Talk:Red vs. Blue: Difference between revisions
Gretnablues (talk | contribs) |
|||
Line 132: | Line 132: | ||
:No, because that's the Halo universe, not the Red vs Blue universe. [[User:CapDac|Dac]] 21:49, 15 November 2007 (UTC) |
:No, because that's the Halo universe, not the Red vs Blue universe. [[User:CapDac|Dac]] 21:49, 15 November 2007 (UTC) |
||
Its the same universe and when you think about it kinda make sence. The Spartan III were made cheeply and quickly and when the war finished the UNSC probably made go against each over. |
Revision as of 19:18, 16 November 2007
|
|
A note about character descriptions (please do not archive for now)
In the past, several edits to the character descriptions have been reverted. Please keep in mind that the summaries here are meant to be very short (no more than 2-3 sentences per main character, and little more than a sentence per supporting characters) descriptions of a character's most important traits, usually personality traits. Specific plot details are better left to the List of characters in Red vs Blue. Other things that have been rejected are:
- Other names for the Alien. Those are non-canonical. Just because Caboose calls a character a name doesn't mean that name is sanctioned (otherwise, Donut might as well be called Lieutenant McMuffin).
- Armor colors. These are considered to be too much detail, and can be gleaned from the screenshots anyway.
- Bit characters (characters who do not appear in more than one episode).
— TKD::Talk 06:52, 17 March 2006 (UTC)
Changes, August 8, 2007
Just to explain a couple of things that might not have been obvious from my edits:
- Since the release of episode 100 has actually now occurred, the April 1 announcement is no longer as relevant, especially not in the lead. Same goes for Ramsey's quote about "as many episodes as we can".
- The prose paragraphs of the Red and Blue Team characters are meant to summarize the four recurring characters on each team. Sister really didn't belong in that paragraph.
— TKD::Talk 03:16, 8 August 2007 (UTC)
Series continuation?
I think the 'follow-up mini-series' thing regarding the new Halo 3 lead-in videos should be dropped, or at least re-worded. It makes it sound like the show is picking up where it left off; essentially continuing the story or starting a new one; but it's not. It only exists to promote Halo 3. It is, essentially, a set of new PSAs, and thus doesn't belong in the same section with the actual series seasons.— Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.0.177.159 (talk • contribs)
- Good point...should we move it to the Special Videos page then? Dac 09:28, 9 August 2007 (UTC)
- That sounds like a good idea. — TKD::Talk 09:32, 9 August 2007 (UTC)
- Does anyone have a direct link to any of the videos? I can't find them to comment on them. -- Viewdrix 16:46, 9 August 2007 (UTC)
- They can be found here http://www.gamestop.com/gs/halo3/halo3.asp. I moved the section to the special videos page, but I miss-remembered the information provided in the reference and put it in the Bungie/Microsoft section. That might not be the best place so long as there is nothing directly saying they sponsored it. Ccs4ever 08:05, 19 August 2007 (UTC)
Userboxes
I've made these based off of the T-shirts:
Comments? Bahamut0013 16:38, 15 August 2007 (UTC)
We need one. It no longer exsists. --Shadow 20:51, 26 August 2007 (UTC)
- We don't. It was deleted for very good reasons.--Drat (Talk) 21:18, 26 August 2007 (UTC)
- In reality, there are some aspects of that list that might have been useful. But the focus should be on added relevant prose to Red vs. Blue production. Rooster Teeth did (and documented) some creative things with the Halo maps worth noting, but the list was a bad way to present that information, and ended up over-emphasizing really trivial details. — TKD::Talk 08:00, 27 August 2007 (UTC)
Production as a separate article
Just wanted to get others' feelings on this: Zxcvbnm placed merge tags here and on Red vs. Blue production; I see where the proposal is coming from, but I'm not sure that I agree, given that many sources (including the ones cited in this article) cover the production process heavily, so that it would seem to meet general notability guidelines. Thoughts? — TKD::Talk 13:22, 1 September 2007 (UTC)
- Not to mention, it'd have to be trimmed down if it were merged, to avoid dominating the main article. Keep them separate.--Drat (Talk) 15:13, 1 September 2007 (UTC)
- Production is in need of an update, but once that happens, it could easily be approximately one third to half as long as the main Red vs. Blue article. There have been many small changes made to improve the production values of the series over time, all of fairly equal importance to cover somewhere. It'd be far too difficult to cram the significant details of how they've changed their process from their origin until the end. Keep separate. -- Viewdrix 18:41, 1 September 2007 (UTC)
- I've removed the merge tags per this discussion and listed a few third-party sources at Talk:Red vs. Blue production. — TKD::Talk 07:28, 2 September 2007 (UTC)
Red vs. Blue 2 joke
My understanding was that the information on RVB2 was removed because it is believed to be a joke. My question is if there has been any actual post by the Rooster Teeth crew that confirms that it was or was not a joke? The Filmaker 17:34, 1 September 2007 (UTC)
- Yes. The forum mod Dimono (of roostertooths.com) took it seriously, but now claims Geoff Ramsay sent him a message that it was just a joke. I believe it's a sponsor thread, though. -- Viewdrix 18:35, 1 September 2007 (UTC)
- In either case, it'd be a bit of crystal-balling and original research to interpret the alternate ending that way. If new developments occur, we'd know soon enough. — TKD::Talk 07:02, 2 September 2007 (UTC)
Red vs. Blue
There is a dungeon in Guild Wars with references to Red vs. Blue in the NPC names and the polar war between two sides in the dungeon. [1]. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 58.110.138.223 (talk) 06:47, 13 September 2007 (UTC)
- That'd be good to include, but only if we can find a reliable source for it. — TKD::Talk 17:35, 13 September 2007 (UTC)
Episode 0??
