Talk:Filoviridae: Difference between revisions
Appearance
Content deleted Content added
Watchingeye (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
Watchingeye (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
The last paragraph (as of 23rd August 2007) uses far too much technical jargon - to the point where even someone (such as myself) with a fair degree of background knowledge in the subject has difficulty understanding it. Can somebody who knows the terminolgy please clarify it to, say, New Scientist levels? [[User:Napalm Llama|Napalm Llama]] 11:03, 23 August 2007 (UTC) |
The last paragraph (as of 23rd August 2007) uses far too much technical jargon - to the point where even someone (such as myself) with a fair degree of background knowledge in the subject has difficulty understanding it. Can somebody who knows the terminolgy please clarify it to, say, New Scientist levels? [[User:Napalm Llama|Napalm Llama]] 11:03, 23 August 2007 (UTC) |
||
==Assesment...again?== |
|||
I added a lot of information and if someone could assess it, I would apriciate it. I fear it's still a start class but please someone assess it. [[User:Watchingeye|Watchingeye]] 00:56, 15 September 2007 (UTC) |
Revision as of 00:57, 15 September 2007
Viruses Start‑class High‑importance | ||||||||||
|
Could somebody with some philological background elaborate on the filo- stem of the word? Thanks.Theharpguy 01:07, 17 January 2007 (UTC)
The last paragraph (as of 23rd August 2007) uses far too much technical jargon - to the point where even someone (such as myself) with a fair degree of background knowledge in the subject has difficulty understanding it. Can somebody who knows the terminolgy please clarify it to, say, New Scientist levels? Napalm Llama 11:03, 23 August 2007 (UTC)