Talk:Faerûn: Difference between revisions

Browse history interactively

← Previous edit Next edit →

Content deleted Content added

VisualWikitext

Inline

Revision as of 03:42, 14 November 2007

Dungeons & Dragons Unassessed

This article is within the scope of the Dungeons & Dragons WikiProject, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Dungeons & Dragons-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, or join the discussion, where you can join the project and find out how to help!Dungeons & DragonsWikipedia:WikiProject Dungeons & DragonsTemplate:WikiProject Dungeons & DragonsDungeons & Dragons articles

???

This article has not yet received a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.

???

This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

D&D to-do:

view

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Merge : Various articles
Stubs : Dungeoneer's Survival Guide, Swords & Spells, Variant Dungeons & Dragons games, More...
Update : Rewrite to be out-of-universe: Companions of the Hall, Dark Sun, Elf (Dungeons & Dragons)
Verify : add sources to novels planned for merge to List of Dragonlance novels
Other : Collaboration: Dave Arneson, Drow (Dungeons & Dragons)

Forgotten Realms places is a subcategory of Forgotten Realms there is no need to have both. Being in FR places the article is automatically in FR. 129.132.134.107 09:11, 18 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Evermeet farther?

How are you coming to the conclusion that the 3e map shows Evermeet as closer than the 2e map when Evermeet isn't even on the map? Rogue 9 09:14, 20 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I'm new to this discussion, but Evermeet had beend removed from the map for a very pragmatic reason: to much ocean in the map. This is stated somewhere at wizards.com
David Latapie (✒ | @) 12:22, 2 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Why deleting the maps?

Why had the maps been deleted? Aren't they fair use?
David Latapie (✒ | @) 12:22, 2 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Same question, seriouslly, bring it back(there's at least 100 sites with that map on them so it should be fair use, if not, someone should contact wizards of the coast or whoever, and get permission). I've never seen an artical talk about the geography of a place and not have a reference map. --Wilson 17:21, 10 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

That's because you can't copyright real geography. Fictional geography, on the other hand, you can. --Agamemnon2 22:05, 10 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Very true, the last part was to state how a map is needed for this artical. Seeing as it is copy righted, I will try to get permission for it's inclusion from the developer, but if all else fails we should at least have a link to a site that has the map.--Wilson 15:18, 12 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

It's not about the law at all, actually, it's just about Wikipedia's intent to have all free content. Even though fair use articles are perfectly legal, they aren't free, so that's why they are discouraged on Wikipedia for altruistic reasons.--Neverpitch 03:42, 14 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Revision as of 15:18, 12 May 2007 edit Wilson(cc) (talk \| contribs) Extended confirmed users 519 edits →Why deleting the maps? ← Previous edit		Revision as of 03:42, 14 November 2007 edit undo Neverpitch (talk \| contribs) 97 edits →Why deleting the maps? Next edit →
Line 16:		Line 16:

	::*Very true, the last part was to state how a map is needed for this artical. Seeing as it is copy righted, I will try to get permission for it's inclusion from the developer, but if all else fails we should at least have a link to a site that has the map.--[[User:Wilson(cc)\|Wilson]] 15:18, 12 May 2007 (UTC)		::*Very true, the last part was to state how a map is needed for this artical. Seeing as it is copy righted, I will try to get permission for it's inclusion from the developer, but if all else fails we should at least have a link to a site that has the map.--[[User:Wilson(cc)\|Wilson]] 15:18, 12 May 2007 (UTC)

			:::*It's not about the law at all, actually, it's just about Wikipedia's intent to have all free content. Even though fair use articles are perfectly legal, they aren't free, so that's why they are discouraged on Wikipedia for altruistic reasons.--[[User:Neverpitch\|Neverpitch]] 03:42, 14 November 2007 (UTC)