Jump to content

Talk:Cyber Sunday (2007): Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
TJ Spyke (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Line 8: Line 8:
Lets comprimise. We write after two batista bombs and add a subnote saying he went for the pin on the first one.(not in those exact words.) <small>—Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:Masterman4|Masterman4]] ([[User talk:Masterman4|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Masterman4|contribs]]) 20:59, 6 November 2007 (UTC)</small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
Lets comprimise. We write after two batista bombs and add a subnote saying he went for the pin on the first one.(not in those exact words.) <small>—Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:Masterman4|Masterman4]] ([[User talk:Masterman4|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Masterman4|contribs]]) 20:59, 6 November 2007 (UTC)</small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
:But that's not accurate. The whole point is to list the move used to win the match. The first Batista Bomb did not do that since he went for a pinfall attempt and failed. If he had used the 2 Batista Bombs in a row, that would be different. '''<span style="border: 2px Maroon solid;background:#4682B4;font-family: Monotype Corsiva">[[User:TJ Spyke|<font color="Maroon">TJ</font>]] [[User talk:TJ Spyke|<font color="Maroon">Spyke</font>]]</span>''' 00:06, 7 November 2007 (UTC)
:But that's not accurate. The whole point is to list the move used to win the match. The first Batista Bomb did not do that since he went for a pinfall attempt and failed. If he had used the 2 Batista Bombs in a row, that would be different. '''<span style="border: 2px Maroon solid;background:#4682B4;font-family: Monotype Corsiva">[[User:TJ Spyke|<font color="Maroon">TJ</font>]] [[User talk:TJ Spyke|<font color="Maroon">Spyke</font>]]</span>''' 00:06, 7 November 2007 (UTC)

What about edges spears back at new years rev.

Revision as of 22:22, 8 November 2007

WikiProject iconProfessional wrestling B‑class Low‑importance
WikiProject iconCyber Sunday (2007) is within the scope of WikiProject Professional wrestling, an attempt to improve and standardize articles related to professional wrestling. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, visit the project to-do page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and contribute to discussions.
BThis article has been rated as B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
LowThis article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Batista Bomb

Yes Batista did do two Batista Bombs, but then went for a pin and Undertaker kicked out. Batista 1 Batista Bomb and then got the win [1]. It should not say he pinned Undertaker after 2 Batista Bombs, it should say he won after a Batista Bomb. TJ Spyke 00:36, 3 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This does not matter. It was still two consecutive finishers. Batista didn't win after one powerbomb, he won after TWO. --Maestro25 06:23, 5 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
I explained this on an IP's talkpage. I will use an analagy to make this simple. You know the 1UP trick in certain Mario games? If you jump on two enemies and then miss, the count is reset. The same thing happens here; when Batista went for the pinfall attempt, that "reset" it. He did NOT hit two consecutive Batista Bombs. He hit 1 went for a pin, then went for another Batista Bomb. TJ Spyke 06:27, 5 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Lets comprimise. We write after two batista bombs and add a subnote saying he went for the pin on the first one.(not in those exact words.) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Masterman4 (talkcontribs) 20:59, 6 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

But that's not accurate. The whole point is to list the move used to win the match. The first Batista Bomb did not do that since he went for a pinfall attempt and failed. If he had used the 2 Batista Bombs in a row, that would be different. TJ Spyke 00:06, 7 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

What about edges spears back at new years rev.