Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2007 December 12: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
m Signing comment by Kameejl - "Adding User:Emmaneul." |
|||
Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
<noinclude>This is a list of redirects that have been proposed for deletion on December 12, 2007</noinclude> |
<noinclude>This is a list of redirects that have been proposed for deletion on December 12, 2007</noinclude> |
||
<!-- Add new entries directly below this line --> |
<!-- Add new entries directly below this line --> |
||
====[[Quad damage]] → [[Quake (series)]]==== |
|||
overly generic redirect name to a specific usage [[Special:Contributions/132.205.99.122|132.205.99.122]] ([[User talk:132.205.99.122|talk]]) 21:14, 12 December 2007 (UTC) |
|||
====[[Gwladgold]] → [[Gwlad]]==== |
====[[Gwladgold]] → [[Gwlad]]==== |
||
Gwladgold is unrelated to Gwlad – [[User:PeeJay2K3|Pee]][[User talk:PeeJay2K3|Jay]] 09:17, 12 December 2007 (UTC) |
Gwladgold is unrelated to Gwlad – [[User:PeeJay2K3|Pee]][[User talk:PeeJay2K3|Jay]] 09:17, 12 December 2007 (UTC) |
Revision as of 21:14, 12 December 2007
December 12
This is a list of redirects that have been proposed for deletion on December 12, 2007
Quad damage → Quake (series)
overly generic redirect name to a specific usage 132.205.99.122 (talk) 21:14, 12 December 2007 (UTC)
Gwladgold → Gwlad
Gwladgold is unrelated to Gwlad – PeeJay 09:17, 12 December 2007 (UTC)
- Comment and Delete Personally I feel this falls under csd-r3 "It is a recently-created redirect page resulting from an implausible typo (CSD R3).". Although not created as a redirect, that is essentially what it became as it simply recreated the entire content of Gwlad. Since being changed to a redirect, it should just be killed quickly.Nouse4aname (talk) 13:40, 12 December 2007 (UTC)
- You say that it's unrelated. I can't find any evidence that this particular title exists at all outside the Wikipedia pagehistory. But I also can't find anything else that this would apply to. If it exists, the redirect would seem appropriate. Either way, the page definitely does not apply for speedy-deletion under R3. You can say many things about this as a fork or other action but I don't see any way to credibly call this a typo, implausible or otherwise. Rossami (talk) 16:40, 12 December 2007 (UTC)
User:Emmaneul → User:Kameejl
Delete for privacy reasons —Preceding unsigned comment added by Kameejl (talk • contribs) 18:50, 12 December 2007 (UTC)