Jump to content

User talk:Jeff Schweitzer: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
→‎Your recent edits: Decline unblock
No edit summary
Line 26: Line 26:


::By the way, I had to delete [[Jeff Schweitzer]] as it was entirely a copyright violation from [http://www.jeffschweitzer.com/author.php]. Wikipedia does not accept copyrighted contributions, unless you agree to release the copyright under the [[GFDL]]. But don't bother releasing the copyright if you own it: Wikipedia would not accept such a contribution anyway, as the consensus at the AfD shows. [[User:Mangojuice|Mango]][[Special:Contributions/Mangojuice|<span style="color:orange">'''juice'''</span>]]<sup>[[User talk:Mangojuice|talk]]</sup> 15:08, 15 November 2007 (UTC)
::By the way, I had to delete [[Jeff Schweitzer]] as it was entirely a copyright violation from [http://www.jeffschweitzer.com/author.php]. Wikipedia does not accept copyrighted contributions, unless you agree to release the copyright under the [[GFDL]]. But don't bother releasing the copyright if you own it: Wikipedia would not accept such a contribution anyway, as the consensus at the AfD shows. [[User:Mangojuice|Mango]][[Special:Contributions/Mangojuice|<span style="color:orange">'''juice'''</span>]]<sup>[[User talk:Mangojuice|talk]]</sup> 15:08, 15 November 2007 (UTC)

Well, I can now, since you told me that digtair uploaed my picture. That would be Digital Reliability, a company that manages some of my websites. I asked them to upload my photo for me, and they did so. I also asked them to "wikify" my entry, and they did. I have no relationship with them other than that, and did not know that "digitair" was digital reliability. I did not in any way influence their contribution to the "delete" debate - they have a right to support me if they wish. They are not a sock puppet, nor am I. They are independent of my opinions. I have NO idea what copyright violations you are talking about; I have not violated any copyright on my website. I have permission to post my appearances on CNN and Greg Mantell, if that is what you are talking about. I already agreed to release copyright under GFDL for all that I own. This has really become a personal attack rather than reasonable discussion. I have to move on to more productive endeavours. I wish you the best of luck. [[User:Jeff Schweitzer|Jeff Schweitzer]] 15:54, 15 November 2007 (UTC)

Revision as of 15:54, 15 November 2007

Welcome!

Hello, Jeff Schweitzer, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question and then place {{helpme}} before the question on your talk page. Again, welcome! AecisBrievenbus 23:28, 11 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Jeff Schweitzer

An article that you have been involved in editing, Jeff Schweitzer, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jeff Schweitzer. Thank you. AecisBrievenbus 00:46, 12 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You have been accused of sockpuppetry. Please refer to Wikipedia:Suspected sock puppets/Jeff Schweitzer for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with notes for the suspect before editing the evidence page.Template:Do not delete

Your recent edits

Hi there. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. On many keyboards, the tilde is entered by holding the Shift key, and pressing the key with the tilde pictured. You may also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your name and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you! --SineBot 01:31, 15 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Jeff Schweitzer (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

I am not digitair, or whatever that is; I did not sign due a simple lack of understanding the protocol; I started signing when I was informed I should. I am not a sock puppet! The use of "do not delete" seems natural for more than one user since the others say "delete", or maybe digitar simply copied the code before writing his or her message; oops, forgot to sign, my apologies Jeff Schweitzer 14:04, 15 November 2007 (UTC)

Decline reason:

Digitalr appears to be a meatpuppet at the very least, see WP:SOCK. On top of this, you have a blatant conflict of interest and have apparently violated copyright or at least, have copied content from other sources. — Yamla 15:41, 15 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

The user User:Digitalr is clearly related to you in some way - do you know this person? They created their account within a week of when you created yours, and both of you seem to have an interest only in Jeff Schweitzer. Also, I note that Digitalr uploaded the picture you uploaded to commons, claiming the copyright as his (but then releasing it under GFDL as you had done). Can you explain this? Mangojuicetalk 14:58, 15 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
By the way, I had to delete Jeff Schweitzer as it was entirely a copyright violation from [1]. Wikipedia does not accept copyrighted contributions, unless you agree to release the copyright under the GFDL. But don't bother releasing the copyright if you own it: Wikipedia would not accept such a contribution anyway, as the consensus at the AfD shows. Mangojuicetalk 15:08, 15 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Well, I can now, since you told me that digtair uploaed my picture. That would be Digital Reliability, a company that manages some of my websites. I asked them to upload my photo for me, and they did so. I also asked them to "wikify" my entry, and they did. I have no relationship with them other than that, and did not know that "digitair" was digital reliability. I did not in any way influence their contribution to the "delete" debate - they have a right to support me if they wish. They are not a sock puppet, nor am I. They are independent of my opinions. I have NO idea what copyright violations you are talking about; I have not violated any copyright on my website. I have permission to post my appearances on CNN and Greg Mantell, if that is what you are talking about. I already agreed to release copyright under GFDL for all that I own. This has really become a personal attack rather than reasonable discussion. I have to move on to more productive endeavours. I wish you the best of luck. Jeff Schweitzer 15:54, 15 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]