Jump to content

User talk:TSO1D: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Jaakobou (talk | contribs)
quick question: new section
Line 124: Line 124:


mind my asking, but how/where were you notified on the edit conflict in [[Carlos Latuff]]? <b><font face="Arial" color="teal">[[User:Jaakobou|Jaakobou]]</font><font color="1F860E"><sup>''[[User talk:Jaakobou|Chalk Talk]]''</sup></font></b> 15:32, 19 November 2007 (UTC)
mind my asking, but how/where were you notified on the edit conflict in [[Carlos Latuff]]? <b><font face="Arial" color="teal">[[User:Jaakobou|Jaakobou]]</font><font color="1F860E"><sup>''[[User talk:Jaakobou|Chalk Talk]]''</sup></font></b> 15:32, 19 November 2007 (UTC)

==Administrator==

You are an administrator? Why don't you protect the page who reflects the truth? Mulţam'--[[User:Cezarika f.|Cezarika f.]] ([[User talk:Cezarika f.|talk]]) 16:02, 19 November 2007 (UTC)

Revision as of 16:02, 19 November 2007

Archive1 Archive2 Archive3 Archive4 Archive5

Back

So you're back! Welcome. :) --Illythr 09:00, 6 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Allow me to sign my name to this welcome note. Good to see you again. Dahn 15:10, 6 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
I subscribe, too. Dpotop 15:20, 6 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Myself as well. PētersV 17:04, 6 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Welcome back! It's been too long. Biruitorul 00:39, 7 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Bine-ai revenit. În timpul pauzei tale lucrurile s-au liniştit pe plaiurile transnistrene, ca urmare a cazului de arbitrare, care cred că conţine informaţii utile pentru tine.--MariusM 10:58, 11 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks

...we needed that.[1] Raymond Arritt 01:58, 13 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Signpost updated for November 5th and 12th, 2007.

The Wikipedia Signpost
The Wikipedia Signpost
Weekly Delivery



Volume 3, Issue 45 5 November 2007 About the Signpost

Wikimedia avoids liability in French lawsuit WikiWorld comic: "Fall Out Boy"
News and notes: Grant money, fundraiser, milestones WikiProject Report: Lists of basic topics
Features and admins Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
The Report on Lengthy Litigation

Volume 3, Issue 46 12 November 2007 About the Signpost

Unregistered page creation remains on hold so far WikiWorld comic: "Exploding whale"
News and notes: Fundraiser, elections galore, milestones Wikipedia in the News
WikiProject Report: Missing encyclopedic articles Features and admins
Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News The Report on Lengthy Litigation

Home  |  Archives  |  Newsroom  |  Tip Line  |  Single-Page View Shortcut : WP:POST

You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 08:25, 13 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I was away for 1 week. I've noticed today that Anittas was blocked. I suggest to open a RfC.

My relationship with Anittas during the latest period was not good, because he was uncivil (with other people, not with me, but anyway it was under my nose). Although I do understand that he talks 100 times more than he means, it still is a pretty unpleasant talk. I was very harsh towards him during the last time I talked with him. Perhaps too harsh. I was going to reply him with a list of things I hold against him. During my time away I realized that none of those issues taken separately are serious, but there are many of them. Basically, it all rotates around Anittas' predilect method of calling people Muntenian/etc or other ways in a pejorative way. At first I thought it is a problem of education. Then I realized Anittas simply got used to this and does not realize that this makes other people uncomfortable. Anyway. My personal suggestion would be to keep the block for talk pages (where 100% of his uncivil behavior occurred), but let him edit the encyclopedia (as he was not uncivil during edits). The motivation for the block I suggest: "please, stop using WP as a chat space". After some time, he could apply for unblock, but I do not want to speculate when and how. Let me emphasize again: all his past bad record was about his behavior in talk pages and in his own user space. I do not remember him vandalizing encyclopedia pages or doing bad faith edits, on the contrary. So, I suggest the block to be specific to the area where there is a problem. :Dc76\talk 16:54, 16 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for adding yourself to this list. The title of the noticeboard is perhaps one of the worst titles that exist in WP, and I am the author of that monstrosity. Is there a Wiki-project Moldova? Maybe this noticeboard can be redirected/renamed there... We lack many basic things:

  • we don't even have a good idea about what pages exist about Moldova, what pages are needed, there is no invetory
  • we need people interested in creating pages for localities, and I mean pages better than "X is a village in Moldova". Personally, I was interested in creating a list of all localities: by administrative division and by name (alphabetic).
  • other stuff that will emerge as high priority once a good inventory of existing articles is made

In short, thank you for joinging the Sisifian club. :) :Dc76\talk 17:07, 16 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I noticed your work on this article. Although I am sure you are doing this, please do not forget to:

  • move all information that you erase into "sub-articles". If you find the information not enough reliable, add [dubiousdiscuss]. But don't erase technical data, such as number of inhabitants, altogether. It is very hard to bring such numbers again.
  • I do understand the reason for erasing "See also", but then you might want to link those articles inside the text, so that one can find some link to them from Moldova (obviously, Moldovan wine or Moldovan cuisine do not have to link, but foreign relations I think can be and should be).
  • if you need help, let me know. I can, for example, compare two versions, and add info that was eliminated from Moldova to sub-articles, and then we can read those, and clean them in their own turn. Or other help that you find needed. Let's divide the work and have more of it done.
Anyway, thank you very much for your interest in the subject.:Dc76\talk 18:29, 16 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the welcome!

Sotnik (talk) 06:16, 17 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Balti

  • Hello there. I do not see any need to discuss the spelling of Balti in English. Unless you can provide an official source stating that the name of the Balti city is spelled otherwise in English language, it simply cannot be a matter of a debate. As for moving the talk page with all the sensitive issues, I agree with you, especially with those that were stated by me and further deleted by someone (have no time to check who did this). Could you help me please with moving the talk page, as you seem to know how to do this. Otherwise I will do it myself, but it might take more time. Thanks again and have a nice WE. Moldopodo (talk) 08:59, 17 November 2007 (UTC)Moldopodo[reply]
  • Ok, I understood the move function, and have already tried it. But indeed it does not work with Balti, as other pages exist already. Will you make the request to move then? By the way, the same applies to Chisinau and other Moldavian localities. Thnaks in advance if you do at least part of requests. Moldopodo (talk) 16:03, 17 November 2007 (UTC)Moldopodo[reply]

quick question

mind my asking, but how/where were you notified on the edit conflict in Carlos Latuff? JaakobouChalk Talk 15:32, 19 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Administrator

You are an administrator? Why don't you protect the page who reflects the truth? Mulţam'--Cezarika f. (talk) 16:02, 19 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]