Talk:Universal language: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 18:28, 23 December 2007

Constructed languages B‑class High‑importance

	Constructed languages portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Constructed languages, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of constructed languages on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Constructed languagesWikipedia:WikiProject Constructed languagesTemplate:WikiProject Constructed languagesconstructed language articles
B	This article has been rated as B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Overly focusing on religion?

The introduction and a good deal of the content of this article refers to the religious idea of a universal language - when it seems this should lean more towards contemporary debate between cultures and its use in fiction, etc. --Joewithajay 21:54, 10 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Interlingua propaganda?

I think the paragraph about Interlingua is not written from a NPOV. A simple link to Interlingua article would be sufficient. --FlorentGaret 19:26, 19 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Does it seem to anyone else that this article avoids the fact that English is already becomming THE universal global language? It's the most taught second language, and is the main language in international politics, communications, science, sport and business.--72.139.35.107 (talk) 18:28, 23 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Needs Contemporary Focus?

I agree with the assertion that the article focuses too much on the religious connotations of universal language. This should probably be added to the article on Adamic language instead of this article, which should be about the modern concept.

Esparanza? Atificial contemporary 'universal' languages should probably be included here.

Best universal language is of course Proto-Indo-European, because it once was Adamic language: [1] Wikinger 17:05, 30 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

@@ Line 8: / Line 8: @@
 I think the paragraph about Interlingua is not written from a NPOV. A simple link to Interlingua article would be sufficient. --[[User:FlorentGaret|FlorentGaret]] 19:26, 19 March 2007 (UTC)
+Does it seem to anyone else that this article avoids the fact that English is already becomming THE universal global language? It's the most taught second language, and is the main language in international politics, communications, science, sport and business.--[[Special:Contributions/72.139.35.107|72.139.35.107]] ([[User talk:72.139.35.107|talk]]) 18:28, 23 December 2007 (UTC)
 == Needs Contemporary Focus? ==