Talk:Pyrroloquinoline quinone: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 08:54, 10 April 2008

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Chemicals, a daughter project of WikiProject Chemistry, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of chemicals. To participate, help improve this article or visit the project page for details on the project.ChemicalsWikipedia:WikiProject ChemicalsTemplate:WikiProject Chemicalschemicals articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Nunh-huh, did you not read their FAQ, or do you have new information?

"At the molecular level, PQQ is involved in the lysine degradation. We have found a gene for PQQ-dependent enzyme from human as well as from mouse. So, PQQ is also essential to humans."

Yggdræsil

I edited the page by removing the "not a vitamin" sentence as it has positively been identified as a vitamin from what I've read. 24.83.178.11 09:06, 9 January 2007 (UTC)KnowledgeSeeker[reply]

PQQ Not A Vitamin Maybe?

If PQQ is SUSPECTED to not be a vitamin, then the article should reflect it. i.e. the research saying it is a vitamin and the counter research should both be mentioned since nothing has been proven definitely.24.83.148.131 (talk) 08:48, 10 April 2008 (UTC)BeeCier[reply]

Revision as of 08:53, 10 April 2008 edit 24.83.148.131 (talk) →PQQ Not A Vitamin Maybe? ← Previous edit		Revision as of 08:54, 10 April 2008 edit undo 24.83.148.131 (talk) →PQQ Not A Vitamin Maybe? Next edit →
Line 13:		Line 13:

	==PQQ Not A Vitamin Maybe?==		==PQQ Not A Vitamin Maybe?==
	If PQQ is SUSPECTED to not be a vitamin, then the article should reflect it. i.e. the research saying it is a vitamin and the counter research should both be mentioned since nothing has been proven ~~defenitely~~.[[Special:Contributions/24.83.148.131\|24.83.148.131]] ([[User talk:24.83.148.131\|talk]]) 08:48, 10 April 2008 (UTC)BeeCier		If PQQ is SUSPECTED to not be a vitamin, then the article should reflect it. i.e. the research saying it is a vitamin and the counter research should both be mentioned since nothing has been proven definitely.[[Special:Contributions/24.83.148.131\|24.83.148.131]] ([[User talk:24.83.148.131\|talk]]) 08:48, 10 April 2008 (UTC)BeeCier