Talk:Secret Invasion

Reading Order

We need a reading order for this. As far as I know, the first two issues are Illuminati 05 and A: The Initiative Annual 01 (in that order). Dracoster (talk) 09:43, 6 January 2008 (UTC)

Well, its New Avengers: Illuminati, but the first issue that deals with it is New Avengers #31 p. 20, when they find the first Skrull. But I am sure marvel will release one, if they have not already. Rau J16 22:13, 6 January 2008 (UTC)

Black Bolt

I don't have time to overhaul a page now that the story has officially "started" with Illuminati #5, but in case any of you didn't see it, Black Bolt has been revealed to be a skrull. SoulReaverDan 21:58, 7 November 2007 (UTC)

Thanks S><T for brains. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 124.197.12.118 (talk) 02:13, 8 November 2007 (UTC)

Nightcrawler and Thor

Do we know for a fact that the ones in other comic books are Skrulls? Cause I highly doubt Thor is. The Placebo Effect 05:55, 8 November 2007 (UTC)

Well, after looking at the panel again, I can see how the assumption could be made about the two Skrulls' identities. The one on the left appears to have Thor's shirt and hammer, while the one on the right wears a costume similar to Nightcrawler's and looks to have a tail as well. Not exactly red-handed, but significant nonetheless. At the very least, if one were to rank the Marvel Universe characters based on probability of being a Skrull, Nightcrawler and Thor would have to be the first two on the list. Of course, it's a huge list, because literally everyone is on it. Bagman19 06:23, 8 November 2007 (UTC)

UPDATE: I just noticed Colossus and Cyclops are on this page as being outed. What panel are you referencing? I only saw the two reinforcements. Bagman19 17:19, 8 November 2007 (UTC)

It's not really saying they are outed, but that their powers were seen. SoulReaverDan 04:05, 9 November 2007 (UTC)

Whaddya know? I looked a seventh time, sure enough, eye blasts and chrome arms. Is there an X-Man NOT cloned by the Skrulls? Bagman19 05:31, 9 November 2007 (UTC)

Sry to burst your all discussion about this, but this is supposed to be about how to fix the article, honestly I don't care but, sooner or later someone else who is more of a Rule-Nai is going to be like "OMG STOP!!", anyway if you want to discuss more about this, the Marvel.com boards have a discussion going on all about this, so please stop by there.Phoenix₇₄₁(Talk Page) 13:34, 9 November 2007 (UTC)

Irving Griffin

This article lists this character as being a skrull, based off the Marvel Holiday Special 2007. My question, to consider: is this canon? To my knowledge, the Holiday Specials are one shot issues that do not tie in to any other stories (i.e. they are non-canonical), and hence, would not tie into the Secret Invasion. Also, I'm not actually sure this character existed prior to this issue, nor if he will ever be seen again. Depending on the context in which this character is revealed as a skrull (and I have not seen the 2007 Holiday Special yet, so I do not know the true context myself) I would consider removing this character from the list of "Known Imposters" since he does not appear to be a character that actually exists within Marvel canon. 64.203.163.246 (talk) 05:58, 27 December 2007 (UTC)

i have put in a non-canon part to the reveals section, it includes the above character and Sally Floyd's "reveal" in World War Hulk: Front Line #5 (10 Reasons to Hate Sally Floyd) --- Paulley (talk)

That still does not make any sense. New Avengers is just going into it's 40's. Secret invasion will probaly finished when it gets to #53. I think it should be deleted as should Irving Griffen because they HAVE NOTHING TO DO WITH SECRET INVASION. Thelaststand3 17:17 7 January 2008 (UTC)