Jump to content

Talk:Back Breaker: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Sector311 (talk | contribs)
Line 28: Line 28:


Okay. I was the reason this discussion got started and I'm gonna be the reason it finishes. If you want to hear what the album will sound like, you can click on the link in the article leading to The Showdown's youtube channel. You can watch the videos that are there and hear for yourself if you really want to know. Otherwise, wait until the album is add a bunch of predictions. I'm speaking to myself too, since I was the one that created the article. [[User:Sector311|-Sector311]] ([[User talk:Sector311|talk]]) 12:50, 25 May 2008 (UTC)
Okay. I was the reason this discussion got started and I'm gonna be the reason it finishes. If you want to hear what the album will sound like, you can click on the link in the article leading to The Showdown's youtube channel. You can watch the videos that are there and hear for yourself if you really want to know. Otherwise, wait until the album is add a bunch of predictions. I'm speaking to myself too, since I was the one that created the article. [[User:Sector311|-Sector311]] ([[User talk:Sector311|talk]]) 12:50, 25 May 2008 (UTC)

Well ok then.I'm a little bit confused but whatever.

Revision as of 18:21, 25 May 2008

WikiProject iconAlbums Unassessed
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Albums, an attempt at building a useful resource on recordings from a variety of genres. If you would like to participate, visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.
???This article has not yet received a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.

Usefullness of extra headline

To show that Back Breaker could have a different sound than Temptation Come my Way. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Sector311 (talkcontribs) 16:57, 10 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Sadly, such analysis seems to be original research and speculation, which are not things that Wikipedia can use- instead, everything should be verified by reliable sources. J Milburn (talk) 17:18, 10 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry for wasting you time. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Sector311 (talkcontribs) 17:32, 10 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

No problem, we were all new once! J Milburn (talk) 18:31, 10 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not new and I think we should add it. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.29.146.158 (talk) 21:14, 10 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Whether you're new or not, you seem to be unfamiliar with our policies. As explained above, Wikipedia cannot accept original research. Any analysis or speculation must have been previously published, and our mention must be attributed to the original. J Milburn (talk) 21:23, 10 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

When will you people realize that your policies don't mean crap to anyone! Nobody wants a bad artical just because your "Policies" keep it from being good. And it matters a ton that people will know their might be a harder sound. People cared a lot when they heard temptation come my way was going to be softer. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 207.119.76.43 (talk) 22:38, 21 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Short answer- if you do not care about our policies, then perhaps you shouldn't be editing. Long answer- our policies are all there for a reason, and showing a little respect to our verifiability and no original research policies would improve Wikipedia massively though making us that little bit more reliable- our main criticism being that we are unreliable. You seem to have no idea what Wikipedia or even an encyclopedia is, and a rant about what someone thinks an album will be like does not make a good encyclopedia article. J Milburn (talk) 23:25, 21 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

But the people need to know wether or not it will be diferent than the last. Just think about this. If The Showdown where to decide on wether or not it would stay they would say yes. Because more people would buy it if they heard this. Basicly, You can mess with any other artical on wikipedia. Just let this ONE slide please. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 207.119.76.43 (talk) 21:48, 22 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

No. We're not here to advertise the album, and we're not here to guess what it is going to be like. J Milburn (talk) 21:51, 22 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Amen. I agree with you this time.-Sector311 (talk) 22:48, 22 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Ok I even agree that was off but, I still think it would help. And ether way the album comes out at most in august and then everything will be clear. So can't we just leave it until then? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.29.148.39 (talk) 20:33, 23 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Once it comes out, there will be reviews, and you are more than welcome to add the opinions of professional reviewers, as long as you cite your sources. J Milburn (talk) 20:57, 23 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Well I would add it myself but I don't know how. But I do know how to Cite my recorces if this is what you mean.[citation needed]

Well is it? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.29.148.39 (talk) 02:00, 25 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Okay. I was the reason this discussion got started and I'm gonna be the reason it finishes. If you want to hear what the album will sound like, you can click on the link in the article leading to The Showdown's youtube channel. You can watch the videos that are there and hear for yourself if you really want to know. Otherwise, wait until the album is add a bunch of predictions. I'm speaking to myself too, since I was the one that created the article. -Sector311 (talk) 12:50, 25 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Well ok then.I'm a little bit confused but whatever.