Jump to content

Talk:Job Charnock: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
No edit summary
Pre1mjr (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:

Article contains a lot of opinion, and not a lot of fact.[[User:156.34.34.217|156.34.34.217]] <small>—Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|comment]] was added at 13:06, 31 October 2007 (UTC)</small><!--Template:Undated--> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
Article contains a lot of opinion, and not a lot of fact.[[User:156.34.34.217|156.34.34.217]] <small>—Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|comment]] was added at 13:06, 31 October 2007 (UTC)</small><!--Template:Undated--> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->


Line 11: Line 10:


: This article seems badly biased, without many actual facts. Can someone clean this article up, making it less opinion and more facts? --[[User:Pompadours chinabox|Pompadours chinabox]] ([[User talk:Pompadours chinabox|talk]]) 18:34, 23 November 2007 (UTC)
: This article seems badly biased, without many actual facts. Can someone clean this article up, making it less opinion and more facts? --[[User:Pompadours chinabox|Pompadours chinabox]] ([[User talk:Pompadours chinabox|talk]]) 18:34, 23 November 2007 (UTC)


: I've changed the tone and tidied up the page a bit. Unable to add more facts though.[[User:Pre1mjr|Pre1mjr]] ([[User talk:Pre1mjr|talk]]) 14:33, 10 January 2008 (UTC)

Revision as of 14:33, 10 January 2008

Article contains a lot of opinion, and not a lot of fact.156.34.34.217 —Preceding comment was added at 13:06, 31 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Template:1911 talk

WikiProject iconBiography Unassessed
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.
???This article has not yet received a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
This article seems badly biased, without many actual facts. Can someone clean this article up, making it less opinion and more facts? --Pompadours chinabox (talk) 18:34, 23 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]


I've changed the tone and tidied up the page a bit. Unable to add more facts though.Pre1mjr (talk) 14:33, 10 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]