User talk:Musachachado: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 18:44, 16 July 2005

Welcome! (We can't say that loud/big enough!)

Here are a few links you might find helpful:

You can sign your name on talk pages and votes by typing ~~~~; our software automatically converts it to your username and the date.

If you have any questions or problems, no matter what they are, leave me a message on my talk page.

We're so glad you're here! -- Essjay · Talk 05:17, July 14, 2005 (UTC)

Ainu people

Which parts do you think are plagiarized, and from what source?--Pharos 18:32, 16 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]

compare this to the 1911 article on the ainu people in the encyclopedia britannica. it's almost word for word.

The 1911 Encyclopædia Britannica has passed into the public domain; anyone can use its words for any purpose.--Pharos 18:40, 16 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Encyclopedia articles dont pass into public domain since they are amended each year with just minor changes. Therefore, they are essentially 'living' documents and can only pass into public domain if they are SUBSTANTIALLY different from current incarnations of the article, which this is is not. Furthermore, it is in rather bad taste to not credit article to its rightful owner at all, even if it were public domain, which it is assuredly not.Musachachado 18:44, 16 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Revision as of 18:40, 16 July 2005 edit Pharos (talk \| contribs) Administrators 57,492 edits →[[Ainu people]]: its in the public doman ← Previous edit		Revision as of 18:44, 16 July 2005 edit undo Musachachado (talk \| contribs) 36 edits →[[Ainu people]] Next edit →
Line 26:		Line 26:

	The [[1911 Encyclopædia Britannica]] has passed into the [[public domain]]; anyone can use its words for any purpose.--[[User:Pharos\|Pharos]] 18:40, 16 July 2005 (UTC)		The [[1911 Encyclopædia Britannica]] has passed into the [[public domain]]; anyone can use its words for any purpose.--[[User:Pharos\|Pharos]] 18:40, 16 July 2005 (UTC)

			Encyclopedia articles dont pass into public domain since they are amended each year with just minor changes. Therefore, they are essentially 'living' documents and can only pass into public domain if they are SUBSTANTIALLY different from current incarnations of the article, which this is is not. Furthermore, it is in rather bad taste to not credit article to its rightful owner at all, even if it were public domain, which it is assuredly not.[[User:Musachachado\|Musachachado]] 18:44, 16 July 2005 (UTC)