Talk:Messenger bag: Difference between revisions
Appearance
Content deleted Content added
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
:::They are two rather different things. [[User:Mathmo|Mathmo]] <sup>[[User talk:Mathmo|Talk]]</sup> 14:56, 27 April 2007 (UTC) |
:::They are two rather different things. [[User:Mathmo|Mathmo]] <sup>[[User talk:Mathmo|Talk]]</sup> 14:56, 27 April 2007 (UTC) |
||
::::What about [Satchel (bag)]? What's the difference, exactly? -[[User:RoSeeker|RoSeeker]] 09:15, 31 July 2007 (UTC) |
::::What about [Satchel (bag)]? What's the difference, exactly? -[[User:RoSeeker|RoSeeker]] 09:15, 31 July 2007 (UTC) |
||
==Messenger Bag Vs Satchel== |
|||
What is the difference between a Messenger bag and a satchel. This should be included in the article. |
|||
== external links == |
== external links == |
Revision as of 04:39, 17 January 2008
Fashion Start‑class Low‑importance | ||||||||||
|
Mythmon 22:34, 26 April 2006 (UTC)
- Why does this article link to Diplomatic bag?
- Should it not? Ewlyahoocom 01:32, 27 April 2006 (UTC)
- They are two rather different things. Mathmo Talk 14:56, 27 April 2007 (UTC)
- What about [Satchel (bag)]? What's the difference, exactly? -RoSeeker 09:15, 31 July 2007 (UTC)
- They are two rather different things. Mathmo Talk 14:56, 27 April 2007 (UTC)
- Should it not? Ewlyahoocom 01:32, 27 April 2006 (UTC)
Messenger Bag Vs Satchel
What is the difference between a Messenger bag and a satchel. This should be included in the article.
external links
Why were the external links for the bag reviews and the brand list removed? Completly un-necessary. I would say that those are helpful links and are not link spam. the bag reviews page is quite helpful and informative. As long as that content is not included in the article (which would make it NPOV) I see no reason not to have it in the article. The list of companies should be listed too. I will reinsert the reviews page but won't put in the company list yet. --Tainter 18:28, 23 April 2007 (UTC)--150.131.70.240 18:27, 23 April 2007 (UTC)
- I agree, as an ex-courier my view is it should be there. It adds to the article as a whole. Mathmo Talk 14:54, 27 April 2007 (UTC)