User talk:75.47.132.6: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 23:06, 2 March 2008

Your freeway edits

I've looked at your edit history (and those of your apparent other IPs). You haven't posted any talk page comments that I can see. Ignoring other people's questions about your edits and outright removing them makes it very hard for others to assume that you are editing in good faith. It seems to me from your edits that you are trying to emphasize what you consider to be the names of the freeways instead of the numbers (e.g. Foothill Freeway instead of I-210). Is that correct? Evil saltine (talk) 11:15, 2 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I am not trying to take sides here. However, if you do not stop what you are doing immediately and respond to my question, you will be blocked for disruptive editing. Evil saltine (talk) 21:43, 2 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I don't have time for this and besides i hate that user Rschen7754 anyway because of accusing me of being a socketpuppety which i'm not a socketpuppety of Artisol2345! AL2TB and NE2 is right, all users aren't as smart as they think they are now.--75.47.132.6 (talk) 22:18, 2 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

And one more advice AL2TB reported to the Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard about this misbehaving user Rschen7754--75.47.132.6 (talk) 22:24, 2 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Which is unfounded. Our conclusion is that you're probably not a sockpuppet - but your refusal to discuss your edits / reverts and to accept criticism is disruptive. --Rschen7754 (T C) 22:28, 2 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

[edit conflict] I was about to report you, too, you know. You also touched my userspace. I don't know if you're allowed to or not, but let's wait until the discussion at the noticeboard concludes. In the meantime, I'm going to keep a close eye on you from now on. ^_^ AL2TB ^_^ 22:29, 2 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to warn a user about it See WP:UTM--75.47.132.6 (talk) 22:32, 2 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the tip. I'll do it next time when appropriate. ^_^ AL2TB ^_^ 22:33, 2 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The tags need to stay on - if you remove them again, I will protect the page to force them to stay on. --Rschen7754 (T C) 22:37, 2 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

You know what happened the last time when you protected the IP's talk page. You don't want deja vu, do you? ^_^ AL2TB ^_^ 22:44, 2 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

And be advised that Rschen7754 should not be trusted at all because of possible administrator abuse--75.47.132.6 (talk) 22:36, 2 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I don't trust Rschen7754 either; he is a nuisance to me ever since, like, two months ago. I don't take advice from people who accuse me as a sockpuppet (Rschen7754 in particular). And if you want to do the same, be my guest. ^_^ AL2TB ^_^ 22:38, 2 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

If you read WP:Administrators you might find out--75.47.132.6 (talk) 22:40, 2 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I sure read that one. Besides there are times where I wish Wikipedia didn't have administrators; just Jimmy Wales and bot accounts to do the admin stuff. I think that'd be a much better society in Wikipedia. ^_^ AL2TB ^_^ 22:42, 2 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

As far i'm concerned Rschen7754 misused his powers against me for socketpuppety--75.47.132.6 (talk) 22:44, 2 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Me, too. Oh, and by the way, can you please do me a favor? If I remove the sockpuppet tags, can you please not readd them on again? That would be appreciated. ^_^ AL2TB ^_^ 22:45, 2 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

As they said:

Removal of adminship

Administrators can be removed if they misuse their powers. Currently, administrators may be removed either at the request of Jimbo Wales or by a ruling of the Arbitration Committee. At their discretion, lesser penalties may also be assessed against problematic administrators, including the restriction of their use of certain powers or placement on administrative probation. The technical ability to remove administrator status rests with stewards.

There have been alternative procedures suggested for the removal of sysop status, but none of them have achieved consensus. Some administrators will voluntarily stand for reconfirmation under certain circumstances; see Category:Wikipedia administrators open to recall.--75.47.132.6 (talk) 22:48, 2 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Do you know where we can make a request? I plan to do so should Rschen7754 get out of control with his admin powers. (Hope he never makes it to beraucratship.) ^_^ AL2TB ^_^ 22:53, 2 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

You can make a request to either Jimbo Wales at his user talk page or the Arbitration Committee That's all--75.47.132.6 (talk) 22:55, 2 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you

Thank you for removing those categories from my userpage. ^_^ AL2TB ^_^ 23:06, 2 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

@@ Line 31: / Line 31: @@
 :Do you know where we can make a request? I plan to do so should Rschen7754 get out of control with his admin powers. (Hope he never makes it to beraucratship.) '''[[User talk:AL2TB|^_^]] <big>[[User:AL2TB|AL2TB]]</big> [[Special:Contributions/AL2TB|^_^]]''' 22:53, 2 March 2008 (UTC)
 You can make a request to either [[User talk:Jimbo Wales|Jimbo Wales]] at his user talk page or the [[Wikipedia talk:Arbitration Committee|Arbitration Committee]] That's all--[[Special:Contributions/75.47.132.6|75.47.132.6]] ([[User talk:75.47.132.6#top|talk]]) 22:55, 2 March 2008 (UTC)
+== Thank you ==
+Thank you for removing those categories from my userpage. '''[[User talk:AL2TB|^_^]] <big>[[User:AL2TB|AL2TB]]</big> [[Special:Contributions/AL2TB|^_^]]''' 23:06, 2 March 2008 (UTC)