User talk:Ale jrb: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
Line 112: | Line 112: | ||
== check your algorithm == |
== check your algorithm == |
||
you did an auto revert on the laborers page on two edits that could not be more relevant. There is no way a human made this error, not sure what to change in your code but laborer and personal safety equipment and high visibility clothing should check out ok.[[Special:Contributions/128.12.170.11|128.12.170.11]] ([[User talk:128.12.170.11|talk]]) 19:44, 27 February 2008 (UTC) |
you did an auto revert on the laborers page on two edits that could not be more relevant. There is no way a human made this error, not sure what to change in your code but laborer and personal safety equipment and high visibility clothing should check out ok.[[Special:Contributions/128.12.170.11|128.12.170.11]] ([[User talk:128.12.170.11|talk]]) 19:44, 27 February 2008 (UTC) |
||
clever, return false if no login && no edit comment. The assumption is if the edit is relevant the revert will be explained and redone. Seems like good assumptions. Creating an array with associated word lists would make the code very complex and still error prone. Probably a good catch of my edits since I was using the backbutton to make corrections to me edits thinking they would post under the first posting, sometimes it seems to work and redundant comments not needed for very minor changes, e.g. caps causing link break[[Special:Contributions/128.12.170.11|128.12.170.11]] ([[User talk:128.12.170.11|talk]]) 19:51, 27 February 2008 (UTC) |
Revision as of 19:51, 27 February 2008
| ||
| ||
|
Talk Controls | ||||||
Welcome to the talk page for Alex Barley - User:Ale_jrb. Before posting a message here, please consider the following:
To leave me a message, click here. I will usually respond to comments made on my page, on my page; this helps to keep conversations together. If you need a response, I strongly suggest that you watch this page. |
|
Messages | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Signpost updated for February 18th and 25th, 2008.
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot (talk) 09:11, 27 February 2008 (UTC) The RickK Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
check your algorithmyou did an auto revert on the laborers page on two edits that could not be more relevant. There is no way a human made this error, not sure what to change in your code but laborer and personal safety equipment and high visibility clothing should check out ok.128.12.170.11 (talk) 19:44, 27 February 2008 (UTC) clever, return false if no login && no edit comment. The assumption is if the edit is relevant the revert will be explained and redone. Seems like good assumptions. Creating an array with associated word lists would make the code very complex and still error prone. Probably a good catch of my edits since I was using the backbutton to make corrections to me edits thinking they would post under the first posting, sometimes it seems to work and redundant comments not needed for very minor changes, e.g. caps causing link break128.12.170.11 (talk) 19:51, 27 February 2008 (UTC) |