Jump to content

Distributed generation: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Browse history interactively
← Previous editNext edit →
Content deleted Content added
VisualWikitext
Casito (talk | contribs)
1,894 edits
NPOV tag. I just gotta do it. see talk
Casito (talk | contribs)
1,894 edits
Fact tagging
Line 5: Line 5:
Currently, industrial countries generate most of their electricity in large centralized facilities, such as [[coal]] power plants, [[nuclear reactor]]s, [[hydropower]] or [[combined cycle|gas powered plant]].
Currently, industrial countries generate most of their electricity in large centralized facilities, such as [[coal]] power plants, [[nuclear reactor]]s, [[hydropower]] or [[combined cycle|gas powered plant]].


These plants have excellent economies of scale, but usually transmit electricity long distances. Coal plants do so to prevent pollution of the cities. Nuclear reactors are thought too unsafe to be in a city. Dam sites are often both unsafe, and intentionally far from cities. The coal and nuclear plants are often considered too far away for their waste heat to be used for heating buildings.
These plants have excellent economies of scale, but usually transmit electricity long distances. Coal plants do so to prevent pollution of the cities. Nuclear reactors are thought too unsafe to be in a city. Dam sites are often both unsafe, and intentionally far from cities. The coal and nuclear plants are often considered too far away for their waste heat to be used for heating buildings.


Low pollution is a crucial advantage of [[combined cycle]] plants that burn [[natural gas]]. The low pollution permits the plants to be near enough to a city to be used for [[district heating]] and cooling.
Low pollution is a crucial advantage of [[combined cycle]] plants that burn [[natural gas]]. The low pollution permits the plants to be near enough to a city to be used for [[district heating]] and cooling.


So-called inherently safe [[nuclear reactor]]s such as the [[pebble bed reactor]]s and [[molten salt reactor]]s have no proven safety advantage: They are unlikely to be safe enough to be deployed near cities, nor to be used for process waste heat generation either.{{Fact|date=August 2007}}
So-called inherently safe [[nuclear reactor]]s such as the [[pebble bed reactor]]s and [[molten salt reactor]]s have no proven safety advantage: They are unlikely to be safe enough to be deployed near cities, nor to be used for process waste heat generation either.{{Fact|date=August 2007}}


Distributed generation is another approach. It reduces the amount of energy lost in transmitting electricity because the electricity is generated very near where it is used, perhaps even in the same building. This also reduces the size and number of power lines that must be constructed.
Distributed generation is another approach. It reduces the amount of energy lost in transmitting electricity because the electricity is generated very near where it is used, perhaps even in the same building. This also reduces the size and number of power lines that must be constructed.


Typical distributed power sources have low maintenance, low pollution and high efficiencies. In the past, these traits required dedicated operating engineers, and large, complex plants to pay their salaries and reduce pollution. However, modern [[embedded system]]s can provide these traits with automated operation and clean fuels, such as sunlight, wind and [[natural gas]]. This reduces the size of power plant that can show a profit.
Typical distributed power sources have low maintenance, low pollution and high efficiencies.{{Fact|date=October 2007}} In the past, these traits required dedicated operating engineers, and large, complex plants to pay their salaries and reduce pollution. However, modern [[embedded system]]s can provide these traits with automated operation and clean fuels, such as sunlight, wind and [[natural gas]]. This reduces the size of power plant that can show a profit.


The usual problem with distributed generators are their high costs.
The usual problem with distributed generators are their high costs.


The one exception is probably [[microhydro]]power. A well-designed plant has nearly zero maintenance costs, and generates useful power indefinitely.
The one exception is probably [[microhydro]]power. A well-designed plant has nearly zero maintenance costs, and generates useful power indefinitely.{{Fact|date=October 2007}}


One favored source is [[Photovoltaic module|solar panel]]s on the roofs of buildings. These have high construction costs ($2.50/W, 2007). This is about fiftyfold higher than coal power plants ($0.047/W, 2007) and 40-fold higher than nuclear plants ($0.06/W, 2007). Most solar cells also have waste disposal issues, since solar cells often contain heavy-metal electronic wastes. The plus side is that unlike coal and hydropower, there are no pollution, mining safety or operating safety issues.
One favored source is [[Photovoltaic module|solar panel]]s on the roofs of buildings. These have high construction costs ($2.50/W, 2007). This is about fiftyfold higher than coal power plants ($0.047/W, 2007) and 40-fold higher than nuclear plants ($0.06/W, 2007). Most solar cells also have waste disposal issues, since solar cells often contain heavy-metal electronic wastes. The plus side is that unlike coal and hydropower, there are no pollution, mining safety or operating safety issues.


Another favored source is small [[wind generator|wind turbines]]. These have low maintenance, and low pollution. Construction costs and total safety are also manyfold ($0.80/W, 2007) more per watt than large power plants, except in very windy areas. Wind towers and generators have substantial insurable liabilities caused by high winds, but good operating safety.
Another favored source is small [[wind generator|wind turbines]]. These have low maintenance, and low pollution. Construction costs and total safety are also manyfold ($0.80/W, 2007) more per watt than large power plants, except in very windy areas. Wind towers and generators have substantial insurable liabilities caused by high winds, but good operating safety.


