Talk:Voiced postalveolar fricative: Difference between revisions
Appearance
Content deleted Content added
No edit summary |
mNo edit summary |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{WikiProject Phonetics}} |
{{WikiProject Phonetics}} |
||
To me, this recording sounds too much palatalized. [[User:85.221.134.193|85.221.134.193]] 17:03, 14 February 2006 (UTC) |
To me, this recording sounds too much palatalized. [[User:85.221.134.193|85.221.134.193]] 17:03, 14 February 2006 (UTC) |
||
:I second that. --[[User:Zx-man|Zx-man]] 16:40, 16 September 2007 (UTC) |
:I second that. Perhaps I'll record my own pronunciation upon getting a decent microphone. --[[User:Zx-man|Zx-man]] 16:40, 16 September 2007 (UTC) |
||
"In English the sound is labialized, [ʒʷ], although few transcriptions bother with this level of detail." |
"In English the sound is labialized, [ʒʷ], although few transcriptions bother with this level of detail." |
Revision as of 16:42, 16 September 2007
Linguistics Unassessed | ||||||||||
|
To me, this recording sounds too much palatalized. 85.221.134.193 17:03, 14 February 2006 (UTC)
- I second that. Perhaps I'll record my own pronunciation upon getting a decent microphone. --Zx-man 16:40, 16 September 2007 (UTC)
"In English the sound is labialized, [ʒʷ], although few transcriptions bother with this level of detail." Labialised? I don't labialise mine. This might be a (Australian) dialect thing, but I doubt it. Questioned. 150.203.2.85 06:57, 12 October 2006 (UTC)Willjsteed150.203.2.85 06:57, 12 October 2006 (UTC)
Russian/Polish
If you are going to delete the note about Russian (which seeks to clarify a common misunderstanding), you might as well delete the "Note" subsection header as well. But I think it is a net loss of information. --Ziusudra 17:26, 19 December 2006 (UTC)
- I took that out but you're right. It is a common misunderstanding. I'll put it back in. Ƶ§œš¹ [aɪm ˈfɻɛ̃ⁿdˡi] 21:05, 19 December 2006 (UTC)