Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ancient Khmer sculpture: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
Anturiaethwr (talk | contribs) I'm just never going to be satisfied with what I write, am I? |
|||
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
*'''Comment''' Huh? [[User:TenPoundHammer|<span style="color:green">Ten Pound Hammer</span>]] <small>and his otters</small> • <sup>([[Special:Contributions/TenPoundHammer|Broken clamshells]]•[[:User talk:TenPoundHammer|Otter chirps]])</sup> 20:51, 12 May 2008 (UTC) |
*'''Comment''' Huh? [[User:TenPoundHammer|<span style="color:green">Ten Pound Hammer</span>]] <small>and his otters</small> • <sup>([[Special:Contributions/TenPoundHammer|Broken clamshells]]•[[:User talk:TenPoundHammer|Otter chirps]])</sup> 20:51, 12 May 2008 (UTC) |
||
*'''Delete''' both this and [[Khmer sculpture]]--though without prejudice against recreation for the latter, as there seems to be quite a bit of useful information on this topic and that would be the proper title. They're both fascinating, well-written (except that "Ancient" has no paragraph breaks), and [[WP:OR|OR]] [[WP:NOT#OR|essays]]. I would, however, like to reiterate the comment of the hardware and his marine mammals; I can't figure out what's going on here. The nominator (who is also the author and main contributor for both of these articles; isn't that [[WP:CSD#G7|a criterion for speedy deletion?]]) created both of these articles today, and has already [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Ancient_Khmer_sculpture&diff=next&oldid=211895569 declined a ProD]. Some explanation is in order. <font face="Palatino Linotype">'''[[User:Anturiaethwr|<span style="color:green">Anturiaethwr</span>]]'''</font><small><font color="black">[[User_Talk:Anturiaethwr|Talk]]</font></small> 20:59, 12 May 2008 (UTC) |
*'''Delete''' both this and [[Khmer sculpture]]--though without prejudice against recreation for the latter, as there seems to be quite a bit of useful information on this topic and that would be the proper title. They're both fascinating, well-written (except that "Ancient" has no paragraph breaks), and [[WP:OR|OR]] [[WP:NOT#OR|essays]]. I would, however, like to reiterate the comment of the hardware and his marine mammals; I can't figure out what's going on here. The nominator (who is also the author and main contributor for both of these articles; isn't that [[WP:CSD#G7|a criterion for speedy deletion?]]) created both of these articles today, and has already [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Ancient_Khmer_sculpture&diff=next&oldid=211895569 declined a ProD]. Some explanation is in order. <font face="Palatino Linotype">'''[[User:Anturiaethwr|<span style="color:green">Anturiaethwr</span>]]'''</font><small><font color="black">[[User_Talk:Anturiaethwr|Talk]]</font></small> 20:59, 12 May 2008 (UTC) |
||
*'''Keep''' [[Ancient Khmer sculpture]] and [[Khmer sculpture]] should be merged. [[Khmer sculpture]] is sourced (though it's lacking inline citations) and notable. It needs rewriting, but I think it's a better idea to improve on what's there. — [[User:Ksero|Ksero]] ([[User talk:Ksero|talk]] | [[Special:Contributions/Ksero|contribs]]) 21:11, 12 May 2008 (UTC) |
|||
Revision as of 21:11, 12 May 2008
- Ancient Khmer sculpture (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
doubled, there is a same article already so please delete today Liguria (talk) 20:22, 12 May 2008 (UTC)
- Comment Huh? Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • (Broken clamshells•Otter chirps) 20:51, 12 May 2008 (UTC)
- Delete both this and Khmer sculpture--though without prejudice against recreation for the latter, as there seems to be quite a bit of useful information on this topic and that would be the proper title. They're both fascinating, well-written (except that "Ancient" has no paragraph breaks), and OR essays. I would, however, like to reiterate the comment of the hardware and his marine mammals; I can't figure out what's going on here. The nominator (who is also the author and main contributor for both of these articles; isn't that a criterion for speedy deletion?) created both of these articles today, and has already declined a ProD. Some explanation is in order. AnturiaethwrTalk 20:59, 12 May 2008 (UTC)
- Keep Ancient Khmer sculpture and Khmer sculpture should be merged. Khmer sculpture is sourced (though it's lacking inline citations) and notable. It needs rewriting, but I think it's a better idea to improve on what's there. — Ksero (talk | contribs) 21:11, 12 May 2008 (UTC)