Jump to content

Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Wormshill: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
→‎Wormshill: comment
→‎Wormshill: section stubs?
Line 6: Line 6:
:: Data up to 1971 is available [http://www.visionofbritain.org.uk/data_cube_table_page.jsp?data_theme=T_POP&data_cube=N_TPop&u_id=10229327&c_id=10001043&add=N here] (The [http://www.visionofbritain.org.uk/place/place_page.jsp?p_id=6500 Vision of Britain] site would be a useful source in general for the article) [[User:Bluap|Bluap]] ([[User talk:Bluap|talk]]) 03:25, 7 December 2007 (UTC)
:: Data up to 1971 is available [http://www.visionofbritain.org.uk/data_cube_table_page.jsp?data_theme=T_POP&data_cube=N_TPop&u_id=10229327&c_id=10001043&add=N here] (The [http://www.visionofbritain.org.uk/place/place_page.jsp?p_id=6500 Vision of Britain] site would be a useful source in general for the article) [[User:Bluap|Bluap]] ([[User talk:Bluap|talk]]) 03:25, 7 December 2007 (UTC)
::{{done}} Thanks for these, great idea. I'm pretty sure I've plundered Vision of Britain as much as I can for info on the village and was wary of overdoing the demographic stats but the table is a neat way of presenting the data. Thanks [[User:Rjgibb|Dick G]] ([[User talk:Rjgibb|talk]]) 03:49, 7 December 2007 (UTC)
::{{done}} Thanks for these, great idea. I'm pretty sure I've plundered Vision of Britain as much as I can for info on the village and was wary of overdoing the demographic stats but the table is a neat way of presenting the data. Thanks [[User:Rjgibb|Dick G]] ([[User talk:Rjgibb|talk]]) 03:49, 7 December 2007 (UTC)
*'''Comment''': I do realize that as a small village, not much can be done about this, but can the numerous section stubs be somehow merged or expanded? For example, as [[Chew Stoke]] was brought up, when I had [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Chew_Stoke&oldid=49997664 first reviewed it] most of the sections had just a couple of sentences, but now is much better. [[User:AndyZ|AZ]]&nbsp;<sub>[[User talk:AndyZ|t]]</sub> 16:47, 8 December 2007 (UTC)

Revision as of 16:47, 8 December 2007

I'm self-nominating this article for featured article because it has recently made Good Article status and has passed Peer Review without substantial comment. It satisfies WP:CITIES and I have addressed all barriers (I think) to FA and would like to get editors' feedback as to how to get this to the highest possible standards for Wiki. Cheers Dick G (talk) 01:01, 7 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: It would be nice to have census data, as in Chew Stoke (a recently passed Featured Article) Bluap (talk) 03:15, 7 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Data up to 1921 is available in the Victoria County History, and has been placed online here Bluap (talk) 03:19, 7 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Data up to 1971 is available here (The Vision of Britain site would be a useful source in general for the article) Bluap (talk) 03:25, 7 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
 Done Thanks for these, great idea. I'm pretty sure I've plundered Vision of Britain as much as I can for info on the village and was wary of overdoing the demographic stats but the table is a neat way of presenting the data. Thanks Dick G (talk) 03:49, 7 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment: I do realize that as a small village, not much can be done about this, but can the numerous section stubs be somehow merged or expanded? For example, as Chew Stoke was brought up, when I had first reviewed it most of the sections had just a couple of sentences, but now is much better. AZ t 16:47, 8 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]