Jump to content

Talk:Chapman University School of Law: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
No edit summary
→‎Spamming?: new section
Line 34: Line 34:


-- Also, this is not a newly formed account. I've had it for years -- although I use it sparingly.
-- Also, this is not a newly formed account. I've had it for years -- although I use it sparingly.

== Spamming? ==

So ... when you reduce the amount of meaningful information about this Law School, its _editing_, but when I *improve* it, its _spamming_.

If you are going to float such accusation, you need to me the article more comprehensive, not less so.

Revision as of 23:34, 12 October 2007

WikiProject iconCalifornia Unassessed
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject California, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of California on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
???This article has not yet received a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
???This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

ABA Approved

I changed the article to read that Chapman is the only fully ABA approved law school in Orange County, Ca, because the other two, Western State and Whittier, are either provisionally accredited or on probation. It merits a mention, but dunno if it is mentioned in the proper place. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.120.227.194 (talkcontribs) 18:47, 18 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I think its fine to say that its the only fully ABA approved law school in Orange County, but I don't think it should talk about the other two --if anything it makes Chapman sound like it has an inferiority complex, which I doubt it does considering the issues its competition in having. --Bobak 15:00, 19 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I have added more information, to provide a more complete picture of this University, on a level with other law schools in the area, such as Loyola Marymount. 10/12/07 —Preceding unsigned comment added by Hyperion357 (talkcontribs) 07:54, 12 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

No, you've added several paragraphs of advertising and POV, plagiarized directly from the Chapman website. In accordance with Wiki standards, it has been removed. --Eleemosynary 19:17, 12 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Updates to Page

I've added more information about this university, correct to the best of my information, about this university -- trying to bring it on track with neighboring, comparable, law schools Hyperion357 07:57, 12 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

No, you've added several paragraphs of advertising and POV, plagiarized directly from the Chapman website. In accordance with Wiki standards, it has been removed. --Eleemosynary 19:17, 12 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You stated:

No, you've added several paragraphs of advertising and POV, plagiarized directly from the Chapman website. In accordance with Wiki standards, it has been removed. --Eleemosynary 19:17, 12 October 2007 (UTC)

Advertising?

Everything now stated is true.

POV?

What statements are subjective in nature? Point them out, and I will edit them. To my knowledge, everything stated is objectively true, and, hence, no POV.

Plagiarized?

I'm concerned about the paucity of information about this fine institution, and have received permission to draw from their website.

If you have permission, and citation, then its plargiarized.

-- Also, this is not a newly formed account. I've had it for years -- although I use it sparingly.

Spamming?

So ... when you reduce the amount of meaningful information about this Law School, its _editing_, but when I *improve* it, its _spamming_.

If you are going to float such accusation, you need to me the article more comprehensive, not less so.