Talk:History of the Huns

Doesn't this just duplicate what already exists in Huns? Adam Bishop 04:41, 30 June 2006 (UTC)

It is a bit weak. Is there anything of independent value, and if so could it be moved to the main Huns page, with a view to deleting this one? Richard Keatinge 11:10, 17 July 2007 (UTC)

Map

Who drew the map? Why is Danmark, the Baltic region and southern Sweden under Hunnic rule? Where is the evidence for this? Krastain 09:58, 22 October 2006 (UTC)

-I guess this map suggests that since the German peoples were under Hunnic rule, so must have been their territories. However, in the particular areas that can be disputed as being Hunnic, the German peoples must have left during the Migration Period and there wouldn't have been any real dominant peoples, except for the Huns.

I seem to recall Attila claiming rule over the northern islands, presumably on the grounds that he was boss of all Germans anywhere. But the map is definitely dodgy. I note the Jutes are placed in Yorkshire for some reason. Bede puts them on, or off, the south coast. Richard Keatinge 11:10, 17 July 2007 (UTC)

Indeed the second map is grotesquely inaccurate. At the time of the battle of Chalons Kent Anglia and Ebrauc (York) would all still be in Brythonic hands, The Amoricani who where affectively independent at this time (who participated in Chalons) are also falsely recorded as being under Visigoth hands. This particular rewriting of history presumably by Saxonophiles goes beyond even the half fiction history recorded by Gildas centuries later. 70.187.156.140 23:12, 17 July 2007 (UTC) Bloody Sacha 7/17/2007

Name is wrong

There are

Big Hun Imperial State and European Hun State

This article is European Hun State Aceflooder 08:29, 26 October 2006 (UTC)

Category: Nomadic Empires of Central Asia

Ive restored this category as both this article and Huns refers to the people as being "of Central Asia". Aside from the Category itself being misnamed (i.e. the empire was not nomadic) what reason is there for it being removed? Is the category itself being emptied or changed? István 20:42, 1 February 2007 (UTC)

the travel

The huns were traveling with hores and boads to the other countries. The went with boads over the black see so that they could come to >Europ and be there. So they came from Mongolia in to Hungray and then from there to the yet Germany adn the gaul that's now Fance. But when they were on land they went with their horses to other countries. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 212.233.32.85 (talk) 14:32, 11 February 2007 (UTC).

Bulgarian Empire

I strongly object to the comment that Bulgarian Empire was created by remnant Huns. This theory was rejected at least 10 years ago. Please do have in mind that Bulgarian people were nomadic, yes, equstrian, yes, but their participation in Hunnic raids is strongly disputed, to say the least.

```` —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Naurinho (talk • contribs) 10:50, 15 March 2007 (UTC).

Mongolian/Turkic

hey funny fucks... why does it state nowhere else that the Huns are supposed to be Turkic? maybe cause the other articles are locked and you cant edit them with your funny little turkish propaganda? HEHE