Jump to content

Talk:Planck energy: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Line 10: Line 10:


Better yet, don't say it at all, because it's wrong and irrelevant. --[[User:75.58.54.17|75.58.54.17]] 06:53, 28 October 2007 (UTC)
Better yet, don't say it at all, because it's wrong and irrelevant. --[[User:75.58.54.17|75.58.54.17]] 06:53, 28 October 2007 (UTC)

:I agree wholeheartedly, and would like to subscribe to your newsletter and/or mailing list. --[[Special:Contributions/76.217.94.0|76.217.94.0]] ([[User talk:76.217.94.0|talk]]) 22:34, 11 February 2008 (UTC)

Revision as of 22:34, 11 February 2008

WikiProject iconPhysics Redirect‑class
WikiProject iconThis redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Physics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Physics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
RedirectThis redirect does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.

Weasel words, and meaningless factoid.

The Planck energy equals approximately the electricity consumed by an average person in a developed country in two weeks (2001 figures for US citizens).

When you say "electricity" what exactly are you referring to? It's generally understood to mean electric current. How do you convert energy (joules) into current (coulombs per second) to make this a meaningful comparison?

If you mean energy, then fucking say energy. "Electricity" is a meaningless word, and has no place in a science article.

Better yet, don't say it at all, because it's wrong and irrelevant. --75.58.54.17 06:53, 28 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I agree wholeheartedly, and would like to subscribe to your newsletter and/or mailing list. --76.217.94.0 (talk) 22:34, 11 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]