Talk:Ecotoxicology: Difference between revisions
Appearance
Content deleted Content added
WhatamIdoing (talk | contribs) m updated wikiproject WPMED «Start/Low» |
No edit summary |
||
Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
Is that really the source one should look at, to understand the concept of "balance of nature"? Seems that concept would have wider currency. By the way, what is the literature reference? |
Is that really the source one should look at, to understand the concept of "balance of nature"? Seems that concept would have wider currency. By the way, what is the literature reference? |
||
---- |
|||
I edited the article and I put in what I thought to be the most relevant information. I will try and lay it out a bit better. I agree with your criticism. |
Revision as of 01:24, 1 March 2008
Please add
{{WikiProject banner shell}}
to this page and add the quality rating to that template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.![]() | Medicine Start‑class Low‑importance | |||||||||
|
Please add
{{WikiProject banner shell}}
to this page and add the quality rating to that template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.![]() | Environment Start‑class | |||||||||
|
Please add
{{WikiProject banner shell}}
to this page and add the quality rating to that template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.![]() | Ecology Start‑class | |||||||||
|
Please Edit this Big-Time
I think this should be looked at by a professional editor. It needs better word choice, needs to be more concise, among other things.
Is that really the source one should look at, to understand the concept of "balance of nature"? Seems that concept would have wider currency. By the way, what is the literature reference?
I edited the article and I put in what I thought to be the most relevant information. I will try and lay it out a bit better. I agree with your criticism.