Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/BNSF 7687: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 23:38, 3 November 2007

Contested prod. A non notable locomotive.

Delete or Merge and redirect to an UNLINKED list article, maybe List of BNSF locomotives. These and other non-notable locomotives could be merged to a list article per WP:LIST guidelines and Wikipedia:Deletion policy#Merging instructions; that is often how such items are handled. --Jayron32|talk|contribs 17:03, 3 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Ack. Not a notable locomotive. There's no need to redirect it. I don't see enough people searching for the term to warrant it. i (talk) 19:41, 3 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, NN locomotive. Wikipedia is not a directory of rolling stock. There are plenty of railfan websites for this material (though I have no idea if any are wikis, which would be useful). --Dhartung | Talk 21:29, 3 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, fails WP:N. Doctorfluffy 23:12, 3 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Comment notification left on Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Trains. Slambo (Speak) 23:30, 3 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Wonderful. Now we'll get floods of rail-lovers who will outnumber all comments based in policy. i (talk) 23:38, 3 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

@@ Line 10: / Line 10: @@
 *'''Delete''', fails [[WP:N]]. [[User:Doctorfluffy|Doctorfluffy]] 23:12, 3 November 2007 (UTC)
 *'''Comment''' notification left on [[Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Trains]]. [[User:Slambo|Slambo]] <small><font color="black">[[User talk:Slambo|(Speak)]]</font></small> 23:30, 3 November 2007 (UTC)
+:*Wonderful. Now we'll get floods of rail-lovers who will outnumber all comments based in policy. '''[[User:I|i]] [[User talk:I|<font color="Black">(talk)</font>]]''' 23:38, 3 November 2007 (UTC)