Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Interac (Japan): Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 07:19, 16 November 2007

The company fails WP:ORG, and fails to show why it is notable. Delete J 03:43, 16 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Japan-related deletions. —DAJF 05:55, 16 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: Per the nom; fails to assert notability. - Rjd0060 04:17, 16 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Keep; no reason to delete, not written like an ad, 1 500 foreigners use the service to teach in Japan (establishes notability), this is the third time that the same editor has tried to delete the article. --Ckatz^chat_spy 05:45, 16 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - Employing over 1,000 foreign teachers in Japan alone makes this company pretty notable. --DAJF 05:49, 16 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy Keep- this is actually the fourth time the nominator has tried to delete this article, an overturned speedy, two contested prods, now this-I am now calling this what it is-extremely bad faith nom by GreenJoe, and I wonder what the agenda is. Chris 06:04, 16 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - So many foreigners work at Interac. I hardly see what is notable about that. As is, the article reads like the companies own webpage - an advertisement? Also, simply because GreenJoe has nominated it several times for deletion does NOT mean imply bad faith. It's quite possible that the article just does not belong here.DDD DDD 07:19, 16 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

@@ Line 11: / Line 11: @@
 *'''Keep''' - Employing over 1,000 foreign teachers in Japan alone makes this company pretty notable. --[[User:DAJF|DAJF]] 05:49, 16 November 2007 (UTC)
 *'''Speedy Keep'''- this is actually the '''fourth''' time the nominator has tried to delete this article, an overturned speedy, two contested prods, now this-I am now calling this what it is-extremely '''bad faith''' nom by GreenJoe, and I wonder what the agenda is. [[User:Kintetsubuffalo|Chris]] 06:04, 16 November 2007 (UTC)
+*'''Delete''' - So many foreigners work at Interac. I hardly see what is notable about that. As is, the article reads like the companies own webpage - an advertisement? Also, simply because GreenJoe has nominated it several times for deletion does NOT mean imply bad faith. It's quite possible that the article just does not belong here.[[User:DDD DDD|DDD DDD]] 07:19, 16 November 2007 (UTC)