Jump to content

Talk:Deccan Chronicle: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
m Reverted edits by 59.96.163.134 (talk) to last version by SineBot
→‎Deccan Chargers: new section
Line 15: Line 15:


I agree it is more neutal now... And the paper is becoming spicier everyday and this is not good for it,... <small>—Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/203.200.112.5|203.200.112.5]] ([[User talk:203.200.112.5|talk]]) 17:56, 23 March 2008 (UTC)</small><!-- Template:UnsignedIP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
I agree it is more neutal now... And the paper is becoming spicier everyday and this is not good for it,... <small>—Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/203.200.112.5|203.200.112.5]] ([[User talk:203.200.112.5|talk]]) 17:56, 23 March 2008 (UTC)</small><!-- Template:UnsignedIP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->

== [[Deccan Chargers]] ==

I'm surprised there was no mention in the article about the Deccan Chargers IPL franchise that The Deccan Chronicle owns! Especially because the IPL is already underway... didn't think WP(=us) could be this slow. I added a bit about it. Cheers! [[Special:Contributions/64.215.87.3|64.215.87.3]] ([[User talk:64.215.87.3|talk]]) 14:58, 22 April 2008 (UTC)

Revision as of 14:58, 22 April 2008

WikiProject iconIndia Unassessed
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.
???This article has not yet received a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
???This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.


neutrality disputed

The previous "version" (before I edited it) of this article seemed to have been written a person who benefits monetarily from this newspaper because the article did not respect the neutrality law of the website. I would suggest that this article be kept under scrutiny.

Nostalgia

in 80's DC used to carry a full 2 pages of movie listsings in the 100 odd theatres in the city. gone are the theatres and DC also has changed. --Hydman 13:13, 25 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Content

DC used to be anti TDP and pro congress. It seems to be more neutral now. also would like to elaborate on the spicy nature of the paper. Any one concurring with me??--Hydman 13:13, 25 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I agree it is more neutal now... And the paper is becoming spicier everyday and this is not good for it,... —Preceding unsigned comment added by 203.200.112.5 (talk) 17:56, 23 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I'm surprised there was no mention in the article about the Deccan Chargers IPL franchise that The Deccan Chronicle owns! Especially because the IPL is already underway... didn't think WP(=us) could be this slow. I added a bit about it. Cheers! 64.215.87.3 (talk) 14:58, 22 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]