User talk:Loansince

Welcome!

Hello, Loansince, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• How to edit a page
• Help pages
• Tutorial
• How to write a great article
• Manual of Style
• Create your own wiki

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question and then place {{helpme}} before the question on your talk page. Again, welcome! --Simonkoldyk 00:09, 16 September 2007 (UTC)

Edit warring and the three revert rule

Please be aware that Wikipedia has a three revert rule which means that editors can't undo another editor's work more than three times in any 24-hour period. You have broken the rule on Coral Smith. Edit-warring and revert warring is damaging to Wikipedia and people who break the three revert rule can be blocked from editing in order to allow them to cool down.

Because you are a new user, I don't intend to block you. However, do not rely on being shown leniency in future. Wikipedia works by discussion between editors of differing viewpoints in order to agree a consensus, with everyone being committed to improving the quality of the encyclopaedia. Please continue to constructively discuss your edits and remember to comment on what other people say rather than commenting on them as people. Sam Blacketer 15:48, 26 September 2007 (UTC)

Talk page deletion

While in certain circumstances you can delete comments on your talk page, this is not one of them, and your edit summary in this edit is incivil. I give you warning that if you remove this warning or the previous notice about edit warring, you will be blocked from editing. I also advise you to read Wikipedia civility policy; breaking it can also result in you being blocked. I have shown you leniency for revert warring; please don't try my patience. Sam Blacketer 19:17, 26 September 2007 (UTC)

Blocked for removing warnings

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 3 hours in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for removing warnings from your user talk page. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below.

Sam Blacketer 19:56, 26 September 2007 (UTC)

Lmao! Difference between archiving and removing comments, big guy. You weren't allowed to do that because I archived all that mess out. Never was deleted. I'd stop listening to irritating trolls running around trying to cause trouble, like JTRH, and leave well enough alone or else you will end up making mistakes like this. That's hilarious that my archiving the page got you to break the rules, because now I can tell on you to another administrator. :) Loansince 20:18, 26 September 2007 (UTC)

If you wish to appeal your block you are able to do so. Sam Blacketer 20:24, 26 September 2007 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Loansince (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

Sam Blacketer had no right to block me for archiving a warning and then claiming I deleted it, when it was archived. I do not like the fact that he has accused me of breaking a policy that I never broke and then wonders why I become upset. He's also been entertaining these annoying trolls (JTRH) who won't leave me alone, running around to different talk pages trying to cause trouble rather than doing any editing, and telling people I removed comments from my talk page. Instead of Sam telling these trolls Loansince is not breaking any rules because he is allowed to remove comments from his talk page, he's been entertaining them by adding back the removed comments and then blocking me for telling me I removed warnings when they were archived

Decline reason:

Sock of banned user. — jpgordon^∇∆∇∆ 20:50, 26 September 2007 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

You have been indefinitely blocked from editing in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for Abuse of multiple accounts. If you believe this block is unjustified you may contest this block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below. jpgordon^∇∆∇∆ 20:50, 26 September 2007 (UTC)

This user is asking that their block be reviewed:

Loansince (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

Please! Any administrator out there who's normal and thinks clearly. I have dealt with enough idiots for one day. I now have to report 2 administrators. That just proves how literally messed up wikipedia is. I have to report one administrator for false accusation of removing warnings from my talk page and now I have another administrator to report for accusing me of multiple sockpuppets, when I only have had one account on wikipedia! Help! Please! Only if you know how to do your job as an administrator, look at this

Notes:

• In some cases, you may not in fact be blocked, or your block has already expired. Please check the list of active blocks. If no block is listed, then you have been autoblocked by the automated anti-vandalism systems. Please remove this request and follow these instructions instead for quick attention by an administrator.
• Please read our guide to appealing blocks to make sure that your unblock request will help your case. You may change your request at any time.

Administrator use only:

If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, replace this template with the following, replacing "blocking administrator" with the name of the blocking admin:

{{Unblock on hold |1=blocking administrator |2=Please! Any administrator out there who's normal and thinks clearly. I have dealt with enough idiots for one day. I now have to report 2 administrators. That just proves how literally messed up wikipedia is. I have to report one administrator for false accusation of removing warnings from my talk page and now I have another administrator to report for accusing me of multiple sockpuppets, when I only have had one account on wikipedia! Help! Please! Only if you know how to do your job as an administrator, look at this |3 = ~~~~}}

If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following code, substituting {{subst:Decline reason here}} with a specific rationale. Leaving the decline reason unchanged will result in display of a default reason, explaining why the request was declined.

{{unblock reviewed |1=Please! Any administrator out there who's normal and thinks clearly. I have dealt with enough idiots for one day. I now have to report 2 administrators. That just proves how literally messed up wikipedia is. I have to report one administrator for false accusation of removing warnings from my talk page and now I have another administrator to report for accusing me of multiple sockpuppets, when I only have had one account on wikipedia! Help! Please! Only if you know how to do your job as an administrator, look at this |decline = {{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}

If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting Accept reason here with your rationale:

{{unblock reviewed |1=Please! Any administrator out there who's normal and thinks clearly. I have dealt with enough idiots for one day. I now have to report 2 administrators. That just proves how literally messed up wikipedia is. I have to report one administrator for false accusation of removing warnings from my talk page and now I have another administrator to report for accusing me of multiple sockpuppets, when I only have had one account on wikipedia! Help! Please! Only if you know how to do your job as an administrator, look at this |accept = accept reason here ~~~~}}

}