Distributed [[cogeneration]] sources use [[natural gas]]-fired [[microturbine]]s or [[reciprocating engine]]s to turn generators. The hot exhaust is then used for space or water heating, or to drive an [[absorptive chiller]] for [[air-conditioning]]. The clean fuel has only low pollution. Designs currently have uneven reliability, with some makes having excellent maintenance costs, and others being unacceptable.
Distributed [[cogeneration]] sources use [[natural gas]]-fired [[microturbine]]s or [[reciprocating engine]]s to turn generators. The hot exhaust is then used for space or water heating, or to drive an [[absorptive chiller]] {{Fact|date=October 2007}} for [[air-conditioning]]. The clean fuel has only low pollution. Designs currently have uneven reliability,{{Fact|date=October 2007}} with some makes having excellent maintenance costs, and others being unacceptable.


Cogenerators are also more expensive per watt than central generators. They find favor because most buildings already burn fuels, and the cogeneration can extract more value from the fuel.
Cogenerators are also more expensive per watt than central generators. They find favor because most buildings already burn fuels, and the cogeneration can extract more value from the fuel.


Some larger installations utilize [[combined cycle]] generation. Usually this consists of a [[gas turbine]] whose exhaust boils [[water]] for a [[steam turbine]] in a [[Rankine cycle]]. The condenser of the steam cycle provides the heat for space heating or an absorptive chiller. Combined cycle plants with cogeneration have the highest known thermal efficiencies, often exceeding 85%.
Some larger installations utilize [[combined cycle]] generation. Usually this consists of a [[gas turbine]] whose exhaust boils [[water]] for a [[steam turbine]] in a [[Rankine cycle]]. The condenser of the steam cycle provides the heat for space heating or an absorptive chiller. Combined cycle plants with cogeneration have the highest known thermal efficiencies, often exceeding 85%.

Revision as of 21:25, 7 October 2007

Distributed generation generates electricity from many small energy sources. It has also been called also called on-site generation, dispersed generation, embedded generation, decentralized generation, decentralized energy or distributed energy.

Currently, industrial countries generate most of their electricity in large centralized facilities, such as coal power plants, nuclear reactors, hydropower or gas powered plant.

These plants have excellent economies of scale, but usually transmit electricity long distances. Coal plants do so to prevent pollution of the cities. Nuclear reactors are thought too unsafe to be in a city. Dam sites are often both unsafe, and intentionally far from cities. The coal and nuclear plants are often considered too far away for their waste heat to be used for heating buildings.

Low pollution is a crucial advantage of combined cycle plants that burn natural gas. The low pollution permits the plants to be near enough to a city to be used for district heating and cooling.

So-called inherently safe nuclear reactors such as the pebble bed reactors and molten salt reactors have no proven safety advantage: They are unlikely to be safe enough to be deployed near cities, nor to be used for process waste heat generation either.[citation needed]

Distributed generation is another approach. It reduces the amount of energy lost in transmitting electricity because the electricity is generated very near where it is used, perhaps even in the same building. This also reduces the size and number of power lines that must be constructed.

Typical distributed power sources have low maintenance, low pollution and high efficiencies.[citation needed] In the past, these traits required dedicated operating engineers, and large, complex plants to pay their salaries and reduce pollution. However, modern embedded systems can provide these traits with automated operation and clean fuels, such as sunlight, wind and natural gas. This reduces the size of power plant that can show a profit.

The usual problem with distributed generators are their high costs.

The one exception is probably microhydropower. A well-designed plant has nearly zero maintenance costs, and generates useful power indefinitely.[citation needed]

One favored source is solar panels on the roofs of buildings. These have high construction costs ($2.50/W, 2007). This is about fiftyfold higher than coal power plants ($0.047/W, 2007) and 40-fold higher than nuclear plants ($0.06/W, 2007). Most solar cells also have waste disposal issues, since solar cells often contain heavy-metal electronic wastes. The plus side is that unlike coal and hydropower, there are no pollution, mining safety or operating safety issues.

Another favored source is small wind turbines. These have low maintenance, and low pollution. Construction costs and total safety are also manyfold ($0.80/W, 2007) more per watt than large power plants, except in very windy areas. Wind towers and generators have substantial insurable liabilities caused by high winds, but good operating safety.

Distributed cogeneration sources use natural gas-fired microturbines or reciprocating engines to turn generators. The hot exhaust is then used for space or water heating, or to drive an absorptive chiller [citation needed] for air-conditioning. The clean fuel has only low pollution. Designs currently have uneven reliability,[citation needed] with some makes having excellent maintenance costs, and others being unacceptable.

Cogenerators are also more expensive per watt than central generators. They find favor because most buildings already burn fuels, and the cogeneration can extract more value from the fuel.

Some larger installations utilize combined cycle generation. Usually this consists of a gas turbine whose exhaust boils water for a steam turbine in a Rankine cycle. The condenser of the steam cycle provides the heat for space heating or an absorptive chiller. Combined cycle plants with cogeneration have the highest known thermal efficiencies, often exceeding 85%.

In countries with high pressure gas distribution, small turbines can be used to bring the gas pressure to domestic levels whilst extracting useful energy. If the UK were to implement this countrywide an additional 2-4GWe would become available. (Note that the energy is already being generated elsewhere to provide the high initial gas pressure - this method simply distributes the energy via a different route.)

See also

Template:Energy related development

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Distributed_generation&oldid=162947564"