Why did no one mention Episode 0? I can't find it anywhere, should it be in season 1 or in special videos? Some one please put it in. Thanks! (Ilikerad 17:11, 18 September 2007 (UTC))
- See Red vs. Blue (season 1)#Episode 0. Content about the series is spread out over several articles. — TKD::Talk 21:43, 18 September 2007 (UTC)
Red vs Blue cameos in Halo 3?
I've been told that Geoff Ramsey and Gus Sorola (voices of Grif and Simmons) have a cameo scene in Halo 3. Is this true, and if so would it warrant a brief mention somewhere on this page? Joylock 17:27, 25 September 2007 (UTC)
- Well... a couple of things: (1) we need a source; going by the tone of voices alone would be original research. (2) The probably better belongs in Rooster Teeth Productions, or the individual articles on the voice actors, unless the line is actually a reference to Red vs. Blue itself. — TKD::Talk 17:34, 25 September 2007 (UTC)
- Their 'cameos' are on a bonus disc in the Legendary Edition, where Gus introduces a version of episode 1 filmed in Halo 3. Before doing so, he opens a brief (fake and comedic) history of how the RT guys got into machinima featuring Burnie and Geoff talking about video games and being able to use it for movies at various points of their lives. As far as I'm aware they didn't appear in the game itself. Dac 00:02, 26 September 2007 (UTC)
- They appeared in the game. They are random marines and also part of an easter egg in the Crow's Nest level. Rooster Teeth won an auction at (PAX?) to be guest voice actors for the game itself. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Keyes (talk • contribs) 17:32, 28 September 2007 (UTC)
- Their 'cameos' are on a bonus disc in the Legendary Edition, where Gus introduces a version of episode 1 filmed in Halo 3. Before doing so, he opens a brief (fake and comedic) history of how the RT guys got into machinima featuring Burnie and Geoff talking about video games and being able to use it for movies at various points of their lives. As far as I'm aware they didn't appear in the game itself. Dac 00:02, 26 September 2007 (UTC)
Size
This article seems kinda long. It's bigger than the Wiki piece on the country of Ghana for Chrissakes. 66.57.225.198 06:38, 9 October 2007 (UTC)
- Then again, this article, a featured article, has many more references. I calculate the prose size (that is, excluding references, external links, etc.) at just less than 30 KB and 5,000 words. Per the WP:SIZE guideline, that is by no means inordinately long. Featured articles tend to be longer because of their comprehensiveness and referencing. — TKD::Talk 06:56, 9 October 2007 (UTC)
- Maybe becuase RvB is hugely popular and noone in the world has heard of Ghana? DUH! --Simpsons fan 66 10:45, 9 November 2007 (UTC)
- No, as a nation, Ghana has vastly more importance in real life. However, the whole comparison to Ghana is a red herring. Each article stands on its own merits. — TKD::Talk 16:06, 9 November 2007 (UTC)
Main Page heads-up
Halo: Combat Evolved has been scheduled for November 15 as the featured article for that day. Red vs. Blue is mentioned and linked to from that blurb, so this article might see additional traffic. — TKD::Talk 12:07, 12 November 2007 (UTC)
Spartan III
Has anyone thought that the characters are part of the Spartan III project and that is why they wear the armour? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Gretnablues (talk • contribs) 20:37, 15 November 2007 (UTC)
- No, because that's the Halo universe, not the Red vs Blue universe. Dac 21:49, 15 November 2007 (UTC)
Its the same universe and when you think about it kinda make sence. The Spartan III were made cheeply and quickly and when the war finished the UNSC probably made go against each over.
- Wikipedia featured articles
- Featured articles that have appeared on the main page
- Featured articles that have appeared on the main page once
- Old requests for peer review
- FA-Class Animation articles
- Top-importance Animation articles
- FA-Class Animation articles of Top-importance
- WikiProject Animation articles
- Wikipedia pages referenced by the press