Jump to content

Talk:No Pussyfooting: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
m moved Talk:Fripp & Eno (No Pussyfooting) to Talk:No Pussyfooting (album): All of the authorities (allmusic.com, amazon.com, every webpage commenting on the album) treat the album as "No Pussyfooting, rather than "Fripp and Eno (No Pussyfooting)"
Wounder (talk | contribs)
(No difference)

Revision as of 09:16, 26 April 2008

WikiProject iconAlbums Redirect‑class
WikiProject iconThis redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Albums, an attempt at building a useful resource on recordings from a variety of genres. If you would like to participate, visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.
RedirectThis redirect does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.

(No Pussyfooting)

I'm not shure if this clarifies anything, but the discography at enoweb lists the album as (No Pussyfooting). As with the other albums here, the artist names are separeted from the album title with a colon but the title is still in parenthesizes. Also the artists are credited as Robert Fripp / Brian Eno rather than Fripp & Eno as appears on the album cover. Justin Foote 02:29, 6 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Fripp & Eno's No Pussyfooting.jpg

Image:Fripp & Eno's No Pussyfooting.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 08:34, 4 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

(No Pussyfooting)

I don't want to get into a edit war over this but the title of this recording is (No Pussyfooting) . Fripp & Eno are the artists. Calling it Fripp & Eno (No Pussyfooting) is like calling the second Beatles album The Beatles With The Beatles.

BTLizard 18:26, 20 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

There is no need to get into an edit war, because I am correct and you are wrong :-D In all seriousness: the title is "Fripp & Eno (no pussyfooting)". This is a little play on words, meaning "Fripp and Eno (no mucking about wasting time)", referring to their spontaneous working methods. It is probably best said in a Cockney accent ;-) If you take off the "Fripp & Eno" bit, then there is no reason for the brackets to be there - you've broken the pun. To use your example, it would be like saying the Beatles record's title was "With", by The Beatles. Clearing this would be ludicrous: the title of that album is "With the Beatles" - it is a little phrase in itself, which doesn't work unless "The Beatles" is in it - remove it and you just get "With". You see? --feline1 18:53, 20 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

PS No pussyfooting isn't an "Eno" album *anyways*, so it doesn't belong in the Infobox chronology - it's a Fripp & Eno album.--feline1 18:54, 20 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]