User talk:Xgmx: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{archive box |
{{archive box}} |
||
*[[/Archive. original|Original Talk Page]] |
|||
}} |
|||
Revision as of 00:24, 12 March 2008
|
|
Apocalyptica (video game)
A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Apocalyptica (video game), suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}}
notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you agree with the deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please add {{db-author}}
to the top of Apocalyptica (video game). Oo7565 (talk) 08:28, 5 March 2008 (UTC)
Hello, I'm terribly sorry that you find that article unorthodox, however please note that I own that game and if you have any questions on the reliability of that article I would be glad to supply the information so it doesn't get deleted. Also, please note that that article has been edited several times since I created it, and hardly (if any, except the link to the official website of the game) remains my original work.--Xgmx (talk) 00:08, 12 March 2008 (UTC)
banned
Hey man, rumor has it you got wrongly banned here. Is it true?--24.171.56.50 (talk) 15:48, 8 March 2008 (UTC)
Who are you? anyway it seems like your right, sry it took me so long to respond to your message--Xgmx (talk) 00:00, 12 March 2008 (UTC)
Block?
Xgmx (block log • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • user rights management • checkuser (log))
IP address: 4.245.73.33 (block log • active blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • WHOIS • RDNS • RBLs • unblock • checkuser (log))
Blocking admin: Daniel Case (talk • blocks)
Block message:
WARNING: If you were blocked directly then you are using the wrong template and your block will not be reviewed since you have not provided a reason for unblocking. Please use {{unblock | reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
instead.
If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, or when you need checkuser assistance, please place {{subst:Unblock on hold-notification | 1=Xgmx}}
on the administrator's talk page. Then replace this template with the following:
{{unblock-auto on hold | 1=Daniel Case | 2=<nowiki>hardening block</nowiki> | 3=4.245.73.33 | 4= | 5=~~~~}}
If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting decline reason here
with any specific rationale. If the decline=
parameter is omitted, a reason for unblocking will be requested.
{{unblock-auto reviewed | 1=4.245.73.33 | 2=<nowiki>hardening block</nowiki> | 3=Daniel Case | decline=decline reason here ~~~~}}
If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting accept reason here
with your rationale:
{{unblock-auto reviewed | 1=4.245.73.33 | 2=<nowiki>hardening block</nowiki> | 3=Daniel Case | accept=accept reason here ~~~~}}
Oh my god why can't I edit articles, it says block! please help me.--Xgmx (talk) 00:00, 12 March 2008 (UTC)
block 2
Xgmx (block log • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • user rights management • checkuser (log))
IP address: xgmx (block log • active blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • WHOIS • RDNS • RBLs • unblock • checkuser (log))
Blocking admin: Daniel Case (talk • blocks)
Block message:
WARNING: If you were blocked directly then you are using the wrong template and your block will not be reviewed since you have not provided a reason for unblocking. Please use {{unblock | reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
instead.
If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, or when you need checkuser assistance, please place {{subst:Unblock on hold-notification | 1=Xgmx}}
on the administrator's talk page. Then replace this template with the following:
{{unblock-auto on hold | 1=Daniel Case | 2=<nowiki>hardening block</nowiki> | 3=xgmx | 4= | 5=~~~~}}
If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting decline reason here
with any specific rationale. If the decline=
parameter is omitted, a reason for unblocking will be requested.
{{unblock-auto reviewed | 1=xgmx | 2=<nowiki>hardening block</nowiki> | 3=Daniel Case | decline=decline reason here ~~~~}}
If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting accept reason here
with your rationale:
{{unblock-auto reviewed | 1=xgmx | 2=<nowiki>hardening block</nowiki> | 3=Daniel Case | accept=accept reason here ~~~~}}
Here I recreated this with my username instead of my IP address, its probably easier for you tech support people out there.--Xgmx (talk) 00:03, 12 March 2008 (UTC)