Talk:Skip Bayless: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 05:01, 2 March 2008

Oklahoma Unassessed

	Oklahoma portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Oklahoma, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of Oklahoma on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.OklahomaWikipedia:WikiProject OklahomaTemplate:WikiProject OklahomaOklahoma articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Biography Unassessed

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.

Page 2

Skip "I'm a tool" Bayless isnt listed on page 2 as a writer anymore. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 128.174.29.155 (talk) 17:53, 21 February 2007 (UTC).[reply]

Another thing, the beginning of the article is inappropriate and wrong. Skip Bayless obviously wasn't born Terrel Owens Bayless and his nickname "Skip 'I'm a total douche bag" Bayless" needs to go.

The page should be locked, a lot of people are adding things like the above.

Relax, Skip ... Wikipedia has editors.

Request for redo.

Some parts of this "biography" are opinions and not actual fact. I request a redo on the article completely. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Thekingishere26 (talk • contribs) 18:18, 21 February 2007 (UTC).[reply]

On that note, this morning Skip called out Wikipedia for having his birthdate wrong. I didn't catch the year, but I at least have the date changed. Did anyone hear what year he said? I think he said 1964, but it could easily have been 1954 because I had headphones in. Jklharris (talk) 16:56, 6 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

He said 1964 but they laughed at him, so he may have been joking about the year. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.55.214.85 (talk) 19:06, 6 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Dallas Cowboy fans editing page

There are regular revisions to this page by someone obiviously angry about Skip's views regarding the Dallas Cowboys. These edits are not based in fact and are, in fact, against Wikipedia's most basic policies. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.11.95.16 (talk) 05:07, 1 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

How does it feel?

Hey Skip I just wanted to know how you feel tonight? Do you feel like a fool for not showing any support to your school? I have always believed that on any given day or any given night the unthinkable could happen. You said that Vanderbilt had NO CHANCE agaisnt Tennessee. Man Dana has more love for Michigan and will never back down, don't ever let her hear anything negative about them and they could suck but she will always show support. I hope Jay Feely gets you tomorrow morning because you deserve it. Never doubt the heart of a group of young people in doing something people think they don't have a shot at doing. I am sure Vanderbilt will appreciate your future support. L 76.174.225.224 (talk) 08:08, 27 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Another edit to remove opinion

In the criticism section, there were some opinions listed among facts. I am no fan of Bayless, but the continued editing of this page to complete villainize him goes against what Wikipedia is supposed to be about. Stick to the facts and keep your opinions on your blogs.

@@ Line 32: / Line 32: @@
 L
 [[Special:Contributions/76.174.225.224|76.174.225.224]] ([[User talk:76.174.225.224|talk]]) 08:08, 27 February 2008 (UTC)
+== Another edit to remove opinion ==
+In the criticism section, there were some opinions listed among facts.  I am no fan of Bayless, but the continued editing of this page to complete villainize him goes against what Wikipedia is supposed to be about.  Stick to the facts and keep your opinions on your blogs.