Talk:V. S. Naipaul: Difference between revisions
m Signing comment by Randhirreddy - "" |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 24: | Line 24: | ||
Can somebody fix the infobox errors? Randhirreddy 15:07, 21 November 2007 (UTC) <small>—Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:Randhirreddy|Randhirreddy]] ([[User talk:Randhirreddy|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Randhirreddy|contribs]]) {{{2|}}}</small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> |
Can somebody fix the infobox errors? Randhirreddy 15:07, 21 November 2007 (UTC) <small>—Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:Randhirreddy|Randhirreddy]] ([[User talk:Randhirreddy|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Randhirreddy|contribs]]) {{{2|}}}</small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> |
||
Of all the talk pages of all the pages in WP; this one has done the least in terms of contributing to the betterment of the main article. And, I just joined the bandwagon with this comment. ~~Abhishek 21 March 2008 |
|||
Revision as of 15:12, 21 March 2008
| This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
 | Biography B‑class | ||||||
| |||||||
I notice VS Naipaul does not yet have a proper length biography, unlike Edward Said, which is odd considering Naipaul's long literary career. Evidence of liberal bias in Wikipedia? I hope not.
- Liberal bias? What does "liberal bias" have to do with Naipaul? I'm confused. Guettarda 19:51, 20 Jun 2005 (UTC)
This devotes way too much attention to his politics. He won the Nobel Prize for his artistry as a novelist. This whole entry needs rewriting. --Griot
Yes, I agreed there should be more about the novels, and I don't think the list of fiction is correct as "The Loss of El Dorado" is definitely non-fiction.
--Alan 23:01, 28 March 2006 (UTC)
Perhaps due to the prohibition about speaking against the prophet are there too few entries regarding the esteemed Mr. Naipaul. One billion people acceeding to a prohibition leaves few to make commentary. -- [Ethicalone503]
- There's a prohibition against speaking ill of V.S. Naipaul, and one billion people "acceed" to it? Who knew? Griot 23:48, 22 April 2006 (UTC)
- User:Ethicalone503 was referring to Naipaul's criticisms of Islam. 70.23.177.216 09:13, 5 December 2006 (UTC)
- Yes, I knew that. And I was making fun of using Ethicalone503, who doesn't know what "acceed" means. Griot 19:07, 5 December 2006 (UTC)
Oh.
70.23.177.216 16:37, 15 December 2006 (UTC)
Can somebody fix the infobox errors? Randhirreddy 15:07, 21 November 2007 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Randhirreddy (talk • contribs)
Of all the talk pages of all the pages in WP; this one has done the least in terms of contributing to the betterment of the main article. And, I just joined the bandwagon with this comment. ~~Abhishek 21 March 2008