Jump to content

User talk:Party: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Blocked: new section
Party (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Line 51: Line 51:


Per CheckUser evidence, I've blocked this account as a [[WP:SOCK|sock puppet]] of {{Userlinks|EpicFlame}}. [[User:Ryan Postlethwaite|'''<font color="#000088">Ry<font color="#220066">an<font color="#550044"> P<font color="#770022">os<font color="#aa0000">tl</font>et</font>hw</font>ai</font>te</font>''']] 00:09, 24 February 2008 (UTC)
Per CheckUser evidence, I've blocked this account as a [[WP:SOCK|sock puppet]] of {{Userlinks|EpicFlame}}. [[User:Ryan Postlethwaite|'''<font color="#000088">Ry<font color="#220066">an<font color="#550044"> P<font color="#770022">os<font color="#aa0000">tl</font>et</font>hw</font>ai</font>te</font>''']] 00:09, 24 February 2008 (UTC)

{{unblock|Excuse me? Sock puppet accusations? I deny those accusations! I reject these accusations. I wonder if it's possible to appeal this issue to a meditation comitee.}}

Revision as of 04:59, 24 February 2008

This user is watching you trough the Internet Tubes! O_O

I guess so. If you see a user with less than 500 edits that does not explain a reason for wanting AWB, I don't see a problem with removing them.   jj137 (talk) 03:52, 20 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

RE: Barnstar

Say, thanks! It has been added to my shelf of shiny things. :) GlassCobra 05:13, 20 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks from me too, much appreciated :-) All the best! CounterFX (talk) 10:49, 20 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you for the barnstar Party. Compwhiz II(Talk)(Contribs) 11:28, 20 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Par-tey! thank you. --123Pie (talk) 16:53, 21 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks as well. It's only my 3rd barnstar. Stifle (talk) 09:41, 22 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

AWB for user:wolfram1

see User_talk:Wolfram1#WP:AWB --Wolfram1 (talk) 18:43, 21 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Re: WP:AWB

Thanks for looking over my application. Nicholas Perkins (TC) 21:42, 21 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Re:AWB question

It can be used on any wiki.   jj137 (talk) 03:43, 23 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

My immediate reaction was that since he has less than 500 edits here he should be declined, but I later went back and approved him because he has well over 1000 on de:. The English wikipedia is the only place you can be approved for AWB, so sometimes users from other languages (with over 500 edits there) will request approval here, and they should be approved.   jj137 (talk) 04:30, 23 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

You're welcome

It's my pleasure. And thank you so much for the barnstar! Have a great weekend, JNW (talk) 19:10, 23 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

No problem. - Rjd0060 (talk) 19:14, 23 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Ditto per above--Antonio Lopez (talk) 19:22, 23 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked

Per CheckUser evidence, I've blocked this account as a sock puppet of EpicFlame (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log). Ryan Postlethwaite 00:09, 24 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This user is asking that their block be reviewed:

Party (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

Excuse me? Sock puppet accusations? I deny those accusations! I reject these accusations. I wonder if it's possible to appeal this issue to a meditation comitee.

Notes:

  • In some cases, you may not in fact be blocked, or your block has already expired. Please check the list of active blocks. If no block is listed, then you have been autoblocked by the automated anti-vandalism systems. Please remove this request and follow these instructions instead for quick attention by an administrator.
  • Please read our guide to appealing blocks to make sure that your unblock request will help your case. You may change your request at any time.
Administrator use only:

If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, replace this template with the following, replacing "blocking administrator" with the name of the blocking admin:

{{Unblock on hold |1=blocking administrator |2=Excuse me? Sock puppet accusations? I deny those accusations! I reject these accusations. I wonder if it's possible to appeal this issue to a meditation comitee. |3 = ~~~~}}

If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following code, substituting {{subst:Decline reason here}} with a specific rationale. Leaving the decline reason unchanged will result in display of a default reason, explaining why the request was declined.

{{unblock reviewed |1=Excuse me? Sock puppet accusations? I deny those accusations! I reject these accusations. I wonder if it's possible to appeal this issue to a meditation comitee. |decline = {{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}

If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting Accept reason here with your rationale:

{{unblock reviewed |1=Excuse me? Sock puppet accusations? I deny those accusations! I reject these accusations. I wonder if it's possible to appeal this issue to a meditation comitee. |accept = accept reason here ~~~~}}