Jump to content

User talk:TheCatalyst31: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Line 40: Line 40:
Thanks,
Thanks,
[[Special:Contributions/68.197.45.186|68.197.45.186]] ([[User talk:68.197.45.186|talk]]) 22:10, 21 February 2008 (UTC)
[[Special:Contributions/68.197.45.186|68.197.45.186]] ([[User talk:68.197.45.186|talk]]) 22:10, 21 February 2008 (UTC)

:Actually, if you look I reverted that string of letters that someone put there - and then you reverted it and put them back. You should check stuff before you revert - not try and rack up reverts just to get a barnstar.

Thanks, [[Special:Contributions/68.197.45.186|68.197.45.186]] ([[User talk:68.197.45.186|talk]]) 22:24, 21 February 2008 (UTC)

Revision as of 22:24, 21 February 2008

Welcome!

Hi TheCatalyst31! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Happy editing! Zagalejo 02:15, 13 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for reverting the vandalism on 'N Sync! :-) Cbrown1023 talk 19:36, 9 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Charter Arms Bulldog GA Review

An article you worked on, Charter Arms Bulldog, has been submitted for Good Article Review and placed on hold pending one or more changes. Comments have been left on the talk page of the article including suggested improvements. Please send me a message when or if improvements have been made, and I'll take another look at the article. Good luck in the review process! JKBrooks85 20:47, 23 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

AIV

Thank you for making a report about 24.189.188.34 (talk · contribs · block log) on Wikipedia:Administrator intervention against vandalism. Reporting and removing vandalism is vital to the functioning of Wikipedia and all users are encouraged to revert, warn, and report vandalism. However, administrators are generally only able to block users if they have received a recent final warning (one that mentions that the user may be blocked) and they have recently vandalized after that warning was given. The reported user has not yet been blocked because it appears this has not occurred yet. If this user continues to vandalize even after their final warning, please report them to the AIV noticeboard again. Thank you! TigerShark 00:59, 2 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Green Bay Packers WikiProject!

Template:InvitePackersProject
Gonzo fan2007 talkcontribs 00:58, 11 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Vandalism warnings

Hi. I see that you recently gave a vandalism warning to Madzach1095. You used the third warning in a series of four warnings. If someone does vandalize a page, please use only the first warning if it is their first offense, and advance after each subsequent vandalism edit by that user. I suggest that you read this page, which gives information and examples of how to adequately warn users for vandalism and how the four-warning idea works. If you report a user at Wikipedia:Administrator intervention against vandalism, chances are the vandal won't get blocked unless they've been sufficiently warned. If you have any questions, please ask on my talk page. Timmehcontribs 03:42, 6 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

You left a message on my talk page about the above article. When am I supposed to have made the edits you refer to? -Rrius (talk) 01:58, 18 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, Something is wrong with the revision history. The only change I made was the "split-off" language. I would never have reverted the area code box and I rarely touch categories. I don't love the lists, but all I have ever done with those that I can remember is to pare down the one under 815. I don't know how this stuff happens, but I have seen people refer to situations like this on Talk pages before. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Rrius (talkcontribs) 02:12, 18 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

HOW DO I GET TO EDIT

Hoiw do i edit locked pages, ie., how do i gget clearance.../ Thanks23:38, 12 February 2008 (UTC)

Why did you revert my edit??

Hi,

You reverted an edit that I made on the article "Continental Drift" here it is:

http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Continental_drift&action=history

18:45, 18 February 2008 TheCatalyst31 (Talk | contribs) m (13,837 bytes) (Reverted edits by 68.197.45.186 (talk) to last version by Geologyguy)

Why did you do this? Were you not paying attention to what I reverted?

Thanks, 68.197.45.186 (talk) 22:10, 21 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Actually, if you look I reverted that string of letters that someone put there - and then you reverted it and put them back. You should check stuff before you revert - not try and rack up reverts just to get a barnstar.

Thanks, 68.197.45.186 (talk) 22:24, 21 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]