User talk:KnowledgeOfSelf: Difference between revisions
m Reverted edits by Darth Anzeruthi (talk) to last version by Xn4 |
No edit summary |
||
Line 135: | Line 135: | ||
==User talk:Xn4== |
==User talk:Xn4== |
||
Many thanks! [[User:Xn4|<span style="color:#9911DD">Xn4</span>]] 04:22, 14 December 2007 (UTC) |
Many thanks! [[User:Xn4|<span style="color:#9911DD">Xn4</span>]] 04:22, 14 December 2007 (UTC) |
||
== This is your last warning == |
|||
IM WARNING U RESPOND TO MY EARLIER COMMENT |
Revision as of 04:30, 14 December 2007
*This talk page is archived every 50 topics, if it gets too long or stagnant, or whenever I feel like it. :)
*Also if you leave me a message I will reply on this page, if I leave you a message, you can reply at either talk page I'll keep watch on both.
User:76.126.4.212Greetings. I was cleaning out some CAT:TEMP pages and came across User talk:76.126.4.212, that you'd indefblocked. I've been told that, normally, we don't indefblock IPs as such. The reasoning is that if the user changes ISP and the blocked IP were eventually assigned to a new computer, it would in turn be indefblocked. Would you consider unblocking and reblocking them say, for 6 months or perhaps a year? Thanks for your consideration, --Bradeos Graphon (talk) 22:32, 12 December 2007 (UTC)
User:125.255.1.104Hi, can you re-block this user. It appears he has been unblocked, and he has vandalised again. Tumble-Weed —Preceding comment was added at 02:36, 13 December 2007 (UTC)
EagerIf you saw that game, those edits are completely justified. HelpWould you help me create an image of Duy Tân. Thanks. 96.229.179.106 (talk) 05:09, 13 December 2007 (UTC)
UntitledI'm sorry, don't block me. It was a mistake -- —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.176.64.12 (talk) 09:07, 13 December 2007 (UTC) Vandalism questionHello. I don't understand why 212.117.106.97 (talk · contribs) is "not a vandal". It is a school's IP Address. Simply because its a school's IP Address does that mean it can continue to be abused? Thanks for the help. -- AJ24 (talk) 10:00, 13 December 2007 (UTC)
Image:Kirk_Hinrich_Banner.jpg listed for deletionAn image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Kirk_Hinrich_Banner.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Yonatan talk 15:58, 13 December 2007 (UTC)
Stop Deleting my ArticlesI just signed up last night and I kep trying to create an article last night called Eccentric Fatlity. It had a pic and a small article written into it. It was getting late so I stopped, and when I woke up this morning to resume editing, my article was gone, so I ask you this nicely, please stop deleting my article about Eccentric Fatalty unde the same title name. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Natron bomb (talk • contribs) Deleted Emmett H. Walker, Jr. articleHi I see you speedily deleted my article on Lieut. Gen Emmett H. Walker, Jr. as a 'Biographical article that doesn't assert the significance of its subject'. This is an obvious mistake. The article does point out prominently that he was at one time the Chief of the National Guard of the United States - which is a major military command in the US. Furthermore he was a World War II hero winning both the Silver and Bronze stars!!. I would also point out that other former chiefs of the National Guard have pages up eg. John B. Conway, Raymond F. Rees and Russell C. Davis. As such I urge you to reinstate the article. Kiwipat (talk) 20:06, 13 December 2007 (UTC)
RequestMy bad, I had to change so many links to point to the new image (on another project) that I forgot to do so here. Yonatan talk 20:57, 13 December 2007 (UTC) Mark753Here's another IP sock he's using - Special:Contributions/142.162.161.238. Funeral 23:43, 13 December 2007 (UTC)
Buffalo Wings and RingsWhat have I done wrong? You have sent me a first and final warning that I do not understand. Thanks.Buffalo Wings and Rings
God Fires Man wiki pageCould you not delete the music page for the band God Fires Man please. The page I created complies with the criteria for bands and musicians. They have had notable coverage in UK press. They have toured the UK with Hundred Reasons and will go on extensive touring of Europe and USA in 2008. They contain 2 band members whose previous bands have been signed to a major recroding label (Geffen Records), and 3 former bands who have undertaken extensive global touring over the past decade. The producer of their forth coming album has produced major label albums by Cave In, and the mixer has mixed albums for Deftones and Audioslave in the past. Their lead single from latest EP "Dark" is getting notable radio plays on Radio 1 and XFM in the UK. Publishing of this page would be much appreciated as it will myself the time of redoing it. Thanks —Preceding unsigned comment added by Bornalion (talk • contribs) 23:52, 13 December 2007 (UTC)
oksorry I wil now stop-100 more years of wikipedia! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 172.142.236.124 (talk) 00:13, 14 December 2007 (UTC) Buffalo Wings and Rings CTDThe page describes the company in a fair way. Many companies are described in the same manner. Can you tell me what is advertising in your mind and should be removed to be compliant. Is there a special page of the dos and donts. I have tried to read all policies related to advertising and could find one that I have violated. Thanks.Buffalo Wings and Rings —Preceding comment was added at 01:55, 14 December 2007 (UTC)
User talk:Xn4Many thanks! Xn4 04:22, 14 December 2007 (UTC)
This is your last warningIM WARNING U RESPOND TO MY EARLIER COMMENT |