Talk:Encyclopedia Dramatica: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
add talk header and wikiprojects |
|||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{talkheader}} |
|||
{{WPB |
|||
|1={{WikiProject Websites}} |
|||
|2={{WP Internet culture|class=B|importance=mid}} |
|||
|3={{Comedy|class=B|importance=mid}} |
|||
|4={{WikiProject Wikipedia|class=B|importance=mid}} |
|||
}} |
|||
{{Calm talk}} |
{{Calm talk}} |
||
: ''See latest DRV [[Wikipedia:Deletion review/Log/2008 May 8]]. Note the closer explicitly does '''not''' preclude relisting at AFD if needed.'' |
: ''See latest DRV [[Wikipedia:Deletion review/Log/2008 May 8]]. Note the closer explicitly does '''not''' preclude relisting at AFD if needed.'' |
||
Revision as of 10:36, 14 May 2008
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Encyclopedia Dramatica article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
| Archives: Index, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25 |
 | This article is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||
.svg){kind=icon}
 | Please stay calm and civil while commenting or presenting evidence, and do not make personal attacks. Be patient when approaching solutions to any issues. If consensus is not reached, other solutions exist to draw attention and ensure that more editors mediate or comment on the dispute. |
- See latest DRV Wikipedia:Deletion review/Log/2008 May 8. Note the closer explicitly does not preclude relisting at AFD if needed.
Wow
Thats a HUGE amount of references for a mid-importance site Retro Agnostic (talk) 08:31, 14 May 2008 (UTC)
- That's because the page has had a huge amount of issues. Stifle (talk) 09:20, 14 May 2008 (UTC)
Don't AFD
I would strongly recommend not AFDing this page for at least a month as it would prove unduly divisive and disruptive, especially after such a strong consensus to recreate it. Stifle (talk) 09:20, 14 May 2008 (UTC)
We need more articles to link to this
I'm sure we could start, somehow, by including links in the articles 4chan, Anonymous (group) and/or Project Chanology to here. But how should we do it without original research?--AnonymousUser12345 (talk) 09:20, 14 May 2008 (UTC)
- We don't need more to link here. If relevant articles exist they will be linked as outside connections are documented. MBisanz talk 09:22, 14 May 2008 (UTC)