User talk:Iosef

—————————————— Iosef's talk page ——————————————
Leave a message

This is the Talk page for communicating with user Iosef Please sign your comments using four tildes (~~~~), and give comments that start a new topic ==A Descriptive Header==, placing them at the bottom of the page. If you're new to Wikipedia, please see Welcome to Wikipedia. You're encouraged to create an account and look at the Tutorial, but feel free to just jump in and be bold, if you don't have any frequently asked questions. Talk page guidelines Please respect Wikiquette, which means above all assume good faith and be nice, and bear in mind what Wikipedia is not. Cossack talk page Fair enough, I wasn't familiar with the background.radek 23:44, 8 February 2007 (UTC) Category:Language user templates Your userpage is not a LUT, please take it out of this category. -23PatPeter*∞ 22:56, 14 March 2007 (UTC) I believe it is Template:User ase-3, if you have an affiliation with this one please tell me because if not there is another problem. -23PatPeter*∞ 00:36, 15 March 2007 (UTC) Please, no infoboxes for classical works. Hello Iosef, Would you please consult the discussion at Wikipedia:Templates for deletion/Log/2007 March 31 which indicates a consensus that there should be no infoboxes for works of classical music. Yours sincerely, Opus33 03:05, 11 April 2007 (UTC) <followup> Well, the basic reason is given in the discussion for the deletion of the template: pieces of classical music are so different that there is no reasonable set of properties that could make for a useful infobox. Thanks for looking over those Haydn-related articles and making fixes. Yours truly, Opus33 04:44, 12 April 2007 (UTC) Guyot Hi, you reverted some vandalism on guyot today, but you left most of the vandalism in place. In particular, an entire paragrah had been deleted from the article, and the words "a guyotItalic text is a piece of poop with pea in it and people eat it" had been inserted at the end. Thank you for fighting vandalism, but please, try to check articles more carefully when reverting, and make sure to revert all the way back to the last non-vandalized version. Thanks. --Seattle Skier (See talk tierS) 07:07, 26 April 2007 (UTC) Lake Forest Academy You apparently reverted a perfectly correct addition to some alternate athletics programs that I made regarding my own school. I'm not sure what that was about, but for future reference, please dont' delete it; it is not vandalism. Fair use rationale for Image:UnsaidDVD.jpg Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:UnsaidDVD.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use. Suggestions on how to do so can be found here. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page. If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. ShakespeareFan00 21:21, 22 June 2007 (UTC) Orphaned non-free image (Image:Girlsnextdoorlogo.jpg) Thanks for uploading Image:Girlsnextdoorlogo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media). If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 21:39, 10 July 2007 (UTC) Orphaned non-free image (Image:Girlsnextdoorlogo.jpg) Thanks for uploading Image:Girlsnextdoorlogo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media). If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 11:53, 20 July 2007 (UTC) WikiProject Pharmacology Collaboration of the Week WikiProject Pharmacology is currently organizing a new Collaboration of the Week program, designed to bring drug and medication related articles up to featured status. We're currently soliciting nominations and/or voting on nominations for the first WP:RxCOTW, to begin on September 5, 2007. Please stop by the Pharmacology Collaboration of the Week page to participate! Thanks! Dr. Cash 17:49, 1 September 2007 (UTC) Pharmacology Collaboration of the Week Aspirin has been selected as this week's Pharmacology Collaboration of the Week! Please help us bring this article up to featured standards during the week. The goal is to nominate this at WP:FAC on September 10, 2007. Also, please visitWP:RxCOTW to support other articles for the next COTW. Articles that have been nominated thus far include Doxorubicin, Paracetamol (in the lead with 4 support votes so far), Muscle relaxant, Ethanol, and Bufotenin. In other news: Bupropion has been promoted to featured status on August 31, 2007. The Wikipedia:WikiProject Pharmacology main page has been updated and overhauled, to make it easier to find things, as well as to highlight other goals and announcements for the project. Garrondo is asking for individuals to help review Therapies for multiple sclerosis, as he is considering nominating this article for GA status. Fvasconcellos notes that discussion is ongoing regarding the current wording of MEDMOS on including dosage information in drug articles. All input is welcome. Dr. Cash 00:47, 5 September 2007 (UTC) WikiProject Pharmacology Update Here's a brief update in some of the recent developments of WikiProject Pharmacology! Aspirin has just completed its two week run as the first Collaboration of the Week! Many thanks to those editors that contributed; the article got a lot of good work accomplished, and in particular, much work was done in fixing up the history section. It's still not quite "done" yet (is a wikipedia article really ever done?), but after two weeks I think it's more important to push onwards with the development of the new collaboration of the week program. I will be fixing up Aspirin in the next few days and possibly nominating it for either GA or FA status. Muscle relaxant has been selected as the new Collaboration of the week until October 2, 2007! This article is currently rated as a "stub", so it's got quite a bit of work cut out for collaborators! Admittedly, featured status could be a long way off,... but still attainable! At the least, maybe we could at least get it up to meeting the Good article criteria? Please stop by the article and help improve it. Resveratrol, having recently achieved GA status on August 16, 2007, is now making a run for featured status. This is quite a fascinating compound. If you can, please stop by its discussion page and leave comments in support of it. Please remember that Wikipedia is not a forum for discussing or dispensing medical advice amongst users. Specifically, talk pages of articles should only be used to discuss improving the actual article in question. To help alleviate this situation, the template {{talkheader}} may be added to the top of talk pages, reminding users of the purpose of such pages. Additionally, unsigned comments and comments by anonymous users that are inappropriate may be removed from talk pages without being considered vandalism. There was an interesting article on ZDNet last week about Hewlett Packard licensing its patented microneedle technology used in common inkjet printers to be used in transdermal patches to deliver a time-controlled release of drugs to patients. This information could be added to articles such as route of administration or drug delivery. You are receiving this message because you are listed as one of the participants of WikiProject Pharmacology. Dr. Cash 04:59, 19 September 2007 (UTC) Kuban Cossacks discussion There's an argument in the Kuban Cossacks article talk page. Feel free to state your opinion here. M.V.E.i. 19:10, 25 September 2007 (UTC) As i understood you are Russian so... Could you please help with the Russian martial arts thing? I will tell you the problems: 1. Russian martial arts article needs referencing, and i couldn't find thise. 2. There are articles about martial arts in Russian that need to be translated to English. After translated to English, they also need to be referenced and expanded (the demends on the English Wikipedia are higher). Those articles are: [1], [2], [3]. If you can't do that, then please leave that messege to someone who can help here. Thank you. PocketMoon 17:25, 12 October 2007 (UTC)