saying. It is a screencap from the film. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Enter Movie (talkcontribs) 02:35, 7 September 2007 (UTC) [reply]

    • Sorry if I was too vague. Yes I know it's a screencap, but if you go to Sam Loomis page, there's already a screencap there that can be used. We should try to find an image of him out of the role of Dr. Loomis, to better identify him on his biographical page. Since he is no longer living, we may be able to use a fair use image, provided it is cited and source with its original source. Lets try to find one for his page. Ejfetters 02:48, 7 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Image:TimSelwyn.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Midnighttonight (notify | contribs).


Not used, small jpeg. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Vargklo (talkcontribs) 05:41, 7 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]