User talk:Rockk3r

Duplicate images uploaded

Thanks for uploading Image:La Quinta Esencia cover back.jpg. A machine-controlled robot account noticed that you also uploaded the same image under the name Image:La Quinta Esencia back.jpg. The copy called Image:La Quinta Esencia back.jpg has been marked for speedy deletion since it is redundant. If this sounds okay to you, there is no need for you to take any action.

This is an automated message- you have not upset or annoyed anyone, and you do not need to respond. In the future, you may save yourself some confusion if you supply a meaningful file name and refer to 'my contributions' to remind yourself exactly which name you chose (file names are case sensitive, including the extension) so that you won't lose track of your uploads. For tips on good file naming, see Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions about this notice, or feel that the deletion is inappropriate, please contact User:Staecker, who operates the robot account. Staeckerbot (talk) 02:30, 7 January 2008 (UTC)

Pablo García

Hi. There are numerous people with this name, none more notable than the other, so please leave the disambiguation page where it is. SteveO (talk) 21:18, 10 January 2008 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (Image:El Sello De Los Tiempos.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:El Sello De Los Tiempos.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 06:16, 15 January 2008 (UTC)

El Sello De Los Tiempos album cover

I was wondering why you keep removing the album cover from the El Sello De Los Tiempos article and replacing it with one that doesn't meet the fair use rationale (image size)?  Esradekan Gibb  ^"Talk" 10:47, 17 January 2008 (UTC)

Edit summaries

Hello. Please don't forget to provide an edit summary. Thank you.

I notice you virtually never include edit summaries with your changes. It is recommended practice and in my experience not doing so makes it more likely another editor will revert changes so I encourage you to do it. Ros0709 (talk) 11:05, 20 January 2008 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:Jaus Records.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Jaus Records.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 02:43, 21 January 2008 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of RafaBasa

A tag has been placed on RafaBasa requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for web content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. - Realkyhick (Talk to me) 23:25, 21 January 2008 (UTC)

It is a non-notable web site. It greatly fails to meet the criteria in WP:WEB. To call this site "important" is exaggeration in the extreme. Kerrang! is a printed magazine with notability recognized by multiple sources. RafaBasa does not compare; even if it did, the fact that a similar article exists is not a valid argument for keeping an article. All articles stand or fall on their individual merits. - Realkyhick (Talk to me) 23:44, 21 January 2008 (UTC)

I did not delete the article. I am not an admin, so I can't delete articles by myself. I merely marked the article for speedy-deletion. An admin then checks the article; if he or she agrees, the article is deleted, or it stays if the admin disagrees. The admin also cnsiders any hangon tags applied, but mat elect to delete anyway of he or she feels than hangon reason is insufficient.

It appears that you are using Wikipedia for promotional purposes. This is not allowed. - Realkyhick (Talk to me) 23:53, 21 January 2008 (UTC)

Please stop. If you continue to add promotional material to Wikipedia, you will be blocked from editing. IrishGuy ^talk 23:45, 21 January 2008 (UTC)

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
The next time you use Wikipedia for advertising, you will be blocked from editing. IrishGuy ^talk 01:20, 22 January 2008 (UTC)

This means, "We're tired of your bull****". If you try to promote this site IN ANY FORM WHATSOEVER, you will be blocked, perhaps indefinitely. Stop it, now! - Realkyhick (Talk to me) 03:25, 22 January 2008 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Rammstein logo.png)

Thanks for uploading Image:Rammstein logo.png. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 10:01, 22 January 2008 (UTC)

Notability of Skizoo

A tag has been placed on Skizoo requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article appears to be about a real person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable. If this is the first page that you have created, then you should read the guide to writing your first article.

If you think that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Corvus cornix_talk 06:27, 27 January 2008 (UTC)

Welcome to Wikipedia. Please do not remove speedy deletion tags from pages that you have created yourself, as you did with Skizoo. If you do not believe the page should be deleted, then please place {{hangon}} on the page (please do not remove any existing speedy deletion tag) and make your case on the page's talk page. Administrators will look at your reasoning before deciding what to do with the page. Thank you. Corvus cornix_talk 06:44, 27 January 2008 (UTC)

I'm not an admin and I didn't delete anything. It was deleted by Pegasus. I had already decided that, despite no real claims of notability, I was going to sidestep out of the discussion. Corvus cornix_talk 21:14, 27 January 2008 (UTC)

I don't know Pegasus personally, but since he/she deleted the article, they must be an admin, because only admins can delete articles. You ought to discuss this with them at User:Pegasus's Talk page. Corvus cornix_talk 21:30, 27 January 2008 (UTC)

Logos and flags

Read the Template:Infobox musical artist guidelines and discussions. No Logos in the infobox. Also read WP:MOSFLAG. No flags in infoboxes. These 2 rules have been quoted in previous edit summaries. Please read them. 156.34.217.154 (talk) 02:29, 31 January 2008 (UTC)